Sensorial suppression of self-generated sounds and its dependence on attention

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 300-310

  Saupe, Katja ^a   Widmann, Andreas ^a   Trujillo Barreto, Nelson J ^b   Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b CUBAN NEUROSCIENCE CENTER   (Cuba)

Author keywords

Attention; Auditory steady state response; Event related potentials; Self generated sounds

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTRODE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SOUND; SPACE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; TOMOGRAPHY; TOPOGRAPHY;

ATTENTION; AUDITORY STEADY-STATE RESPONSE; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; SELF-GENERATED SOUNDS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME; REPRESSION, PSYCHOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887627821     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Adler G., Adler J. Influence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80 to 200-millisecond latency range. Audiology 1989, 28:316-325.
2. Alho K., Teder W., Lavikainen J., Näätänen R. Strongly focused attention and auditory event-related potentials. Biol. Psychol. 1994, 38:73-90.
3. Alho K., Woods D.L., Algazi A. Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 1994, 31:469-479.
4. Aliu S.O., Houde J.F., Nagarajan S.S. Motor-induced suppression of the auditory cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21:791-802.
5. Anllo-Vento L. Shifting attention in visual space - the effects of peripheral cueing on brain cortical potentials. Int. J. Neurosci. 1995, 80:353-370.
6. Arthur D.L., Lewis P.S., Medvick P.A., Flynn E.R. A neuromagnetic study of selective auditory attention. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1991, 78:348-360.
7. Baess P., Widmann A., Roye A., Schröger E., Jacobsen T. Attenuated human auditory middle latency response and evoked 40-Hz response to self-initiated sounds. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:1514-1521.
8. Baess P., Horváth J., Jacobsen T., Schröger E. Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: an ERP study. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1276-1283.
9. Bäß P., Jacobsen T., Schröger E. Electrophysiological measurements indicate operation of internal forward models of self-agency in the auditory modality. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2008, 43:137-143.
10. Bäß P., Jacobsen T., Schröger E. Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2008, 70:137-143.
11. Bays P.M., Wolpert D.M. Predictive Attenuation in the Perception of Touch 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
12. Bays P.M., Flanagan J.R., Wolpert D.M. Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:281-284.
13. Bidet-Caulet A., Fischer C., Besle J., Aguera P.E., Giard M.H., Bertrand O. Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:9252-9261.
14. Blakemore S.J., Rees G., Frith C.D. How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:521-529.
15. Blakemore S.J., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1999, 11:551-559.
16. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D., Frith C. Why can't you tickle yourself?. Neuroreport 2000, 11:R11-R16.
17. Bosch-Bayard J., Valdes-Sosa P., Virues-Alba T., Aubert-Vazquez E., John E.R., Harmony T., Riera-Diaz J., Trujillo-Barreto N. 3D statistical parametric mapping of EEG source spectra by means of Variable Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (VARETA). Clin. Electroencephalogr. 2001, 32:47-61.
18. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:433-436.
19. Cardoso-Leite P., Mamassian P., Schütz-Bosbach S., Waszak F. A new look at sensory attenuation: action-effect anticipation affects sensitivity, not response bias. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21:1740-1745.
20. Christoffels I.K., van de Ven V., Waldorp L.J., Formisano E., Schiller N.O. The sensory consequences of speaking: parametric neural cancellation during speech in auditory cortex. Plos One 2011, 6.
21. Crapse T.B., Sommer M.A. Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:587-600.
22. Crapse T.B., Sommer M.A. Corollary discharge circuits in the primate brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2008, 18:552-557.
23. Creutzfeldt O., Ojemann G., Lettich E. Neuronal activity in the human lateral temporal-lobe. II. Responses to the subjects own voice. Exp. Brain Res. 1989, 77:476-489.
24. Crowley K.E., Colrain I.M. A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:732-744.
25. Curio G., Neuloh G., Numminen J., Jousmäki V., Hari R. Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2000, 9:183-191.
26. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
27. Desantis A., Weiss C., Schutz-Bosbach S., Waszak F. Believing and perceiving: authorship belief modulates sensory attenuation. PloS one 2012, 7:e37959.
28. Evans A.C., Collins D.L., Mills S.R., Brown E.D., Kelly R.L., Peters T.M. 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, IEEE Conference Record, San Francisco, CA, USA 1993, 1813-1817.
29. Ford J.M., Mathalon D.H. Electrophysiological evidence of corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia during talking and thinking. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2004, 38:37-46.
30. Ford J.M., Gray M., Faustman W.O., Roach B.J., Mathalon D.H. Dissecting corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:522-529.
31. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:293-301.
32. Frith C.D., Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M. Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Res. Rev. 2000, 31:357-363.
33. García-Larrea L., Lukaszewicz A.C., Mauguiére F. Revisiting the oddball paradigm. Non-target vs neutral stimuli and the evaluation of ERP attentional effects. Neuropsychologia 1992, 30:723-741.
34. Goldberg G. Supplementary motor area structure and function - review and hypotheses. Behav. Brain Sci. 1985, 8:567-588.
35. Gutschalk A., Mase R., Roth R., Ille N., Rupp A., Hahnel S., Picton T.W., Scherg M. Deconvolution of 40Hz steady-state fields reveals two overlapping source activities of the human auditory cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 110:856-868.
36. Hansen J.C., Hillyard S.A. Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1980, 49:277-290.
37. Hansen J.C., Hillyard S.A. Effects of stimulation rate and attribute cuing on event-related potentials during selective auditory attention. Psychophysiology 1984, 21:394-405.
38. Heinks-Maldonado T.H., Mathalon D.H., Gray M., Ford J.M. Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:180-190.
39. Herdman A.T., Lins O., Van Roon P., Stapells D.R., Scherg M., Picton T.W. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr. 2002, 15:69-86.
40. Hillyard S.A., Hink R.F., Schwent V.L., Picton T.W. Electrical signs of selective attention in human brain. Science 1973, 182:177-180.
41. Horváth J. Action-sound coincidence-related attenuation of auditory ERPs is not modulated by affordance compatibility. Biol. Psychol. 2013, 93:81-87.
42. Horváth J., Burgyán A. No evidence for peripheral mechanism attenuating auditory ERPs to self-induced tones. Psychophysiology 2013, 50:563-569.
43. Horváth J., Maess B., Baess P., Tóth A. Action-sound coincidences suppress evoked responses of the human auditory cortex in EEG and MEG. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24(9):1919-1931.
44. Hotelling H. The generalization of Student's ratio. Ann. Math. Stat. 1931, 2:360-378.
45. Houde J.F., Nagarajan S.S., Sekihara K., Merzenich M.M. Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: an MEG study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2002, 14:1125-1138.
46. Jemel B., Oades R.D., Oknina L., Achenbach C., Röpcke B. Frontal and temporal lobe sources for a marker of controlled auditory attention: the negative difference (Nd) event-related potential. Brain Topogr. 2003, 15:249-262.
47. Kaernbach C. A single-interval adjustment-matrix (SIAM) procedure for unbiased adaptive testing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1990, 88:2645-2655.
48. Keitel C., Schröger E., Saupe K., Müller M.M. Sustained selective intermodal attention modulates processing of language-like stimuli. Exp. Brain Res. 2011, 213:321-327.
49. Kiebel S.J., Tallon-Baudry C., Friston K.J. Parametric analysis of oscillatory activity as measured with EEG/MEG. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2005, 26:170-177.
50. Knight R.T., Hillyard S.A., Woods D.L., Neville H.J. The effects of frontal-cortex lesions on event-related potentials during auditory selective attention. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1981, 52:571-582.
51. Knolle F., Schröger E., Baess P., Kotz S.A. The cerebellum generates motor-to-auditory predictions: ERP lesion evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24:698-706.
52. Knolle F., Schröger E., Kotz S.A. Prediction errors in self- and externally-generated deviants. Biol. Psychol. 2013, 92:410-416.
