Effective treatment of olive mill effluents from two-phase and three-phase extraction processes by batch membranes in series operation upon threshold conditions

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 263, Issue , 2013, Pages 168-176

  Ochando Pulido, J M ^a   Hodaifa, G ^b   Victor Ortega, M D ^a   Rodriguez Vives, S ^a   Martinez Ferez, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Nanofiltration; Olive mill wastewater; Reverse osmosis; Threshold flux; Ultrafiltration; Wastewater reclamation

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AND OPERATIONS; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; MATHEMATICAL APPROACH; OLIVE MILL EFFLUENTS; OLIVE MILL WASTEWATERS; ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT; PRETREATMENT PROCESS; WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT;

EFFLUENTS; EXTRACTION; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; NANOFILTRATION; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION;

WATER FILTRATION;

INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT; OLIVE OIL; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

BIOFOULING; DISCHARGE; EFFLUENT; EVERGREEN TREE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FILTRATION; FLOCCULATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEMBRANE; MILL; ORGANIC MATTER; OSMOSIS; OXIDE; POLLUTION EFFECT; THRESHOLD; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; BATCH PROCESS; EXTRACTION; NANOFILTRATION; OLIVE; PHOTOCATALYSIS; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

ITALY; SPAIN;

NANOFILTRATION; OLIVE MILL WASTEWATER; REVERSE OSMOSIS; THRESHOLD FLUX; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION;

FILTRATION; FLOCCULATION; FOOD INDUSTRY; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PHOTOLYSIS; PLANT OILS; TEMPERATURE; TITANIUM; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID;

