Quantitative accuracy in mass spectrometry based proteomics of complex samples: The impact of labeling and precursor interference

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 96, Issue , 2014, Pages 133-144

  Sandberg, AnnSofi ^a   Branca, Rui M M ^a   Lehtiö, Janne ^a   Forshed, Jenny ^a  

^a SCIENCE FOR LIFE LABORATORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

ITRAQ; Label free; Precursor mixing; Quantification; TMT

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; PROTEOME;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CELL LYSATE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FRACTIONATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; ION CURRENT; ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING; LIMIT OF DETECTION; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PRECURSOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN TARGETING; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ITRAQ; LABEL-FREE; PRECURSOR MIXING; QUANTIFICATION; TMT;

CELL LINE, TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84888121565     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.10.035     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Nesvizhskii A.I., Aebersold R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:1419-1440.
2. Aebersold R. A stress test for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Methods 2009, 6:411-412.
3. Nilsson T., Mann M., Aebersold R., Yates J.R., Bairoch A., Bergeron J.J. Mass spectrometry in high-throughput proteomics: ready for the big time. Nat Methods 2010, 7:681-685.
4. Hanash S.M., Baik C.S., Kallioniemi O. Emerging molecular biomarkers-blood-based strategies to detect and monitor cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011, 8:142-150.
5. Hanash S. Disease proteomics. Nature 2003, 422:226-232.
6. Thompson A., Schafer J., Kuhn K., Kienle S., Schwarz J., Schmidt G., et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal Chem 2003, 75:1895-1904.
7. Ross P.L., Huang Y.N., Marchese J.N., Williamson B., Parker K., Hattan S., et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004, 3:1154-1169.
8. Michalski A., Cox J., Mann M. More than 100,000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC-MS/MS. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:1785-1793.
9. Houel S., Abernathy R., Renganathan K., Meyer-Arendt K., Ahn N.G., Old W.M. Quantifying the impact of chimera MS/MS spectra on peptide identification in large-scale proteomics studies. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:4152-4160.
10. Karp N.A., Huber W., Sadowski P.G., Charles P.D., Hester S.V., Lilley K.S. Addressing accuracy and precision issues in iTRAQ quantitation. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:1885-1897.
11. Bantscheff M., Boesche M., Eberhard D., Matthieson T., Sweetman G., Kuster B. Robust and sensitive iTRAQ quantification on an LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:1702-1713.
12. Ow S.Y., Salim M., Noirel J., Evans C., Rehman I., Wright P.C. iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: "the good, the bad and the ugly". J Proteome Res 2009, 8:5347-5355.
13. Altelaar A.F., Frese C.K., Preisinger C., Hennrich M.L., Schram A.W., Timmers H.T., et al. Benchmarking stable isotope labeling based quantitative proteomics. J Proteomics 2013, 88:14-26.
14. Mertins P., Udeshi N.D., Clauser K.R., Mani D.R., Patel J., Ong S.E., et al. iTRAQ labeling is superior to mTRAQ for quantitative global proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012, 11. [M111 014423].
15. Wang H., Alvarez S., Hicks L.M. Comprehensive comparison of iTRAQ and label-free LC-based quantitative proteomics approaches using two Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains of interest for biofuels engineering. J Proteome Res 2012, 11:487-501.
16. Ow S.Y., Salim M., Noirel J., Evans C., Wright P.C. Minimising iTRAQ ratio compression through understanding LC-MS elution dependence and high-resolution HILIC fractionation. Proteomics 2011, 11:2341-2346.
17. Savitski M.M., Sweetman G., Askenazi M., Marto J.A., Lang M., Zinn N., et al. Delayed fragmentation and optimized isolation width settings for improvement of protein identification and accuracy of isobaric mass tag quantification on Orbitrap-type mass spectrometers. Anal Chem 2011, 83:8959-8967.
18. Christoforou A., Lilley K.S. Taming the isobaric tagging elephant in the room in quantitative proteomics. Nat Methods 2011, 8:911-913.
