The self in action effects: Selective attenuation of self-generated sounds

Cognition

Volumn 121, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 207-218

  Weiss, Carmen ^a   Herwig, Arvid ^b   Schütz Bosbach, Simone ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action execution; Action observation; Minimal self; Sense of agency; Sensory attenuation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY CORTEX; SOUND INTENSITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AWARENESS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EGO; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960756779     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Aglioti S.M., Pazzaglia M. Representing actions through their sound. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 206(2):141-151.
2. Aliu S.O., Houde J.F., Nagarajan S.S. Motor-induced suppression of the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(4):791-802.
3. Bayne T., Pacherie E. Narrators and comparators: The architecture of agentive self-awareness. Synthese 2007, 159(3):475-491.
4. Bays P.M., Flanagan J.R., Wolpert D.M. Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive. PLoS Biology 2006, 4(2):e28.
5. Berberian B., Cleeremans A. Endogenous versus exogenous change: Change detection, self and agency. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19(1):198-214.
6. Blakemore S.J., Frith C. The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43(2):260-267.
7. Blakemore S.J., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11(5):551-559.
8. Blakemore S.J., Rees G., Frith C.D. How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36(6):521-529.
9. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1(7):635-640.
10. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D., Frith C. Why can't you tickle yourself?. NeuroReport 2000, 11(11):R11-R16.
11. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6(6):237-242.
12. Calvo-Merino B., Glaser D.E., Grezes J., Passingham R.E., Haggard P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: An FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(8):1243-1249.
13. Calvo-Merino B., Grezes J., Glaser D.E., Passingham R.E., Haggard P. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology 2006, 16(19):1905-1910.
14. Cardoso-Leite P., Mamassian P., Schütz-Bosbach S., Waszak F. A new look at sensory attenuation: Action-effect anticipation affects sensitivity, not response bias. Psychological Science 2010, 21(12):1740-1745.
15. Catmur C., Gillmeister H., Bird G., Liepelt R., Brass M., Heyes C. Through the looking glass: Counter-mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor learning. European Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(6):1208-1215.
16. Cross E.S., Hamilton A.F., Grafton S.T. Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers. NeuroImage 2006, 31(3):1257-1267.
17. David N., Newen A., Vogeley K. The "sense of agency" and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17(2):523-534.
18. de Vignemont F., Haggard P. Action observation and execution: What is shared?. Social Neuroscience 2008, 3(3-4):421-433.
19. di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research 1992, 91(1):176-180.
20. Elsner B., Aschersleben G. Do I get what you get? Learning about the effects of self-performed and observed actions in infancy. Consciousness and Cognition 2003, 12(4):732-751.
21. Elsner B., Hommel B. Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27(1):229-240.
22. Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., Haggard P. Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Cognition 2008, 107(2):693-704.
23. Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., Thomas R., Haggard P. Agency, subjective time, and other minds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(6):1261-1268.
24. Fogassi L., Ferrari P.F., Gesierich B., Rozzi S., Chersi F., Rizzolatti G. Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science 2005, 308(5722):662-667.
25. Ford J.M., Gray M., Faustman W.O., Roach B.J., Mathalon D.H. Dissecting corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology 2007, 44(4):522-529.
26. Frith C. The self in action: Lessons from delusions of control. Consciousness and Cognition 2005, 14(4):752-770.
27. Frith C.D., Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M. Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 2000, 355(1404):1771-1788.
28. Gallagher S. Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(1):14-21.
29. Gallagher S. The natural philosophy of agency. Philosophy Compass 2007, 2(2):347-357.
30. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 1996, 119(2):593-609.
31. Gentsch, A., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (in press). I did it: Unconscious expectation of sensory consequences modulates the experience of self-agency and its functional signature. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
32. Georgieff N., Jeannerod M. Beyond consciousness of external reality: A "who" system for consciousness of action and self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 1998, 7(3):465-477.
33. Greenhouse S.W., Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 1959, 24:95-112.
34. Haggard P., Whitford B. Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 19(1):52-58.
35. Hesse M.D., Nishitani N., Fink G.R., Jousmaki V., Hari R. Attenuation of somatosensory responses to self-produced tactile stimulation. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(2):425-432.
