Comparative metabolic profiling revealed limitations in xylose-fermenting yeast during co-fermentation of glucose and xylose in the presence of inhibitors

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 152-164

  Wang, Xin ^a   Jin, Mingjie ^b   Balan, Venkatesh ^b   Jones, A Daniel ^c,d   Li, Xia ^a   Li, Bing Zhi ^a   Dale, Bruce E ^b   Yuan, Ying Jin ^a  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Michigan State University   (United States)

^c Michigan State University   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellulosic ethanoln; Inhibitors; Metabolomics; Xylose fermentation

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSIC ETHANOLN; GLUCOSE FERMENTATION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC ETHANOLS; METABOLOMIC ANALYSIS; METABOLOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE 424A; XYLOSE FERMENTATION; XYLOSE-FERMENTING YEASTS;

AMINO ACIDS; CORROSION INHIBITORS; ETHANOL; GLUCOSE; METABOLISM; SUGAR SUBSTITUTES; YEAST;

FERMENTATION;

4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID; ACETIC ACID; ALCOHOL; BUFFER; CADAVERINE; FURFURAL; GALACTINOL; GALACTOSE; GLUCOSE; GLUTAMIC ACID; GLYCEROL; GLYCINE; ISOLEUCINE; LYSINE; MANNITOL; PHENOL; TREHALOSE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XYLITOL; XYLOSE; AMINO ACID;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME METABOLISM; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS CULTURE; FUNGUS GROWTH; GLUCOSE UTILIZATION; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLOMICS; MICROORGANISM; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION REDUCTION STATE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST; YEAST CELL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DRUG EFFECTS; METABOLISM; METABOLOME; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ACETIC ACID; AMINO ACIDS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FURALDEHYDE; GLUCOSE; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; METABOLOME; METABOLOMICS; PHENOL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; XYLOSE;

