Microdeformation in wound healing

Wound Repair and Regeneration

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 793-799

  Wiegand, Cornelia ^a   White, Richard ^b  

^a JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WORCESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GROWTH FACTOR; SCLEROPROTEIN;

ANGIOGENESIS; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BIOPHYSICS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHRONIC WOUND; CONFERENCE PAPER; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBROBLAST; FORCE; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANICS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MICRODEFORMATION; MYOFIBROBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; SCAR FORMATION; TISSUE ENGINEERING; VACUUM ASSISTED CLOSURE; WOUND HEALING; CELL MOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; MALE; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; MIDDLE AGED; OCCLUSIVE DRESSING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

CELL MOVEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; FEMALE; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; MALE; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MIDDLE AGED; MYOFIBROBLASTS; NEGATIVE-PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY; OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WOUND HEALING; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84888127767     PISSN: 10671927     EISSN: 1524475X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12111     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (59)

1. Tomei AA, Boschetti F, Gervaso F, Swartz M,. 3D collagen cultures under well-defined dynamic strain: a novel strain device with a porous elastomeric support. Biotech Bioeng 2008; 103: 217-225.
2. Raeber GP, Mayer J, Hubbel JA,. Part I: a novel in-vitro system for simultaneous mechanical stimulation and time-lapse microscopy in 3D. Biomechan Model Mechanibiol 2008; 7: 203-214.
3. Alenghat FJ, Ingber DE,. Mechanotransduction: all signals point to cytoskeleton, matrix, and integrins. Sci STKE 2002; 119: PE6.
4. Wells RG,. The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology 2008; 47: 1394-1400.
5. Saxena V, Hwang CW, Huang S, Eichbaum Q, Ingber D, Orgill DP,. Vacuum-assisted closure: microdeformations of wounds and cell proliferation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 1086-1096.
6. Atance J, Yost M, Carver W,. Influence of the extracellular matrix on the regulation of cardiac fibroblast behavior by mechanical stretch. J Cell Physiol 2004; 200: 377-386.
7. Huang S, Ingber DE,. The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control. Nat Cell Biol 1999; 1: E131-138.
8. Martinac B, Buechner M, Delcour AH, Adler J, Kung C,. Pressure-sensitive ion channel in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987; 84: 2297-2301.
9. Ingber DE,. Tensegrity-based machanosensing from macro to micro. Progr Biophys Mol Biol 2008; 97: 163-179.
10. Kung C,. A possible unifying principle for mechanosensation. Nature 2005; 436: 647-654.
11. Katsumi A, Orr AW, Tzima E, Schwartz MA,. Integrins in mechanotransduction. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 12001-12004.
12. Ingber DE,. Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Ann Rev Physiol 1997; 59: 575-599.
13. Saxena V, Orgill D, Kohane I,. A set of genes previously implicated in the hypoxia response might be an important modulator in the rat ear tissue response to mechanical stretch. BMG Genomics 2007; 8: 430.
14. Barrick B, Campbell EJ, Owen CA,. Leukocyte proteinases in wound healing: roles in physiologic and pathologic processes. Wound Repair Regen 1999; 7: 410-422.
15. Trengove NJ, Stacey MC, Macauley S, Bennett N, Gibson J, Burslem F, et al. Analysis of the acute and chronic wound environments: the role of proteases and their inhibitors. Wound Repair Regen 1999; 7: 442-452.
16. Yager DR, Nwomeh BC,. The proteolytic environment of the chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 1999; 7: 433-441.