36. Heyes C. Where do mirror neurons come from?. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2010, 34(4):575-583.
37. Heyes C.M., Foster C.L. Motor learning by observation: Evidence from a serial reaction time task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2002, 55(2):593-607.
38. Jeannerod M. The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research 2003, 142(1-2):1-15.
39. Jeannerod M. Motor cognition: What actions tell the self 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
40. Jeannerod M., Pacherie E. Agency, simulation and self-identification. Mind and Language 2004, 19(2):113-146.
41. Knoblich G., Flach R. Action identity: Evidence from self-recognition, prediction, and coordination. Consciousness and Cognition 2003, 12(4):620-632.
42. Kohler E., Keysers C., Umilta M.A., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons. Science 2002, 297(5582):846-848.
43. Lahav A., Saltzman E., Schlaug G. Action representation of sound: Audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. The Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(2):308-314.
44. Lange K. Brain correlates of early auditory processing are attenuated by expectations for time and pitch. Brain and Cognition 2009, 69(1):127-137.
45. Lange K. The reduced N1 to self-generated tones: An effect of temporal predictability?. Psychophysiology 2011, 48(no). 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01174.x.
46. Legrand D. Naturalizing the acting self: Subjective vs. anonymous agency. Philosophical Psychology 2007, 20(4):457-478.
47. Marcel A. The sense of agency: Awareness and ownership of action. Agency and self-awareness 2003, 48-93. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Roessler, N. Eilan (Eds.).
48. Margulis E.H., Mlsna L.M., Uppunda A.K., Parrish T.B., Wong P.C. Selective neurophysiologic responses to music in instrumentalists with different listening biographies. Human Brain Mapping 2009, 30(1):267-275.
49. Martikainen M.H., Kaneko K., Hari R. Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(3):299-302.
50. Mattar A.A., Gribble P.L. Motor learning by observing. Neuron 2005, 46(1):153-160.
51. Mukamel R., Ekstrom A.D., Kaplan J., Iacoboni M., Fried I. Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology 2010, 20(8):750-756.
52. Pacherie E. The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition 2008, 107(1):179-217.
53. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research 1996, 3(2):131-141.
54. Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L., Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001, 2(9):661-670.
55. Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2010, 11(4):264-274.
56. Sato A. Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequence of others' actions. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17(4):1219-1227.
57. Schafer E.W.P., Amochaev A., Russell M.J. Knowledge of stimulus timing attenuates human evoked cortical potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1981, 52(1):9-17.
58. Schütz-Bosbach S., Prinz W. Perceptual resonance: Action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11(8):349-355.
59. Shergill S.S., Bays P.M., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Two eyes for an eye: The neuroscience of force escalation. Science 2003, 301(5630):187.
60. Shimada S., Qi Y., Hiraki K. Detection of visual feedback delay in active and passive self-body movements. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 201(2):359-364.
61. Sperry R.W. Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. Journal of comparative and physiological psychology 1950, 43(6):482-489.
62. Stefan K., Cohen L.G., Duque J., Mazzocchio R., Celnik P., Sawaki L., et al. Formation of a motor memory by action observation. The Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(41):9339-9346.
63. Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., Newen A. Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17(1):219-239.
64. Ticini, L. F., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Weiss, C., Casile, A., & Waszak, F. (submitted for publication). When sounds become actions: Higher-order representation of newly learnt action sounds in the human motor system.
65. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. Awareness of somatic events associated with a voluntary action. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 149(4):439-446.
66. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. Experimenting with the acting self. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22(3-4):387-407.
67. Tsakiris M., Haggard P., Franck N., Mainy N., Sirigu A. A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition. Cognition 2005, 96(3):215-231.
68. Vinter A., Perruchet P. Implicit motor learning through observational training in adults and children. Memory and Cognition 2002, 30(2):256-261.
69. von Holst E., Mittelstaedt H. Das Reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften 1950, 37:464-476.
70. Wegner D.M., Sparrow B., Winerman L. Vicarious agency: Experiencing control over the movements of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 86(6):838-848.
71. Wilson M., Knoblich G. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 131(3):460-473.
72. Wolpert D.M., Flanagan J.R. Motor prediction. Current Biology 2001, 11(18):R729-R732.
73. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(Suppl.):1212-1217.
74. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995, 269(5232):1880-1882.