19. Ting L., Rad R., Gygi S.P., Haas W. MS3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric multiplexed quantitative proteomics. Nat Methods 2011, 8:937-940.
20. Wenger C.D., Lee M.V., Hebert A.S., McAlister G.C., Phanstiel D.H., Westphall M.S., et al. Gas-phase purification enables accurate, multiplexed proteome quantification with isobaric tagging. Nat Methods 2011, 8:933-935.
21. Savitski M.M., Mathieson T., Zinn N., Sweetman G., Doce C., Becher I., et al. Measuring and managing ratio compression for accurate iTRAQ/TMT quantification. J Proteome Res 2013, 12:3586-3598.
22. Chelius D., Bondarenko P.V. Quantitative profiling of proteins in complex mixtures using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2002, 1:317-323.
23. Wiener M.C., Sachs J.R., Deyanova E.G., Yates N.A. Differential mass spectrometry: a label-free LC-MS method for finding significant differences in complex peptide and protein mixtures. Anal Chem 2004, 76:6085-6096.
24. Eriksson H., Lengqvist J., Hedlund J., Uhlen K., Orre L.M., Bjellqvist B., et al. Quantitative membrane proteomics applying narrow range peptide isoelectric focusing for studies of small cell lung cancer resistance mechanisms. Proteomics 2008, 8:3008-3018.
25. Lengqvist J., Uhlen K., Lehtio J. iTRAQ compatibility of peptide immobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusing. Proteomics 2007, 7:1746-1752.
26. Arabi A., Ullah K., Branca R.M., Johansson J., Bandarra D., Haneklaus M., et al. Proteomic screen reveals Fbw7 as a modulator of the NF-kappaB pathway. Nat Commun 2012, 3:976.
27. Kocher T., Pichler P., Schutzbier M., Stingl C., Kaul A., Teucher N., et al. High precision quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ on an LTQ Orbitrap: a new mass spectrometric method combining the benefits of all. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:4743-4752.
28. Eng J.K., Mccormack A.L., Yates J.R. An approach to correlate tandem mass-spectral data of peptides with amino-acid-sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 1994, 5:976-989.
29. Kall L., Canterbury J.D., Weston J., Noble W.S., MacCoss M.J. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat Methods 2007, 4:923-925.
30. Cox J., Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:1367-1372.
31. Luber C.A., Cox J., Lauterbach H., Fancke B., Selbach M., Tschopp J., et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals subset-specific viral recognition in dendritic cells. Immunity 2010, 32:279-289.
32. Nagaraj N., Mann M. Quantitative analysis of the intra- and inter-individual variability of the normal urinary proteome. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:637-645.
33. Papakostas S., Vasemagi A., Vaha J.P., Himberg M., Peil L., Primmer C.R. A proteomics approach reveals divergent molecular responses to salinity in populations of European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus). Mol Ecol 2012, 21:3516-3530.
34. Cox J., Neuhauser N., Michalski A., Scheltema R.A., Olsen J.V., Mann M. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:1794-1805.
35. Hulsen T., de Vlieg J., Alkema W. BioVenn - a web application for the comparison and visualization of biological lists using area-proportional Venn diagrams. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:488.
36. Li Z., Adams R.M., Chourey K., Hurst G.B., Hettich R.L., Pan C. Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos. J Proteome Res 2012, 11:1582-1590.
37. Pichler P., Kocher T., Holzmann J., Mazanek M., Taus T., Ammerer G., et al. Peptide labeling with isobaric tags yields higher identification rates using iTRAQ 4-plex compared to TMT 6-plex and iTRAQ 8-plex on LTQ Orbitrap. Anal Chem 2010, 82:6549-6558.
38. Beck M., Schmidt A., Malmstroem J., Claassen M., Ori A., Szymborska A., et al. The quantitative proteome of a human cell line. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:549.
39. Mann M., Kulak N.A., Nagaraj N., Cox J. The coming age of complete, accurate, and ubiquitous proteomes. Mol Cell 2013, 49:583-590.
40. Geiger T., Wehner A., Schaab C., Cox J., Mann M. Comparative proteomic analysis of eleven common cell lines reveals ubiquitous but varying expression of most proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012, 11. [M111 014050].
41. Lundberg E., Fagerberg L., Klevebring D., Matic I., Geiger T., Cox J., et al. Defining the transcriptome and proteome in three functionally different human cell lines. Mol Syst Biol 2010, 6:450.
42. Vizcaino J.A., Côté R.G., Csordas A., Dianes J.A., Fabregat A., Foster J.M., et al. The Proteomics Identifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D1063-D1069.