EID: 84888203382     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.041     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Baccar R., Bouzid J., Feki M., Montiel A. Preparation of activated carbon from Tunisian olive-waste cakes and its application for adsorption of heavy metal ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162(2-3):1522-1529.
2. Malkoc E., Nuhoglu Y., Dundar M. Adsorption of chromium (VI) on pomace - An olive oil industry waste: batch and column studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 138(1):142-151.
3. Bouzid J., Elouear Z., Ksibi M., Feki M., Montiel A. A study on removal characteristics of copper from aqueous solution by sewage sludge and pomace ashes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152(2):838-845.
4. Akar T., Tosun I., Kaynak Z., Ozkara E., Yeni O., Sahin E.N., Akar S.T. An attractive agro-industrial by-product in environmental cleanup: dye biosorption potential of untreated olive pomace. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166(2-3):1217-1225.
5. Stasinakis A.S., Elia I., Petalas A.V., Halvadakis C.P. Removal of total phenols from olive-mill wastewater using an agricultural by-product, olive pomace. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 160(2-3):408-413.
6. Haddadin M.S.Y., Haddadin J., Arabiyat O.I., Hattar B. Biological conversion of olive pomace into compost by using Trichoderma harzianum and Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Biores. Tech. 2009, 100(20):4773-4782.
7. Tekin A.R., Coşkun Dalgiç A. Biogas production from olive pomace. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2000, 30(4):301-313.
8. Niaounakis M., Halvadakis C.P. Olive Processing Waste Management Literature Review and Patent Survey. Waste Management Series 5 2006, 23-64. Elsevier. 2nd ed.
9. Paraskeva P., Diamadopoulos E. Technologies for olive mill wastewater (OMW) treatment: a review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81:475-1485.
10. Hodaifa G., Eugenia-Sánchez M., Sánchez S. Use of industrial wastewater from olive-oil extraction for biomass production of Scenedesmus obliquus. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:1111-1117.
11. Mendoza A., Hidalgo-Casado F., Ruiz-Gómez M.A., Martínez-Román F., Moyano-Pérez M.J., Cert-Ventulá A., Pérez-Camino M.C., Ruiz-Méndez M.V. Characteristics of olive oils from first and second centrifugation. Oil Grease 1996, 47:163-181.
12. Rozzi A., Limoni N., Menegatti S., Boari G., Liberti L., Passino R. Influence of Na and Ca alkalinity on UASB treatment of olive mill effluents. Part 1. Preliminary results. Process Chem. 1988, 23:86-90.
13. Garrido Hoyos S.E., Martínez Nieto L., Camacho Rubio F., Ramos Cormenzana A. Kinetics of aerobic treatment of olive mill wastewater (OMW) with Aspergillus terreus. Process Biochem. 2002, 37(10):1169-1176.
14. Marques I.P. Anaerobic digestion treatment of olive mill wastewater for effluent re-use in irrigation. Desalination 2001, 137:233-239.
15. Fountoulakis M.S., Dokianakis S.N., Kornaros M.E., Aggelis G.G., Lyberatos G. Removal of phenolics in olive mill wastewaters using the white-rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus. Water Res. 2002, 36:4735-4744.
16. Ammary B.Y. Treatment of olive mill wastewater using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Desalination 2005, 177:157-165.
17. Taccari M., Ciani M. Use of Pichia fermentans and Candida sp. strains for the biological treatment of stored olive mill wastewater. Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 33:2385-2390.
18. Annesini M., Gironi F. Olive oil mill effluent: ageing effects on evaporation behavior. Water Res. 1991, 25:1157-1960.
19. Aktas E.S., Imre S., Esroy L. Characterization and lime treatment of olive mill wastewater. Water Res. 2001, 35:2336-2340.
20. Al-Malah K., Azzam M.O.J., Abu-Lail N.I. Olive mills effluent (OME) wastewater post-treatment using activated clay. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2000, 20:225-234.
21. Cegarra J., Paredes C., Roig A., Bernal M.P., García D. Use of olive mill wastewater compost for crop production. Int. Biodet. Biodegrad. 1996, 38(3-4):193-203.
22. Papadimitriou E.K., Chatjipavlidis I., Balis C. Application of composting to olive mill wastewater treatment. Environ. Technol. 1997, 18(1):10-107.
23. Bouranis D.L., Vlyssides A.G., Drossopoulos J.B., Karvouni G. Some characteristics of a new organic soil conditioner from the co-composting of olive oil processing wastewater and solid residue. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1995, 26:2461-2472.
24. Sarika R., Kalogerakis N., Mantzavinos D. Treatment of olive mill effluents. Part II. Complete removal of solids by direct flocculation with poly-electrolytes. Environ. Int. 2005, 31:297-304.
