Fouling inhibition upon fenton-like oxidation pretreatment for olive mill wastewater reclamation by membrane process

Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification

Volumn 62, Issue , 2012, Pages 89-98

  Ochando Pulido, J M ^a   Hodaifa, G ^b   Martinez Ferez, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Membrane pretreatments; Nanofiltration; Olive mill wastewater; Reverse osmosis; Wastewater reclamation; Wastewater reuse

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED OXIDATION; FENTON LIKES; FINAL EFFLUENTS; FOULING INHIBITION; FOULING PHENOMENA; MANUFACTURE PROCESS; MEMBRANE PROCESS; NF MEMBRANES; OLIVE MILL WASTEWATERS; OLIVE STONES; OXIDATION PRE-TREATMENT; PRE-TREATMENT; PRE-TREATMENTS; PRETREATMENT METHODS; PRODUCTION PROCESS; RO MEMBRANE; STABLE FLOWS; WASTEWATER REUSE;

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; EFFLUENTS; FLOCCULATION; NANOFILTRATION; POLYMERIC MEMBRANES; PURIFICATION; REVERSE OSMOSIS; WATER FILTRATION;

WASTEWATER RECLAMATION;

EID: 84869869405     PISSN: 02552701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2012.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Garrido Hoyos S.E., Martínez Nieto L., Camacho Rubio F., Ramos Cormenzana A. Kinetics of aerobic treatment of olive mill wastewater (OMW) with Aspergillus terreus. Process Biochemistry 2002, 37(10):1169-1176.
2. Rozzi A., Limoni N., Menegatti S., Boari G., Liberti L., Passino R. Influence of Na and Ca alkalinity on UASB treatment of olive mill effluents. Part 1. Preliminary results. Process Chemistry 1988, 23:86-90.
3. Di Giovacchino L. Caratteristiche delle acque di vegetazione delle olive. Nota 1, La Rivista Italiana delle Sostanze Grasse 1985, 62:411.
4. Voreadou K. Olive mill wastewater: a trial for the water ecosystems. Proceedings of Symposium on Treatment of Wastes from Olive Mills 1989.
5. Israelites C., Galiatsatou P., Iconomou D., Arapoglou D., Vartzakas T., Panagou S. Presentation of an EU program on the integrated approach to sustainable olive oil and table olives production (INASOOP). Proc. 3rd Eur. Bioremediation Conf., Chania 2005, 164.
6. Annesini M., Gironi F. Olive oil mill effluent: ageing effects on evaporation behavior. Water Research 1991, 25:1157-1960.
7. Paraskeva P., Diamadopoulos E. Technologies for olive mill wastewater treatment: a review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 2006, 81:1475-1485.
8. Cegarra J., Paredes C., Roig A., Bernal M.P., García D. Use of olive mill wastewater compost for crop production. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 1996, 38(3-4):193-203.
9. Papadimitriou E.K., Chatjipavlidis I., Balis C. Application of composting to olive mill wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology 1997, 18(1):101-107.
10. Bouranis D.L., Vlyssides A.G., Drossopoulos J.B., Karvouni G. Some characteristics of a new organic soil conditioner from the co-composting of olive oil processing wastewater and solid residue. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 1995, 26:2461-2472.
11. Aktas E.S., Imre S., Esroy L. Characterization and lime treatment of olive mill wastewater. Water Research 2001, 35:2336-2340.
12. Al-Malah K., Azzam M.O.J., Abu-Lail N.I. Olive mills effluent (OME) wastewater post-treatment using activated clay. Separation and Purification Technology 2000, 20:225-234.
13. Marques I.P. Anaerobic digestion treatment of olive mill wastewater for effluent re-use in irrigation. Desalination 2001, 137:233-239.
14. Fountoulakis M.S., Dokianakis S.N., Kornaros M.E., Aggelis G.G., Lyberatos G. Removal of phenolics in olive mill wastewaters using the white-rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus. Water Research 2002, 36:4735-4744.
15. Ammary B.Y. Treatment of olive mill wastewater using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Desalination 2005, 177:157-165.