EID: 84888032956     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24992     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allen SA, Clark W, McCaffery JM, Cai Z, Lanctot A, Slininger PJ, Liu ZL, Gorsich SW. 2010. Furfural induces reactive oxygen species accumulation and cellular damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:2.
2. Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Liden G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. 2007. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82(4):340-349.
3. Almeida B, Ohlmeier S, Almeida AJ, Madeo F, Leao C, Rodrigues F, Ludovico P. 2009. Yeast protein expression profile during acetic acid-induced apoptosis indicates causal involvement of the TOR pathway. Proteomics 9(3):720-732.
4. Bellissimi E, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. 2009. Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Fems Yeast Res 9(3):358-364.
5. Bera AK, Ho NWY, Khan A, Sedlak M. 2011. A genetic overhaul of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST) to improve xylose fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38(5):617-626.
6. Bergdahl B, Heer D, Sauer U, Hahn-Hagerdal B, van Niel EWJ. 2012. Dynamic metabolomics differentiates between carbon and energy starvation in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermenting xylose. Biotechnol Biofuels 5(1):34.
7. Brauer MJ, Yuan J, Bennett BD, Lu W, Kimball E, Botstein D, Rabinowitz JD. 2006. Conservation of the metabolomic response to starvation across two divergent microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(51):19302-19307.
8. Casey E, Mosier NS, Adamec J, Jannasch A, Ho N, Sedlak M. 2012. Systems biology approach to understanding the effect of acetic acid on the co-fermentation of glucose and xylose by S. cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST). 34th Society for Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology Symposium.
9. Chaturvedi V, Bartiss A, Wong B. 1997. Expression of bacterial mtlD in Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in mannitol synthesis and protects a glycerol-defective mutant from high-salt and oxidative stress. J Bacteriol 179(1):157-162.
10. Chundawat SPS, Vismeh R, Sharma LN, Humpula JF, Sousa LDC, Chambliss CK, Jones AD, Balan V, Dale BE. 2010. Multifaceted characterization of cell wall decomposition products formed during ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) and dilute acid based pretreatments. Bioresour Technol 101(21):8429-8438.
11. Coleman ST, Fang TK, Rovinsky SA, Turano FJ, Moye-Rowley WS. 2001. Expression of a glutamate decarboxylase homologue is required for normal oxidative stress tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 276(1):244-250.
12. Ding MZ, Wang X, Yang Y, Yuan YJ. 2012. Comparative metabolic profiling of parental and inhibitors-tolerant yeasts during lignocellulosic ethanol fermentation. Metabolomics 8(2):232-243.
13. Eisler H, Frohlich KU, Heidenreich E. 2004. Starvation for an essential amino acid induces apoptosis and oxidative stress in yeast. Exp Cell Res 300(2):345-353.
14. Fiehn O. 2002. Metabolomics-The link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol Biol 48(1-2):155-171.
15. Gonzalez R, Tao H, Shanmugam KT, York SW, Ingram LO. 2002. Global gene expression differences associated with changes in glycolytic flux and growth rate in Escherichia coli during the fermentation of glucose and xylose. Biotechnol Progr 18(1):6-20.
16. Grotkjaer T, Christakopoulos P, Nielsen J, Olsson L. 2005. Comparative metabolic network analysis of two xylose fermenting recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Metab Eng 7(5-6):437-444.
17. Hasunuma T, Sanda T, Yamada R, Yoshimura K, Ishii J, Kondo A. 2011. Metabolic pathway engineering based on metabolomics confers acetic and formic acid tolerance to a recombinant xylose-fermenting strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Factories 10(1):2.
18. Heer D, Heine D, Sauer U. 2009. Resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high concentrations of furfural is based on NADPH-dependent reduction by at least two oxireductases. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(24):7631-7638.
19. Heipieper HJ, Weber FJ, Sikkema J, Keweloh H, de Bont JAM. 1994. Mechanisms of resistance of whole cells to toxic organic solvents. Trends Biotechnol 12:409-415.
20. Helle S, Cameron D, Lam J, White B, Duff S. 2003. Effect of inhibitory compounds found in biomass hydrolysates on growth and xylose fermentation by a genetically engineered strain of S. cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb Technol 33(6):786-792.
21. Herdeiro RS, Pereira MD, Panek AD, Eleutherio ECA. 2006. Trehalose protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae from lipid peroxidation. during oxidative stress. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1760(3):340-346.
22. Ho NWY, Chen ZD, Brainard AP. 1998. Genetically engineered Sacccharomyces yeast capable of effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(5):1852-1859.
23. Horvath IS, Franzen CJ, Taherzadeh MJ, Niklasson C, Liden G. 2003. Effects of furfural on the respiratory metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in glucose-limited chemostats. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(7):4076-4086.
24. Hu L, Lu H, Liu QL, Chen XM, Jiang XN. 2005. Overexpression of mtlD gene in transgenic Populus tomentosa improves salt tolerance through accumulation of mannitol. Tree Physiol 25(10):1273-1281.