25. Martínez Nieto L., Hodaifa G., Rodríguez Vives J.A., Giménez Casares J., Ochando Flocculation-sedimentation combined with chemical oxidation process. Clean Soil, Air, Water 2011, 39(10):949-955.
26. Stoller M. On the effect of flocculation as pretreatment process and particle size distribution for membrane fouling reduction. Desalination 2009, 240:209-217.
27. Inan H., Dimoglo A., Şimşek H., Karpuzcu M. Olive oil mill wastewater treatment by means of electro-coagulation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 36(1):23-31.
28. Tezcan Ün Ü., Uǧur S., Koparal A.S., Öǧütveren Ü.B. Electrocoagulation of olive mill wastewaters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 52(1):136-141.
29. De Heredia J.B., Garcia J. Process integration: continuous anaerobic digestion - ozonation treatment of olive mill wastewater. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44:8750-8755.
30. Martínez Nieto L., Hodaifa G., Rodríguez Vives, Giménez Casares J.A., Ochando J. Degradation of organic matter in olive oil mill wastewater through homogeneous Fenton-like reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173(2):503-510.
31. Hodaifa G., Ochando-Pulido J.M., Rodriguez-Vives S., Martinez-Ferez A. Optimization of continuous reactor at pilot scale for olive-oil mill wastewater treatment by Fenton-like process. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220:117-124.
32. Stoller M., Bravi M. Critical flux analyses on differently pretreated olive vegetation wastewater streams: some case studies. Desalination 2010, 250:578-582.
33. 2 anode. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2010, 40(4):729-737.
34. Tezcan Ün Ü., Altay U., Koparal A.S., Ogutveren U.B. Complete treatment of olive mill wastewaters by electrooxidation. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 139:445-452.
35. Canizares P., Martinez L., Paz R., Saéz C., Lobato J., Rodrigo M.A. Treatment of Fenton-refractory olive oil mill wastes by electrochemical oxidation with boron-doped diamond anodes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81(8):1331-1337.
36. Grafias P., Xekoukoulotakis N.P., Mantzavinos D., Diamadopoulos E. Pilot treatment of olive pomace leachate by vertical-flow constructed wetland and electrochemical oxidation: an efficient hybrid process. Water Res. 2010, 44(9):2773-2780.
37. Lafi W.K., Shannak B., Al-Shannag M., Al-Anber Z., Al-Hasan M. Treatment of olive mill wastewater by combined advanced oxidation and biodegradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 70(2):141-146.
38. Khoufi S., Aloui F., Sayadi S. Treatment of olive oil mill wastewater by combined process electro-Fenton reaction and anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 2006, 40:2007-2016.
39. Rizzo L., Lofrano G., Grassi M., Belgiorno V. Pretreatment of olive mill wastewater by chitosan coagulation and advanced oxidation processes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63(3):648-653.
40. Bódalo A., Gómez J.L., Gómez E., Máximo F., Hidalgo A.M. Application of reverse osmosis to reduce pollutants present in industrial wastewater. Desalination 2003, 155:101-108.
41. López J., Coello M.D., Quiroga J.M. Comparative studies of reverse osmosis membranes for wastewater reclamation. Desalination 2006, 191:137-147.
42. Pizzichini M., Russo C., Di Meo C. Purification of pulp and paper wastewater with membrane technology for water reuse in a closed loop. Desalination 2005, 178:351-359.
43. Iaquinta M., Stoller M., Merli C. Optimization of a nanofiltration membrane for tomato industry wastewater treatment. Desalination 2009, 245:314-320.
44. Lee J., Kwon T., Moon I. Performance of polyamide reverse osmosis membranes for steel waste water reuse. Desalination 2006, 189:309-322.
45. Samodurov A.N., Lysenko S.E., Gromov S.L., Panteleev A.A., Fedoseeva E.B. The use of reverse osmosis technology for water treatment in power engineering. Therm. Eng. 2006, 53(6):439-443.
46. Epimakhov V.N., Oleinik M.S., Moskvin L.N. Reverse osmosis filtration based water treatment and special water purification for nuclear power systems. At. Energy 2004, 96(4):234-240.
47. Canepa P., Marignetti N., Rognoni U., Calgari S. Olive mills wastewater treatment by combined membrane processes. Water Res. 1988, 22(12):1491-1494.
48. Borsani R., Ferrando B. Ultrafiltration plant for olive vegetation waters by polymeric membrane batteries. Desalination 1996, 108:281-286.
49. Turano E., Curcio S., De Paola M.G., Calabrò V., Iorio G. An integrated centrifugation-ultrafiltration system in the treatment of olive mill wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 206:519-531.
50. Stoller M. Technical optimization of a dual ultrafiltration and nanofiltration pilot plant in batch operation by means of the critical flux theory: a case study. Chem. Eng. Process. 2008, 47(7):1165-1170.
51. Akdemir E.O., Ozer A. Investigation of two ultrafiltration membranes for treatment of olive oil mill wastewater. Desalination 2009, 249:660-666.