53. Kok P., Rahnev D., Jehee J.F., Lau H.C., de Lange F.P. Attention reverses the effect of prediction in silencing sensory signals. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 22:2197-2206.
54. Kotz S.A., Schwartze M. Cortical speech processing unplugged: a timely subcortico-cortical framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:392-399.
55. Kudo N., Nakagome K., Kasai K., Araki T., Fukuda M., Kato N., Iwanami A. Effects of corollary discharge on event-related potentials during selective attention task in healthy men and women. Neurosci. Res. 2004, 48:59-64.
56. Lally N., Frendo B., Diedrichsen J. Sensory cancellation of self-movement facilitates visual motion detection. J. Vis. 2011, 11(14):1-8.
57. Lange K. The reduced N1 to self-generated tones: an effect of temporal predictability?. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1088-1095.
58. Makeig S., Müller M.M., Rockstroh B. Effects of voluntary movements on early auditory brain responses. Exp. Brain Res. 1996, 110:487-492.
59. Martikainen M.H., Kaneko K., Hari R. Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:299-302.
60. Moberget T., Karns C.M., Deouell L.Y., Lindgren M., Knight R.T., Ivry R.B. Detecting violations of sensory expectancies following cerebellar degeneration: a mismatch negativity study. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2569-2579.
61. Müller N., Schlee W., Hartmann T., Lorenz I., Weisz N. Top-down modulation of the auditory steady-state response in a task-switch paradigm. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2009, 3:1-9.
62. Näätänen R. Processing negativity - an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol. Bull. 1982, 92:605-640.
63. Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information-processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav. Brain Sci. 1990, 13:201-232.
64. Näätänen R. Attention and Brain Function 1992, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
65. Näätänen R., Picton T.W. N2 and automatic versus controlled processes. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 1986, 38:169-186.
66. Novak G., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G. Mismatch detection and the latency of temporal judgments. Psychophysiology 1992, 29:398-411.
67. Numminen J., Curio G. Differential effects of overt, covert and replayed speech on vowel-evoked responses of the human auditory cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 1999, 272:29-32.
68. Nuwer M.R., Comi G., Emerson R., Fuglsang-Frederiksen A., Guerit J.M., Hinrichs H., Ikeda A., Luccas F.J.C., Rappelsburger P. IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 106:259-261.
69. Oades R.D., Zerbin D., Dittmannbalcar A. The topography of event-related potentials in passive and active conditions of a 3-tone auditory oddball test. Int. J. Neurosci. 1995, 81:249-264.
70. Oades R.D., Dittmann-Balcar A., Zerbin D. Development and topography of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs): mismatch and processing negativity in individuals 8-22years of age. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:677-693.
71. Oppenheim A.V., Schafer R.W. Digital Signal Processing 1975, Prentice Hall Inc., London.
72. Pantev C., Roberts L.E., Elbert T., Ross B., Wienbruch C. Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear. Res. 1996, 101:62-74.
73. Passingham R.E. Two cortical systems for directing movement. Ciba Found. Symp. 1987, 132:151-164.
74. Passingham R.E., Bengtsson S.L., Lau H.C. Medial frontal cortex: from self-generated action to reflection on one's own performance. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:16-21.
75. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:437-442.
76. Perrin F., Pernier J., Bertrand O., Echallier J.F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current-density mapping. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1989, 72:184-187.
77. Perrin F., Pernier J., Bertrand O., Echallier J.F. Corrigendum. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1990, 76:565.
78. Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Kwong B., Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111:220-236.
79. Potts G.F., Dien J., Hartry-Speiser A.L., McDougal L.M., Tucker D.M. Dense sensor array topography of the event-related potential to task-relevant auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 106:444-456.
80. Rochat P., Hespos S.J. Differential rooting response by neonates: evidence for an early sense of self. Early Dev. Parent 1997, 6:105-112.
81. Ross B., Pantev C. Auditory steady-state responses reveal amplitude modulation gap detection thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 115:2193-2206.