25. Jin M, Lau MW, Balan V, Dale BE. 2010. Two-step SSCF to convert AFEX-treated switchgrass to ethanol using commercial enzymes and Saccharomyces cerevisiae 424A (LNH-ST). Bioresour Technol 101(21):8171-8178.
26. Jin M, Balan V, Gunawan C, Dale BE. 2012. Quantitatively understanding reduced xylose fermentation performance in AFEX (TM) treated corn stover hydrolysate using Saccharomyces cerevisiae 424A (LNH-ST) and Escherichia coli KO11. Bioresour Technol 111:294-300.
27. Karhumaa K, Fromanger R, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. 2007. High activity of xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase improves xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73(5):1039-1046.
28. Kim JS, Choi SH, Lee JK. 2006. Lysine decarboxylase expression by Vibrio vulnificus is induced by SoxR in response to superoxide stress. J Bacteriol 188(24):8586-8592.
29. Landolfo S, Politi H, Angeozzi D, Mannazzu I. 2008. ROS accumulation and oxidative damage to cell structures in Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains during fermentation of high-sugar-containing medium. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1780(6):892-898.
30. Li BZ, Yuan YJ. 2010. Transcriptome shifts in response to furfural and acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86(6):1915-1924.
31. Li BZ, Balan V, Yuan YJ, Dale BE. 2010. Process optimization to convert forage and sweet sorghum bagasse to ethanol based on ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 101(4):1285-1292.
32. Lin FM, Qiao B, Yuan YJ. 2009. Comparative proteomic analysis of tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae to furfural, a lignocellulosic inhibitory compound. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(11):3765-3776.
33. Liu ZL. 2006. Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73(1):27-36.
34. Lu S, Wang J, Niu Y, Yang J, Zhou J, Yuan Y. 2012. Metabolic profiling reveals growth related FAME productivity and quality of Chlorella sorokiniana with different inoculum sizes. Biotechnol Bioeng 109(7):1651-1662.
35. Ludovico P, Sousa MJ, Silva MT, Leao C, Corte-Real M. 2001. Saccharomyces cerevisiae commits to a programmed cell death process in response to acetic acid. Microbiology 147:2409-2415.
36. Matsushika A, Inoue H, Kodaki T, Sawayama S. 2009. Ethanol production from xylose in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: Current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84(1):37-53.
37. Mira NP, Palma M, Guerreiro JF, Sa-Correia I. 2010. Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for tolerance to acetic acid. Microbial Cell Factories 9:79.
38. Olsson L, Hahn-Hagerdal B. 1993. Fermentative performance of bacteria and yeasts in lignocellulose hydrolysates. Process Biochem 28(4):249-257.
39. Pampulha ME, Loureiro-Dias MC. 1990. Activity of glycolytic enzymes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 34(3):375-380.
40. Qin L, Liu ZH, Li BZ, Dale BE, Yuan YJ. 2012. Mass balance and transformation of corn stover by pretreatment with different dilute organic acids. Bioresour Technol 112:319-326.
41. Ramadan Z, Jacobs D, Grigorov M, Kochhar S. 2006. Metabolic profiling using principal component analysis, discriminant partial least squares, and genetic algorithms. Talanta 68(5):1683-1691.
42. Rhee HJ, Kim EJ, Lee JK. 2007. Physiological polyamines: Simple primordial stress molecules. J Cell Mol Med 11(4):685-703.
43. Slininger PJ, Dien BS, Gorsich SW, Liu ZL. 2006. Nitrogen source and mineral optimization enhance d-xylose conversion to ethanol by the yeast Pichia stipitis NRRL Y-7124. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72(6):1285-1296.
44. Slininger PJ, Gorsich SW, Liu ZL. 2009. Culture nutrition and physiology impact the inhibitor tolerance of the yeast Pichia stipitis NRRL Y-7124. Biotechnol Bioeng 102(3):778-790.
45. Sokolov S, Knorre D, Smirnova E, Markova O, Pozniakovsky A, Skulachev V, Severin F. 2006. Ysp2 mediates death of yeast induced by amiodarone or intracellular acidification. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1757(9-10):1366-1370.
46. van Maris AJA, Abbott DA, Bellissimi E, van den Brink J, Kuyper M, Luttik MAH, Wisselink HW, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. 2006. Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Current status. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek Int J Gen Mol Microbiol 90(4):391-418.
47. Wahlbom CF, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 2002. Furfural, 5-hydroxymethyl furfural, and acetoin act as external electron acceptors during anaerobic fermentation of xylose in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 78(2):172-178.
48. Wang X, Li BZ, Ding MZ, Zhang WW, Yuan YJ. 2013. Metabolomic analysis reveals key metabolites related to the rapid adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to multiple Inhibitors of furfural, acetic acid, and phenol. Omics 17(3):150-159.
49. Xia JM, Yuan YJ. 2009. Comparative lipidomics of four strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals different responses to furfural, phenol, and acetic acid. J Agric Food Chem 57(1):99-108.
50. Xia JM, Jones AD, Lau MW, Yuan YJ, Dale BE, Balan V. 2011. Comparative lipidomic profiling of xylose-metabolizing S. cerevisiae and its parental strain in different media reveals correlations between membrane lipids and fermentation capacity. Biotechnol Bioeng 108(1):12-21.
51. Yang J, Ding MZ, Li BZ, Liu ZL, Wang X, Yuan YJ. 2012. Integrated phospholipidomics and transcriptomics analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with enhanced tolerance to a mixture of acetic acid, furfural, and phenol. Omics 16(7-8):374-386.