52. Coskun T., Debik E., Demir N.M. Treatment of olive mill wastewaters by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2010, 259:65-70.
53. Ochando-Pulido J.M., Rodriguez-Vives S., Martinez-Ferez A. The effect of permeate recirculation on the depuration of pretreated olive mill wastewater through reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2012, 286:145-154.
54. Ochando-Pulido J.M., Hodaifa G., Rodriguez-Vives S., Martinez-Ferez A. Impacts of operating conditions on reverse osmosis performance of pretreated olive mill wastewater. Water Res. 2012, 46(15):4621-4632.
55. Ochando-Pulido J.M., Hodaifa G., Martinez-Ferez A. Fouling inhibition upon Fenton-like oxidation pretreatment for olive mill wastewater reclamation by membrane process. Chem. Eng. Process. 2012, 62:89-98.
56. Paraskeva C.A., Papadakis V.G., Tsarouchi E., Kanellopoulou D.G., Koutsoukos P.G. Membrane processing for olive mill wastewater fractionation. Desalination 2007, 213:218-229.
57. Russo C. A new membrane process for the selective fractionation and total recovery of polyphenols, water and organic substances from vegetation waters (VW). J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 288:239-246.
58. Garcia-Castello E., Cassano A., Criscuoli A., Conidi C., Drioli E. Recovery and concentration of polyphenols from olive mill wastewaters by integrated membrane system. Water Res. 2010, 44:3883-3892.
59. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 100:259-272.
60. Stoller M., Chianese A. Optimization of membrane batch processes by means of the critical flux theory. Desalination 2006, 191:62-70.
61. Stoller M. Effective fouling inhibition by critical flux based optimization methods on a NF membrane module for olive mill wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 168:1140-1148.
62. Mänttäri M., Nystörm M. Critical flux in NF of high molar mass polysaccharides and effluents from the paper industry. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 170:257-273.
63. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284(1-2):17-53.
64. Luo J., Ding L., Wan Y., Jaffrin M.Y. Threshold flux for shear-enhanced nanofiltration: experimental observation in dairy wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 409:276-284.
65. Field R.W., Pearce G.K. Critical, sustainable and threshold fluxes for membrane filtration with water industry applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 164:38-44.
66. Stoller M., Ochando-Pulido J.M. Going from a critical flux concept to a threshold flux concept on membrane processes treating olive mill wastewater streams. Procedia Eng. 2012, 44:607-608.
67. Greenberg A.E., Clesceri L.S., Eaton A.D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, APHA/AWWA/WEF 1992, CABS, Washington DC. 16th ed.
68. Ochando-Pulido J.M., Stoller M., Bravi M., Martinez-Ferez A., Chianese A. Batch membrane treatment of olive vegetation wastewater from two-phase olive oil production process by threshold flux based methods. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 101:34-41.
69. Chatterjee D., Dasgupta S. Visible light induced photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 2005, 6:186-205.
70. Cañizares P., Paz R., Sáez C., Rodrigo M.A. Costs of the electrochemical oxidation of wastewaters: a comparison with ozonation and Fenton oxidation processes. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:410-420.
71. 2 with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46:2741-2746.
72. De Caprariis B., Di Rita M., Stoller M., Verdone N., Chianese A. Reaction-precipitation by a spinning disc reactor: influence of hydrodynamics on nanoparticles production. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 76:73-80. 10.1016/j.ces.2012.03.043.
73. Sacco O., Stoller M., Vaiano V., Ciambelli P., Chianese A., Sannino D. Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes under visible light on n-doped photocatalysts. Int. J. Photoenergy 2012, Article ID 626759. 10.1155/2012/626759.
74. M. Stoller, M., Bravi, A. Chianese, Threshold flux measurements of a nanofiltration membrane module by critical flux data conversion, Desalination, doi:10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.013.
75. Espinasse B., Bacchin P., Aimar P. On an experimental method to measure critical flux in ultrafiltration. Desalination 2002, 146:91-96.
76. Hong S., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 132:159-181.
77. Jin X., Jawor A., Kim S., Hoek E.M.V. Effects of feed water temperature on separation performance and organic fouling of brackish water RO membranes. Desalination 2009, 239:346-359.
78. Chatzisymeon E., Xekoukoulotakis N.P., Mantzavinos D. Determination of key operating conditions for the photocatalytic treatment of olive mill wastewaters. Catal. Today 2009, 144:143-148.