Improving phosphopeptide identification in shotgun proteomics by supervised filtering of peptide-spectrum matches

2013 ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedical Informatics, ACM-BCB 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 316-323

  Li, Sujun ^a   Arnold, Randy J ^a   Tang, Haixu ^a   Radivojac, Predrag ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Machine learning; Phosphorylation; Posttranslational modification; Proteomics; Tandem mass spectrometry

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL PROTOCOLS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELING; PEPTIDE-SPECTRUM MATCH (PSM); PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATIONS; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ALGORITHMS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; LEARNING SYSTEMS; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PEPTIDES; PHOSPHORYLATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEARCH ENGINES;

BIOINFORMATICS;

EID: 84888151941     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2506583.2506634     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Walsh, C.T., Posttranslational modification of proteins: expanding nature's inventory. 2006, Roberts and Co. Publishers.
2. Gsponer, J., et al., Tight regulation of unstructured proteins: from transcript synthesis to protein degradation. Science, 2008. 322(5906): 1365-8.
3. Iakoucheva, L.M., et al., The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res, 2004. 32(3): 1037-49.
4. Johnson, L.N. and R.J. Lewis, Structural basis for control by phosphorylation. Chem Rev, 2001. 101(8): 2209-42.
5. Xin, F. and P. Radivojac, Post-translational modifications induce significant yet not extreme changes to protein structure. Bioinformatics, 2012. 28(22): 2905-13.
6. Nussinov, R., et al., Allosteric post-translational modification codes. Trends Biochem Sci, 2012. 37(10): 447-55.
7. Landry, C.R., E.D. Levy, and S.W. Michnick, Weak functional constraints on phosphoproteomes. Trends Genet, 2009. 25(5): 193-7.
8. Gray, V.E. and S. Kumar, Rampant purifying selection conserves positions with posttranslational modifications in human proteins. Mol Biol Evol, 2011. 28(5): 1565-8.
9. Gnad, F., et al., High-accuracy identification and bioinformatic analysis of in vivo protein phosphorylation sites in yeast. Proteomics, 2009. 9(20): 4642-52.
10. Gnad, F., et al., Evolutionary constraints of phosphorylation in eukaryotes, prokaryotes, and mitochondria. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2010. 9(12): 2642-53.
11. Gnad, F., J. Gunawardena, and M. Mann, PHOSIDA 2011: The posttranslational modification database. Nucleic Acids Res, 2011. 39(Database issue): D253-60.
12. Bodenmiller, B., et al., PhosphoPep-a database of protein phosphorylation sites in model organisms. Nat Biotechnol, 2008. 26(12): 1339-1340.
13. Eisenhaber, B. and F. Eisenhaber, Prediction of posttranslational modification of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Methods Mol Biol, 2010. 609: 365-84.
14. Li, S., et al., Loss of post-translational modification sites in disease. Pac Symp Biocomput, 2010: 337-47.
15. Mort, M., et al., In silico functional profiling of human disease-associated and polymorphic amino acid substitutions. Hum Mutat, 2010. 31(3): 335-46.
16. Radivojac, P., et al., Gain and loss of phosphorylation sites in human cancer. Bioinformatics, 2008. 24(16): i241-7.
17. Li, B., et al., Automated inference of molecular mechanisms of disease from amino acid substitutions. Bioinformatics, 2009. 25(21): 2744-2750.
18. Hata, J.A. and W.J. Koch, Phosphorylation of G proteincoupled receptors: GPCR kinases in heart disease. Mol Interv, 2003. 3(5): 264-72.
19. Buee, L., et al., Tau protein isoforms, phosphorylation and role in neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Res Brain Res Rev, 2000. 33(1): 95-130.
20. lsen, J.V. and M. Mann, Improved peptide identification in proteomics by two consecutive stages of mass spectrometric fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004. 101(37): 13417-22.
21. Domon, B. and R. Aebersold, Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science, 2006. 312(5771): 212-7.
22. Witze, E.S., et al., Mapping protein post-translational modifications with mass spectrometry. Nat Methods, 2007. 4(10): 798-806.
23. Perkins, D.N., et al., Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis, 1999. 20(18): 3551-67.
24. Eng, J.K., A.L. McCormack, and J.R. Yates 3rd, An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 1994. 5: 976-989.
25. Ruse, C.I., et al., Motif-specific sampling of phosphoproteomes. J Proteome Res, 2008. 7(5): 2140-50.
26. eausoleil, S.A., et al., Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004. 101(33): 12130-5.
27. Berry, N.B., M. Fan, and K.P. Nephew, Estrogen receptoralpha hinge-region lysines 302 and 303 regulate receptor degradation by the proteasome. Mol Endocrinol, 2008. 22(7): 1535-51.
28. Tanner, S., et al., Accurate annotation of peptide modifications through unrestrictive database search. J Proteome Res, 2008. 7(1): 170-181.
29. Martin, D.M., et al., Prophossi: Automating expert validation of phosphopeptide-spectrum matches from tandem mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics, 2010. 26(17): 2153-9.
30. Lu, B., et al., Automatic validation of phosphopeptide identifications from tandem mass spectra. Anal Chem, 2007. 79(4): 1301-10.
31. Olsen, J.V., et al., Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell, 2006. 127(3): 635-48.
32. eausoleil, S.A., et al., A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat Biotechnol, 2006. 24(10): 1285-92.
33. Ruttenberg, B.E., et al., PhosphoScore: An open-source phosphorylation site assignment tool for MSn data. J Proteome Res, 2008. 7(7): 3054-9.
34. Villen, J., et al., Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of mouse liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007. 104(5): 1488- 93.
35. Manning, G., et al., The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science, 2002. 298(5600): 1912-34.
36. Obenauer, J.C., L.C. Cantley, and M.B. Yaffe, Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res, 2003. 31(13): 3635-3641.
37. Blom, N., S. Gammeltoft, and S. Brunak, Sequence and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. J Mol Biol, 1999. 294(5): 1351-62.
38. Ahmad, W., et al., Serine 204 phosphorylation and O-beta- GlcNAC interplay of IGFBP-6 as therapeutic indicator to regulate IGF-II functions in viral mediated hepatocellular carcinoma. Virol J, 2011. 8: 208.
39. Xu, H., et al., Toward a complete in silico, multi-layered embryonic stem cell regulatory network. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med, 2010. 2(6): 708-33.
40. Whisenant, T.C., et al., Computational prediction and experimental verification of new MAP kinase docking sites and substrates including Gli transcription factors. PLoS Comput Biol, 2010. 6(8).
41. Iliuk, A.B., et al., In-depth analyses of kinase-dependent tyrosine phosphoproteomes based on metal ionfunctionalized soluble nanopolymers. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2010. 9(10): 2162-72.
42. Kim, M.S., et al., Systematic evaluation of alternating CID and ETD fragmentation for phosphorylated peptides. Proteomics, 2011. 11(12): 2568-72.
43. Golub, G.H. and C.F. Van Loan, Matrix computations. 3rd ed. 1996, Johns Hopkins University Press.