16. Bódalo A., Gómez J.L., Gómez E., Máximo F., Hidalgo A.M. Application of reverse osmosis to reduce pollutants present in industrial wastewater. Desalination 2003, 155:101-108.
17. López J., Coello M.D., Quiroga J.M. Comparative studies of reverse osmosis membranes for wastewater reclamation. Desalination 2006, 191:137-147.
18. Vyas H.K., Bennett R.J., Marshall A.D. Performance of cross flow MF during constant TMP and constant flux operations. International Dairy Journal 2002, 12:473-479.
19. Stoller M. On the effect of flocculation as pretreatment process and particle size distribution for membrane fouling reduction. Desalination 2009, 240:209-217.
20. Greenberg A.E., Clesceri L.S., Eaton A.D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1992, APHA/AWWA/WEF, Cabs., Washington, DC. 16th ed.
21. Ochando-Pulido J.M., Rodriguez-Vives S., Martinez-Ferez A. The effect of permeate recirculation on the depuration of pretreated olive mill wastewater through reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2012, 286:145-154.
22. Martínez Nieto L., Hodaifa G., Rodríguez Vives J.A., Giménez Casares J., Ochando Degradation of organic matter in olive oil mill wastewater through homogeneous Fenton-like reaction. Chemical Engineering Journal 2011, 173(2):503-510.
23. Martínez Nieto L., Hodaifa G., Rodríguez Vives J.A., Giménez Casares J., Ochando Flocculation-sedimentation combined with chemical oxidation process. Clean-Soil, Air and Water 2011, 39(10):949-955.
24. Martínez Nieto L., Ben Driss Alami S., Hodaifa G., Faur C., Rodríguez Vives S., Giménez Casares J.A., Ochando J. Adsorption of iron on crude olive stones. Industrial Crops and Products 2010, 32:467-471.
25. Hoek E.M.V., Elimelech M. Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. Environmental Science and Technology 2003, 37:5581-5588.
26. Lee Jae-Wook, Kwon Tae-Ouk, Moon Il-Shik Performance of polyamide reverse osmosis membranes for steel wastewater reuse. Desalination 2006, 189:309-322.
27. Goosen M., Sablani S., Al-Maskari S., Al-Belushi R., Wilf M. Effect of feed temperature on permeate flux and mass transfer coefficient in spiral-wound reverse osmosis systems. Desalination 2002, 144:367-372.
28. Mukherjee P., Sengupta A.K. Ion exchange selectivity as a surrogate indicator of relative permeability of ions in reverse osmosis processes. Environmental Science and Technology 2003, 37:1432-1440.
29. Jin X., Jawor A., Kim S., Hoek E. Effects of feed water temperature on separation performance and organic fouling of brackish water RO membranes. Desalination 2009, 239:346-359.
30. Stoller M. Technical optimization of a dual ultrafiltration and nanofiltration pilot plant in batch operation by means of the critical flux theory: a case study. Chemical Engineering and Processing 2008, 47:1165-1170.
31. Pizzichini M., Russo C., Di Meo C. Purification of pulp and paper wastewater with membrane technology for water reuse in a closed loop. Desalination 2005, 178:351-359.
32. Cheryan M. UF and MF Handbook 1998, Technomics, Lancaster, PA.
33. Stoller M. Effective fouling inhibition by critical flux based optimization methods on a NF membrane module for olive mill wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal 2011, 168:1140-1148.
34. Winfield B. A study of the factors affecting the rate of fouling of reverse osmosis membranes treating secondary sewage effluents. Water Research 1979, 13:565-569.
35. Gwon E., Yu M., Oh H., Ylee Y. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater. Water Research 2003, 37:2989-2997.
36. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. Journal of Membrane Science 1995, 100:259-272.
37. Field R.W., Pearce G.K. Critical, sustainable and threshold fluxes for membrane filtration with water industry applications. Advanced Colloid Interface Science 2011, 164:38-44.