State-of-the-art technology in modern computer-aided drug design

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 745-752

  Dalkas, Georgios A ^a   Vlachakis, Dimitrios ^a   Tsagkrasoulis, Dimosthenis ^a   Kastania, Anastasia ^a   Kossida, Sophia ^a  

^a BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (Greece)

Author keywords

3D printing; 3D virtual environments; Computer aided drug design; Flexible docking; Haptics

Indexed keywords

3D PRINTING; 3D VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER-AIDED DRUG DESIGN; DRUG DESIGN; FLEXIBLE DOCKING; HAPTICS;

3D PRINTING; 3D VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS; COMPUTER-AIDED DRUG DESIGN; FLEXIBLE DOCKING; HAPTICS;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DRUG DESIGN;

EID: 84887712032     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbs063     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Kapetanovic IM. Computer-aided drug discovery and development (CADDD): in silico-chemico-biological approach. Chem Biol Interact 2008;171:165-76.
2. Xiang M, Cao Y, Fan W, et al. Computer-aided drug design: lead discovery and optimization. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2012;15(4):328-37.
3. Meyer EF, Swanson SM, Williams JA. Molecular modelling and drug design. PharmacolTher 2000;85:113-21.
4. Zonta N, Grimstead IJ, Avis NJ, et al. Accessible haptic technology for drug design applications. JMolModel 2009; 15:193-6.
5. Hayward VAO, Cruz-Hernandez M, Grant D, et al. Haptic interfaces and devices. Sensor Rev 2004;24(1):16-29.
6. Lai-Yuen S, Lee Y. Interactive computer-aided design for molecular docking and assembly. Comput-Aided Des App 2006;3(6):701-9.
7. Liere R, Adriaansen T, Zudilova-Seinstra E. Trends in Interactive Visualization State-of-the-Art Survey. New York: Springer, 2009.
8. Brooks FP, Ouh-Young M, Batter JJ, et al. Project GROPE: Haptic displays for scientific visualization. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Dallas, TX, 1990. New York: SIGGRAPH'90 ACM Press; pp. 177-85.
9. Nagata H, Mizushima H, Tanaka H. Concept and prototype of protein-ligand docking simulator with force feedback technology. Bioinformatics 2002;18:140-6.
10. Bayazit OB, Song G, Amato NM. Ligand binding with OBPRM and haptic user input. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'01), 2001. College Station, TX, USA: Texas A & M University; pp. 954-9.
11. Lai-Yuen S, Lee Y. Haptic-based automatic molecular docking and assembly search system for computer-aided molecular design (CAMD). In: Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, Alexandria,VA, 2006. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
12. Bidmon K, Reina G, Bos F, et al. Time-based haptic analysis of protein dynamics. In: Proceedings of the Second Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment andTeleoperator Systems. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2007;537-42.
13. Wollacott AM, Merz KJ. Haptic applications for molecular structure manipulation. JMol Graph Model 2007;25: 801-5.
14. Stocks MB, Hayward S, Laycock SD. Interacting with the biomolecular solvent accessible surface via a haptic feedback device. BMCStruct Biol 2009;9:69.
15. Subasi E, Basdogan C. A New Haptic Interaction and Visualization Approach for Rigid Molecular Docking in Virtual Environments Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Vol. 17(No.1). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2008, 73-90.
16. Heyd J, Birmanns S. Global interactive docking and hessian filtering for multi-resolution fitting of biomolecular assemblies. MicroscMicroanal 2008;14:130-1.
17. Stone JE, Gullingsrud J, Schulten K. A system for interactive molecular dynamics simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics 2001; 191-4.
18. Sourina O, Torres J, Wang J. Visual haptic-based biomolecular docking. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Cyberworlds 2008;240-247.
19. Sourina O, Torres J, Wang J. Visual haptic-based biomolecular docking and its applications in E-learning. In: Pan Z, Cheok AD, Muller W, El Rhalibi A (eds). Transactions on Edutainment II LNCS, Vol. 5660. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009, 105-18.
20. Hou X, Sourina O. Haptic rendering algorithm for biomolecular docking with torque force. In: 2010 International Conference on Cyberworlds 2010;25-31.
21. Hou X, Sourina O. Six degree-of-freedom haptic rendering for biomolecular docking. In: Gavrilova ML, et al, (ed). Trans on Comput Sci XII, LNCS 6670. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin, 2011;98-117.
22. Daunay B, Micaelli A, Regnier S. Energy-field reconstruction for haptic-based molecular docking using energy minimization processes. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2007;2704-9.
23. Ferey N., Nelson J., Martin C., et al. Multisensory vs interaction for protein-docking in the corsaire project. Virtual Reality 2009;13:273-93.
24. Hou X, Sourina O. Six degree-of-freedom haptic rendering for biomolecular docking. In: Gavrilova ML, et al, (ed). Trans on Comput Sci XII, LNCS 6670. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin, 2011;98-117.
25. Fairén M, Brunet P, Techmann T. MiniVR: a portable virtual reality system. Comput Graph 2004;28:289-96.
26. Virtual Reality. http://www.virtualconferencesite.com/ virtual-reality.
27. Schulze JP, Kim HS, Weber P, et al. Chapter 6 - advanced applications of virtual reality. In: Marvin VZ, (ed). Advances in Computers, Vol. 82. San Diego, CA: Elsevier, 2011, 217-60.
28. DeFanti TA, Dawe G, Sandin DJ, et al. The StarCAVE, a third-generation CAVE and virtual reality OptIPortal. Future GenerationComput Syst 2009;25:169-78.
29. DeFanti T, Acevedo D, Ainsworth R, et al. The future of the CAVE. Cent EurJ Eng 2011;1:16-37.
30. Gillet A, Sanner M, Stoffler D, et al. Tangible interfaces for structural molecular biology. Structure 2005;13:483-91.
31. Symes MD, Kitson PJ, Yan J, et al. Integrated 3D-printed reactionware for chemical synthesis and analysis. Nat Chem 2012;4:349-54.
32. 3D Printed Models and Augmented Reality for Chemists. mgl.scripps.edu/news_archives/3d-printed-models-andaugmented- reality-for-chemists.
33. Durrant JD, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery. BMC Biol 2011;9:71.
34. Teague SJ. Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery. Nat RevDrug Discov 2003;2:527-41.
35. Totrov M, Abagyan R. Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008;18:178-84.
36. Cozzini P, Kellogg GE, Spyrakis F, et al. Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design. JMedChem 2008;51:6237-55.
37. Alonso H, Bliznyuk AA, Gready JE. Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design. MedRes Rev 2006;26:531-68.
38. B-Rao C, Subramanian J, Sharma SD. Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. Drug DiscovToday 2009;14:394-400.
39. Amaro R, Baron R, McCammon J. An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computeraided drug design. J Comput Aided Mol Design 2008;22: 693-705.
40. Machado KS, Schroeder EK, Ruiz DD, et al. FReDoWS: a method to automate molecular docking simulations with explicit receptor flexibility and snapshots selection. BMC Genomics 2011;12(Suppl 4):S6.
41. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. JAmChemSoc 2003;125:1731-7.
42. Guilbert C, James TL. Docking to rna via root-meansquare- deviation-driven energy minimization with flexible ligands and flexible targets. J Chem Inform Model 2008;48: 1257-68.