17. He C, Hughes MA, Cherry GW, Arnold F,. Effects of chronic wound fluid on the bioactivity of platelet-derived growth factor in serum-free medium and its direct effect on fibroblast growth. Wound Repair Regen 1999; 7: 97-105.
18. Yager DR, Chen SM, Ward SI, Olutoye OO, Diegelmann RF, Cohen K,. Ability of chronic wound fluids to degrade peptide growth factors is associated with increased levels of elastase activity and diminished levels of proteinase inhibitors. Wound Repair Regen 1997; 5: 23-32.
19. Harris IR, Yee CE, Walters CE, Cunliffe WJ, Kearney JN, Wood EJ, et al. Cytokine and protease levels in healing and non-healing chronic venous leg ulcers. Exp Dermatol 1995; 4: 342-349.
20. James TJ, Hughes MA, Cherry GW, Taylor PT,. Evidence of oxidative stress in chronic venous ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2003; 11: 172-176.
21. Morykwas MJ, Faler BJ, Pearce DJ, Argenta LC,. Effects of varying levels of subatmosphereic pressure on the rate of granulation tissue formation in experimental wounds in swine. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47: 547-551.
22. Gustaffson R, Sjögren J, Ingemansson R,. Understanding topical negative pressure therapy. In EWMA position document: Topical negative pressure in wound management. 2007. 2-4.
23. Isago T, Nozaki M, Kikuchi Y, Honda T, Nakazawa H,. Effects of different negative pressures on reduction of wounds in negative pressure wound dressings. J Dermatol 2003; 30: 569-601.
24. Jacobs S, Simhaee DA, Marsano A, Fomovsky GM, Niedt G, Wu JK,. Efficacy and mechanisms of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in promoting wound healing: a rodent model. J Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 62: 1331-1338.
25. Zhou M, Yu A, Wu G, Xia C, Hu X, Qi B,. Role of different negative pressure values in the proves of infected wounds healing treated by vacuum-assisted closure: an experimental study. Int Wound J 2012 May 29 [Epub ahead of print].
26. Scherer SS, Pietramaggiori G, Mathews JC, Orgill DP,. Short periodic applications of the vacuum-assisted closure device cause an extended tissue response in the diabetic mouse model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 1458-1465.
27. Moues CM, van Toorenenbergen AW, Heule F, Hop WC, Hovius SER,. The role of topical negative pressure in wound repair: expression of biochemical markers in wound fluid during wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2008; 16: 488-494.
28. Scherer SS, Pietramaggiori G, Mathews JC, Prsa MJ, Huang S, Orgill DP,. The mechanism of action of the vacuum-assisted closure device. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 786-797.
29. Kane BJ, Younan G, Helm D, Dastouri P, Prentice-Mott H, Irimia D, et al. Controlled induction of distributed microdeformation in wounded tissue via a microchanber array dressing. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 95A: 333-340.
30. Borgquist O, Gustafsson L, Ingemansson R, Malmsjö M,. Micro- and macromechanical effects on the wound bed of negative pressure wound therapy using gauze and foam. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64: 789-793.
31. Lu F, Ogawa R, Nguyen DT, Chen B, Guo D, Helm DL, et al. Microdeformation of three-dimensional cultured fibroblasts induces gene expression and morphological changes. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66: 296-300.
32. Silver FH, Siperko LM,. Mechanosensing and mechanochemical transduction: how is mechanical energy sensed and converted into chemical energy in an extracellular matrix? Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2003; 31: 255-331.
33. Lavery LA, Barnes SA, Keith MS, Seaman JW, Armstrong DG,. Prediction of healing for postoperative diabetic foot wounds based on early wound area progression. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 26-29.
34. Erba P, Ogawa R, Ackermann M, Adini A, Miele LF, Dastouri P, et al. Angiogenesis in wounds treated by microdeformational wound therapy. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 402-409.
35. Susilo ME, Roeder BA, Voytik-Harbin SL, Kokini K, Nauman EA,. Development of a three-dimensional unit cell to model the micromechanical response of a collagen-based extracellular matrix. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 1471-1486.
