Comparative analysis of two venipuncture learning methods on nursing students

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 15-18

  Bitsika, Eleni ^a   Karlis, George ^b   Iacovidou, Nicoletta ^c   Georgiou, Marios ^d   Kontodima, Panagiota ^e   Vardaki, Zambia ^f   Xanthos, Theodoros ^c  

^a General Hospital of Sparti   (Greece)

^b SISMANOGLIO HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^d NICOSIA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Cyprus)

^e ONASSIS CARDIAC SURGERY CENTER   (Greece)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WEST ATTICA   (Greece)

Author keywords

2 stage methodology; 4 stage methodology; Intravenous cannulation; Skill acquisition; Skill retention; Teaching

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GREECE; HUMAN; LEARNING; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; PHLEBOTOMY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EDUCATION, NURSING; GREECE; HUMANS; LEARNING; PHLEBOTOMY; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 84888130357     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: 15322793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Birch L., Jones N., Doyle P.M., et al. Obstetric skills drills: Evaluation of teaching methods. Nurse Education Today 2007, 27:915-922.
2. Bloomfield J.G., Jones A. Using e-learning to support clinical skills acquisition: Exploring the experiences and perceptions of graduate first-year pre-registration nursing students - A mixed method study. Nurse Education Today 2013, 33(12):1605-1611.
3. Borneuf A.M., Haigh C. The who and where of clinical skills teaching: a review from UK prospective. Nurse Education Today 2010, 30(2):197-201.
4. Bullok I. Skill acquisition in Resuscitation. Resuscitation 2000, 45(2):139-143.
5. Engum S.A., Jeffries P., Fisher L. Intravenous catheter training system: computer-based education versus traditional learning methods. American Journal of Surgery 2003, 186(1):67-74.
6. Greif R., Egger L., Basciani R.M., et al. Emergency skill training-a randomized controlled study of the effectiveness of the four stage approach compared to traditional clinical teaching. Resuscitation 2010, 81(12):1692-1697.
7. Hoke R.S., Handley A.J. A reference basic life support provider course for Europe. Resuscitation 2006, 69(3):413-419.
8. Koh L.C. Practice-based teaching and nurse education. Nursing Standard 2002, 16(19):38-42.
9. Mcleod P.J., Steinert Y., Trudel J., et al. Seven principles for teaching procedural and technical skills. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 2001, 76(10):1080.
10. Orde S., Celenza A., Pinder M. A randomized trial comparing a 4-stage to 2-stage teaching technique for laryngeal mask insertion. Resuscitation 2010, 81(12):1687-1691.
11. Reznek M.A., Rawn C.L., Krummel T.M. Evaluation of the educational effectiveness of a virtual reality intravenous insertion simulator. Academic Emergency Medicine 2002, 9(11):1319-1325.
12. Sotto J.A., Ayuste E.C., Bowyer M.W., et al. Exporting simulation technology to the Philippines: a comparative study of traditional versus simulation methods for teaching intravenous cannulation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2009, 142:346-351.
13. Wearne S. Teaching procedural skills in general practice. Australian Family Physician 2011, 40(1-2):63-67.