82. Ross B., Picton T.W., Herdman A.T., Pantev C. The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response. Neurol. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 2004:22.
83. Roth W.T., Ford J.M., Lewis S.J., Kopell B.S. Effects of stimulus probability and task-relevance on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 1976, 13:311-317.
84. SanMiguel I., Todd J., Schroger E. Sensory suppression effects to self-initiated sounds reflect the attenuation of the unspecific N1 component of the auditory ERP. Psychophysiology 2013, 50:334-343.
85. Sato A. Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequence of others' actions. Conscious. Cogn. 2008, 17:1219-1227.
86. Saupe K., Schröger E., Andersen S.K., Müller M.M. Neural mechanisms of intermodal sustained selective attention with concurrently presented auditory and visual stimuli. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2009, 3.
87. Saupe K., Widmann A., Bendixen A., Müller M.M., Schröger E. Effects of intermodal attention on the auditory steady-state response and the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:321-327.
88. Schäfer E.W.P., Marcus M.M. Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. Science 1973, 181:175-177.
89. Schlögl A., Keinrath C., Zimmermann D., Scherer R., Leeb R., Pfurtscheller G. A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:98-104.
90. Skosnik P.D., Krishnan G.P., O'Donnell B.F. The effect of selective attention on the gamma-band auditory steady-state response. Neurosci. Lett. 2007, 420:223-228.
91. Sperry R.W. Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1950, 43:482-489.
92. Talsma D., Kok A. Nonspatial intermodal selective attention is mediated by sensory brain areas: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:736-751.
93. Talsma D., Kok A. Intermodal spatial attention differs between vision and audition: an event-related potential analysis. Psychophysiology 2002, 39:689-706.
94. Teder W., Alho K., Reinikainen K., Näätänen R. Interstimulus-interval and the selective-attention effect on auditory ERPs - N1 enhancement versus processing negativity. Psychophysiology 1993, 30:71-81.
95. Timm J., SanMiguel I., Saupe K., Schroeger E. The N1-suppression effect for self-initiated sounds is independent of attention. BMC Neurosci. 2013, 14.
96. Tonnquist-Uhlen I., Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Kwong B., Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: the T-complex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003, 114:685-701.
97. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. Awareness of somatic events associated with a voluntary action. Exp. Brain Res. 2003, 149:439-446.
98. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. Experimenting with the acting self. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 2005, 22:387-407.
99. Vaughan H.G., Ritter W., Simson R. Topographic analysis of auditory event-related potentials. Prog. Brain Res. 1980, 54:279-285.
100. von Holst E. Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. Br. J. Anim. Behav. 1954, 2:89-94.
101. von Holst E., Mittelstaedt E. Das Reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften 1950, 37:464-476.
102. Weiskrantz L., Elliott J., Darlingt C. Preliminary observations on tickling oneself. Nature 1971, 230:598-599.
103. Weiss C., Herwig A., Schütz-Bosbach S. The self in action effects: selective attenuation of self-generated sounds. Cognition 2011, 121:207-218.
104. Weiss C., Herwig A., Schütz-Bosbach S. The self in social interactions: sensory attenuation of auditory action effects is stronger in interactions with others. Plos One 2011, 6.
105. Woldorff M.G., Hillyard S.A. Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1991, 79:170-191.
106. Wolpert D.M. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1997, 1:209-216.
107. Wolpert D.M., Flanagan J.R. Motor prediction. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:R729-R732.
108. Wolpert D.M., Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 1998, 11:1317-1329.
109. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995, 269:1880-1882.
110. Wolpert D.M., Miall R.C., Kawato M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1998, 2:338-347.
111. Woods D.L., Knight R.T. Electrophysiologic evidence of increased distractibility after dorsolateral prefrontal lesions. Neurology 1986, 36:212-216.
112. Worsley K.J., Marrett S., Neelin P., Evans A.C. Searching scale space for activation in PET images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1996, 4:74-90.