36. Schwarz US, Bischofs IB,. Physical deterninants of cell organization in soft media. Med Eng Phys 2005; 27: 763-772.
37. Kole TP, Tseng Y, Jiang I, Katz JL, Wirtz D,. Intracellular mechanics of migrating fibroblasts. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16: 328-338.
38. Cutting K, White R, Hoekstra H,. Topical silver-impregnated dressings and the importance of the dressing technology. Int Wound J 2009; 6: 396-402.
39. Culbertson EJ, Xing L, Wen Y, Franz MG,. Loss of mechanical strain impairs abdominal wall fibroblast proliferation, orientation and collagen contraction function. Surgery 2011; 150: 410-417.
40. Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Mirzabeigi MN, Wang GJ, Foley PJ, Wu LC, et al. Prophylactic muscle flaps in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 1081-1086.
41. Snyder RJ,. Managing dead space: an overview-eliminating these unwanted areas is a key to successful wound healing. Podiatry Manage 2005; 24: 171-174.
42. Edberg SC,. Methods of quantitative microbiological analyses that support the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of human infection. Crit Rev Microbiol 1981; 8: 339-397.
43. Heit YI, Dastouri P, Helm DL, Pietramaggiori G, Younan G, Erba P, et al. Foam Pore Size is a critical interface parameter of suction-based wound healing devices. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 589-597.
44. Reinke JM, Sorg H,. Wound repair and regeneration. Eur Surg Res 2012; 49: 35-43.
45. Sandbo N, Dulin N,. Actin cytoskeleton in myofibroblast differentiation: ultrastructure defining form and driving function. Transl Res 2011; 158: 181-196.
46. Schwarz F, Jennewein M, Bubel M, Holstein JH, Pohlemann T, Oberringer M,. Soft tissue fibroblasts from well healing and chronic human wounds show different rates of myofibroblasts in vitro. Mol Biol Rep 2013; 40: 1721-1733.
47. Schulze C, Wetzel F, Kueper T, Malsen A, Muhr G, Jaspers S, et al. Stiffening of human skin fibroblasts with age. Biophys J 2010; 99: 2434-2442.
48. Zou JP, Huang S, Pen Y, Liu HW, Cheng B, Fu XB, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells/multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs): potential role in healing cutaneous chronic wounds. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2012; 11: 244-253.
49. Maxson S, Lopez EA, Yoo D, Danilkovitch-Miagkova A, LeRoux MA,. Role of Mesenchymal stem cells in wound repair. Stem Cells Transl Med 2012; 1: 142-149.
50. Rodriguez-Menocal L, Salgado M, Ford D, van Badiavas E,. Stimulation of skin and wound fibroblast migration by mesenchymal stem cells derived from normal donors and chronic wound patients. Stem Cells Transl Med 2012; 1: 221-229.
51. Kapetanaki MG, Mora AL, Rojas M,. Influence of age on wound healing and fibrosis. J Pathol 2013; 229: 310-322.
52. Jackson WM, Nesti LJ, Tuan RS,. Clinical translation of wound healing therapies based on mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 2012; 1: 44-50.
53. Sun Y, Fu J,. Mechanobiology: a new frontier for human pluripotent stem cells. Integr Biol 2013. doi: 10.1039/c2ib20256e.
54. Wang JH, Li B,. Mechanics rules cell biology. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2010; 2: 16.
55. Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, Hobbs FD, Ramelet AA, Shakespeare PG, et al. International clinical recommendations on scar management. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 560-571.
56. Aarabi S, Bhatt KA, Shi Y, Paterno J, Chang EI, Loh SA, et al. Mechanical load initiates hypertrophic scar formation through decreased cellular apoptosis. FASEB J 2007; 21: 3250-3261.
57. Wong VW, Paterno J, Sorkin M, Glotzbach JP, Levi K, Januszyk M, et al. Mechanical force prolong acute inflammation via T-cell-dependent pathways during scar formation. FASEB J 2011; 25: 4498-4510.
58. Wynn TA,. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J Pathol 2008; 214: 199-210.
59. Wynn TA,. Common and unique mechanisms regulate fibrosis in various fibroproliferative diseases. J Clin Invest 2007; 117: 524-529.