Controlled induction of distributed microdeformation in wounded tissue via a microchamber array dressing

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 95 A, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 333-340

  Kane, Bartholomew J ^a   Younan, George ^b   Helm, Douglas ^b   Dastouri, Pouya ^b   Prentice Mott, Harrison ^c   Irimia, Daniel ^c   Chan, Rodney K ^b   Toner, Mehmet ^c   Orgill, Dennis P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

microfabrication; microfluidic devices; micromechanical forces; negative pressure wound therapy; wound healing

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR RESPONSE; DERMAL WOUND HEALING; LIVING CELL; MECHANICAL SIGNALS; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; MECHANICAL STIMULUS; MECHANO-BIOLOGY; MICRO-CHAMBERS; MICROCHAMBER ARRAY; MICRODEFORMATIONS; MICROFABRICATED; MICROFLUIDIC DEVICES; MICROMECHANICAL FORCES; NEGATIVE PRESSURES; SILICONE RUBBER; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TISSUE DEFORMATIONS; WOUND HEALING; WOUND TISSUE;

DEFORMATION; FLUIDIC DEVICES; MAMMALS; MICROANALYSIS; MICROCHANNELS; MICROFABRICATION; MICROFLUIDICS; MICROMACHINING; PLANTS (BOTANY); SILICONES; VACUUM;

TISSUE;

SILICONE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMIS; MALE; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SKIN INJURY; TISSUE INJURY; VACUUM; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING; WOUND TISSUE DEFORMATION;

ANIMALS; BANDAGES; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICROFLUIDICS; SKIN; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 78649283788     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32840     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Janmey PA, McCulloch CA,. Cell mechanics: Integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2007; 9: 1-34.
2. Ingber DE,. Cellular mechanotransduction: Putting all the pieces together again. FASEB J 2006; 20: 811-827.
3. Ai-Aql ZS, Alagl AS, Graves DT, Gerstenfeld LC, Einhorn TA,. Molecular mechanisms controlling bone formation during fracture healing and distraction osteogenesis. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 107-118.
4. Bouletreau PJ, Warren SM, Longaker MT,. The molecular biology of distraction osteogenesis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2002; 30: 1-11.
5. De Filippo RE, Atala A,. Stretch and growth: The molecular and physiologic influences of tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 2450-2462.
6. Takei T, Mills I, Arai K, Sumpio BE,. Molecular basis for tissue expansion: Clinical implications for the surgeon. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 247-258.
7. Martinac B, Buechner M, Delcour AH, Adler J, Kung C,. Pressure-sensitive ion channel in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987; 84: 2297-2301.
8. Ingber DE,. Tensegrity-based mechanosensing from macro to micro. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2008; 97: 163-179.
9. Kung C,. A possible unifying principle for mechanosensation. Nature 2005; 436: 647-654.
10. Wang N, Tytell JD, Ingber DE,. Mechanotransduction at a distance: Mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10: 75-82.
11. Ingber DE,. Tensegrity and mechanotransduction. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2008; 12: 198-200.
12. Wells RG,. The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology 2008; 47: 1394-1400.
13. Atance J, Yost MJ, Carver W,. Influence of the extracellular matrix on the regulation of cardiac fibroblast behavior by mechanical stretch. J Cell Physiol 2004; 200: 377-386.
14. Chin MS, Lancerotto L, Helm DL, Dastouri P, Prsa MJ, Ottensmeyer M, Akaishi S, Orgill DP, Ogawa R,. Analysis of neuropeptides in stretched skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 102-113.
15. Daya M, Nair V,. Traction-assisted dermatogenesis by serial intermittent skin tape application. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 1047-1054.
16. Holle G, Germann G, Sauerbier M, Riedel K, von Gregory H, Pelzer M,. Vacuum-assisted closure therapy and wound coverage in soft tissue injury. Clinical use. Unfallchirurg 2007; 110: 289-300.
17. Orgill DP, Manders EK, Sumpio BE, Lee RC, Attinger CE, Gurtner GC, Ehrlich HP,. The mechanisms of action of vacuum assisted closure: More to learn. Surgery 2009; 146: 40-51.
18. McNulty AK, Schmidt M, Feeley T, Kieswetter K,. Effects of negative pressure wound therapy on fibroblast viability, chemotactic signaling, and proliferation in a provisional wound (fibrin) matrix. Wound Repair Regen 2007; 15: 838-846.
19. Pietramaggiori G, Liu P, Scherer SS, Kaipainen A, Prsa MJ, Mayer H, Newalder J, Alperovich M, Mentzer SJ, Konerding MA, Huang S, Ingber DE, Orgill DP,. Tensile forces stimulate vascular remodeling and epidermal cell proliferation in living skin. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 896-902.
20. Saxena V, Hwang CW, Huang S, Eichbaum Q, Ingber D, Orgill DP,. Vacuum-assisted closure: Microdeformations of wounds and cell proliferation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 1086-1096; discussion 1097-1098.
21. Greene AK, Puder M, Roy R, Arsenault D, Kwei S, Moses MA, Orgill DP,. Microdeformational wound therapy: Effects on angiogenesis and matrix metalloproteinases in chronic wounds of 3 debilitated patients. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56: 418-422.
22. Scherer SS, Pietramaggiori G, Mathews JC, Prsa MJ, Huang S, Orgill DP,. The mechanism of action of the vacuum-assisted closure device. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 786-797.
23. Morykwas MJ, Simpson J, Punger K, Argenta A, Kremers L, Argenta J,. Vacuum-assisted closure: State of basic research and physiologic foundation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (7 Suppl): 121S-126S.
24. Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W,. Vacuum-assisted closure: A new method for wound control and treatment: Animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 553-562.
25. Wikswo JP, Prokop A, Baudenbacher F, Cliffel D, Csukas B, Velkovsky M,. Engineering challenges of BioNEMS: The integration of microfluidics, micro- and nanodevices, models and external control for systems biology. IEE Proc Nanobiotechnol 2006; 153: 81-101.
26. Helmke BP, Minerick AR,. Designing a nano-interface in a microfluidic chip to probe living cells: Challenges and perspectives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 6419-6424.
27. Jeon NL,. BioMEMS: Forging new collaborations between biologists and engineers. J Vis Exp 2007; 9: 411.
28. Kartalov EP, Walker C, Taylor CR, Anderson WF, Scherer A,. Microfluidic vias enable nested bioarrays and autoregulatory devices in Newtonian fluids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 12280-12284.
29. Piccin E, Coltro WK, Fracassi da Silva JA, Neto SC, Mazo LH, Carrilho E,. Polyurethane from biosource as a new material for fabrication of microfluidic devices by rapid prototyping. J Chromatogr A 2007; 1173: 151-158.
30. Kuncova-Kallio J, Kallio PJ,. PDMS and its suitability for analytical microfluidic devices. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006; 1: 2486-2489.