Minimising iTRAQ ratio compression through understanding LC-MS elution dependence and high-resolution HILIC fractionation

Proteomics

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2341-2346

  Ow, Saw Yen ^a   Salim, Malinda ^a   Noirel, Josselin ^a   Evans, Caroline ^a   Wright, Phillip C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ITRAQ proteomics; ITRAQ underestimation; MS MS mixing; Quantitative proteomics; Technology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, ION EXCHANGE; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; ISOTOPE LABELING; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 79956270174     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000752     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ross, P. L., Huang, Y. N., Marchese, J. N., Williamson, B. et al., Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3, 1154-1169.
2. Aggarwal, K., Choe, L. H., Lee, K. H., Shotgun proteomics using the iTRAQ isobaric tags. Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic. 2006, 5, 112-120.
3. Zieske, L. R., A perspective on the use of iTRAQ reagent technology for protein complex and profiling studies. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1501-1508.
4. Noirel, J., Evans, C., Salim, M., Mukherjee, J. et al., Methods in quantitative proteomics: setting iTRAQ on the right track. Curr. Proteomics 2011, 8, 17-30.
5. Yang, Y., Zhang, S., Howe, K., Wilson, D. B. et al., A comparison of nLC-ESI-MS/MS and nLC-MALDI-MS/MS for GeLC-based protein identification and iTRAQ-based shotgun quantitative proteomics. J. Biomol. Tech. 2007, 18, 226-237.
6. Griffin, T. J., Xie, H., Bandhakavi, S., Popko, J. et al., iTRAQ reagent-based quantitative proteomic analysis on a linear ion trap mass spectrometer. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 4200-4209.
7. Bantscheff, M., Boesche, M., Eberhard, D., Matthieson, T. et al., Robust and sensitive iTRAQ quantification on an LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 1702-1713.
8. Karp, N. A., Huber, W., Sadowski, P. G., Charles, P. D. et al., Addressing accuracy and precision issues in iTRAQ quantitation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 1885-1897.
9. Ow, S. Y., Salim, M., Noirel, J., Evans, C. et al., iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: the good, the bad and the ugly. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 5347-5355.
10. Savitski, M. M., Fischer, F., Mathieson, T., Sweetman, G. et al., Targeted data acquisition for improved reproducibility and robustness of proteomic mass spectrometry assays. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 21, 1668-1679.
11. DeSouza, L. V., Taylor, A. M., Li, W., Minkoff, M. S. et al., Multiple reaction monitoring of mTRAQ-labeled peptides enables absolute quantification of endogenous levels of a potential cancer marker in cancerous and normal endometrial tissues. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3525-3534.
12. Ow, S. Y., Noirel, J., Salim, M., Evans, C. et al., Balancing robust quantification and identification for iTRAQ: application of UHR-ToF MS. Proteomics 2010, 10, 2205-2213.
13. Delmotte, N., Lasaosa, M., Tholey, A., Heinzle, E., Huber, C. G., Two-dimensional reversed-phase x ion-pair reversed-phase HPLC: an alternative approach to high-resolution peptide separation for shotgun proteome analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 4363-4373.
14. Dowell, J. A., Frost, D. C., Zhang, J., Li, L., Comparison of two-dimensional fractionation techniques for shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 6715-6723.
15. Phillips, H. L., Williamson, J. C., van Elburg, K. A., Snijders, A. P. et al., Shotgun proteome analysis utilising mixed mode (reversed phase-anion exchange chromatography) in conjunction with reversed phase liquid chromatography mass spectrometry analysis. Proteomics 2010, 10, 2950-2960.
16. Pappin, D., Emery, P., 58th Annual American Society for Mass Spectrometry Meeting, Matrix Science, Salt Lake City 2010.
17. McNulty, D. E., Annan, R. S., Hydrophilic interaction chromatography reduces the complexity of the phosphoproteome and improves global phosphopeptide isolation and detection. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 971-980.
18. Albuquerque, C. P., Smolka, M. B., Payne, S. H., Bafna, V. et al., A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 1389-1396.
19. Gan, C. S., Reardon, K. F., Wright, P. C., Comparison of protein and peptide prefractionation methods for the shotgun proteomic analysis of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Proteomics 2005, 5, 2468-2478.
20. Swartz, M. E., UPLC™: an introduction and review. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2005, 28, 1253-1263.
21. Wenger, C. D., Phanstiel, D., Coon, J. J., 58th Annual American Society for Mass Spectrometry Meeting, American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Salt Lake City 2010.
22. Perkel, J. M., iTRAQ gets put to the test. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 4885.