Threshold flux for shear-enhanced nanofiltration: Experimental observation in dairy wastewater treatment

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 409-410, Issue , 2012, Pages 276-284

  Luo, Jianquan ^a   Ding, Luhui ^a   Wan, Yinhua ^b   Jaffrin, Michel Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

^b INSTITUTE OF PROCESS ENGINEERING   (China)

Author keywords

Critical flux; Flux decline; Fouling; Sustainable flux; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL FLUX; CRITICAL FOULING CONDITIONS; DAIRY WASTEWATER TREATMENT; EXPERIMENTAL OBSERVATION; FLUX DECLINE; FOULING RATE; HIGH SHEAR RATE; LONG-TERM OPERATION; OPTIMUM FLUX; PARTICLE DEPOSITIONS; PERMEABILITY LOSS; PERMEATE FLUX; SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

ADSORPTION; FOULING; MEMBRANE FOULING; NANOFILTRATION; RECLAMATION; SHEAR DEFORMATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

DAIRIES;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; BIOFOULING; DAIRY INDUSTRY; MEMBRANE FILTER; MILK; NANOFILTRATION; PERMEABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR RATE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84860597085     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.065     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Van der Bruggen B., Manttari M., Nystrom M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:251-263.
2. Jaffrin M.Y. Dynamic shear-enhanced membrane filtration: a review of rotating disks, rotating membranes and vibrating systems. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:7-25.
3. Bacchin P., Aimar P., Field R.W. Critical and sustainable fluxes: theory, experiments and applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:42-69.
4. Field R.W., Pearce G.K. Critical, sustainable and threshold fluxes for membrane filtration with water industry applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 164:38-44.
5. Tang C.Y., Leckie J.O. Membrane independent limiting flux for RO and NF membranes fouled by humic acid. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:4767-4773.
6. Aimar P., Field R. Limiting flux in membrane separations-a model based on the viscosity dependency of the mass-transfer coefficient. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1992, 47:579-586.
7. Song L.F. A new model for the calculation of the limiting flux in ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 144:173-185.
8. Bacchin P., Aimar P., Sanchez V. Model for colloidal fouling of membranes. AIChE J. 1995, 41:368-376.
9. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 100:259-272.
10. Howell J.A. Subcritical flux operation of microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107:165-171.
11. Luo J., Wei S., Su Y., Chen X., Wan Y. Desalination and recovery of iminodiacetic acid (IDA) from its sodium chloride mixtures by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342:35-41.
12. Luo J., Ding L.H., Wan Y., Paullier P., Jaffrin M.Y. Application of NF-RDM (nanofiltration rotating disk membrane) module under extreme hydraulic conditions for the treatment of dairy wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 163:307-316.
13. Manttari M., Nystrom M. Critical flux in NF of high molar mass polysaccharides and effluents from the paper industry. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 170:257-273.
14. Rabiller-Baudry M., Bouzid H., Chaufer B., Paugam L., Delaunay D., Mekmene O., Ahmad S., Gaucheron F. On the origin of flux dependence in pH-modified skim milk filtration. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2009, 89:363-385.
15. Tang C.Y., Chong T.H., Fane A.G. Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: a review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 164:126-143.
16. Seidel A., Elimelech M. Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implications for fouling control. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 203:245-255.
17. Chong T.H., Wong F.S., Fane A.G. The effect of imposed flux on biofouling in reverse osmosis: role of concentration polarisation and biofilm enhanced osmotic pressure phenomena. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:840-850.
18. Vrouwenveder J.S., van Paassen J.A.M., van Agtmaal J.M.C., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Kruithof J.C. A critical flux to avoid biofouling of spiral wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: fact or fiction?. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 326:36-44.
19. Soffer Y., Adin A., Gilron J. Threshold flux in fouling of UF membranes by colloidal iron. Desalination 2004, 161:207-221.
20. Rayess Y.E., Albasi C., Bacchin P., Taillandier P., Mietton-Peuchot M., Devatine A. Cross-flow microfiltration of wine: effect of colloids on critical fouling conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 385-386:177-186.
21. Palecek S.P., Zydney A.L. Intermolecular electrostatic interactions and their effect on flux and protein deposition during protein filtration. Biotechnol. Prog. 1994, 10:207-213.
22. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y.N., Leckie J.O. The role of foulant-foulant electrostatic interaction on limiting flux for RO and NF membranes during humic acid fouling-theoretical basis, experimental evidence, and AFM interaction force measurement. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 326:526-532.
23. Manttari M., Pekuri T., Nystrom M. NF270, a new membrane having promising characteristics and being suitable for treatment of dilute effluents from the paper industry. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 242:107-116.
24. Luo J., Ding L.H. Influence of pH on treatment of dairy wastewater by nanofiltration using shear-enhanced filtration system. Desalination 2011, 278:150-156.
25. Bouzerar R., Jaffrin M.Y., Ding L.H., Paullier P. Influence of geometry and angular velocity on performance of a rotating disk filter. AIChE J. 2000, 46:257-265.
26. Brans G., Schroen C.G.P.H., van der Sman R.G.M., Boom R.M. Membrane fractionation of milk: state of the art and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243:263-272.
27. Luo J., Ding L.H., Wan Y., Paullier P., Jaffrin M.Y. Fouling behavior of dairy wastewater treatment by nanofiltration under shear-enhanced extreme hydraulic conditions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 88:79-86.
28. Luo J., Ding L.H., Su Y., Wei S., Wan Y. Concentration polarization in concentrated saline solution during desalination of iron dextran by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 363:170-179.