Action-sound coincidence-related attenuation of auditory ERPs is not modulated by affordance compatibility

Biological Psychology

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 81-87

  Horváth, János ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Auditory processing; EEG; Event related potentials; Forward model; N1; P2; Self generated sounds; T complex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; AUDITORY PROCESSING; AUDITORY SYSTEM PARAMETERS; COINCIDENCE RELATED EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE ATTENUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE P2; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE TB; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE VERTEX N1; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KEY PRESS TONE COINCIDENCE; KEY PRESSING TASK; KEY RELEASE TASK; KEY RELEASE TONE COINCIDENCE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874680481     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: 18736246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aliu S.O., Houde J.F., Nagarajan S.S. Motor-induced suppression of the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:791-802. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21055.
2. Baess P., Jacobsen T., Schröger E. Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2008, 70:137-143. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.06.005.
3. Baess P., Horváth J., Jacobsen T., Schröger E. Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: an ERP study. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1276-1283. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01196.x.
4. Baess P., Widmann A., Roye A., Schröger E., Jacobsen T. Attenuated human auditory middle latency response and evoked 40-Hz response to self-initiated sounds. European Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:1514-1521. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06683.x.
5. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1:635-640. 10.1038/2870.
6. Cullen K.E. Sensory signals during active versus passive movement. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2004, 14:698-706. 10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.002.
7. Curio G., Neuloh G., Numminen J., Jousmäki V., Hari R. Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex. Human Brain Mapping 2000, 9:183-191. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(200004)9:4<183::AID-HBM1>3.0.CO;2-Z.
8. Davidson P.R., Wolpert D.M. Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review. Journal of Neural Engineering 2005, 2(3):S313-S319. 10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/S11.
9. Desantis A., Hughes G., Waszak F. Intentional binding is driven by the mere presence of an action and not by motor prediction. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(1):e29557. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029557.
10. Flinker A., Chang E.F., Kirsch H.E., Barbaro N.M., Crone N.E., Knight R.T. Single-Trial Speech Suppression of Auditory Cortex Activity in Humans. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(49):16643-16650. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1809-10.2010.
11. Ford J.M., Gray M., Faustman W.O., Roach B.J., Mathalon D.H. Dissecting corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:522-529. 10.1111/j. 1469-8986.2007.00533.x.
12. Ford J.M., Mathalon D.H. Electrophysiological evidence of corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia during talking and thinking. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2004, 38:37-46. 10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00095-5.
13. Ford J.M., Mathalon D.H., Kalba S., Whitfield S., Faustman W.O., Roth W.T. Cortical responsiveness during talking and listening in schizophrenia: an event-related brain potential study. Biological Psychiatry 2001, 50:540-549. 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01166-0.
14. Gibson J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception 1979, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
15. Hazemann P., Audin G., Lille F. Effect of voluntary self-paced movements upon auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1975, 39:247-254. 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90146-7.
16. Heinks-Maldonado T.H., Mathalon D.H., Gray M., Ford J.M. Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:180-190. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00272.x.
17. Heinks-Maldonado T.H., Nagarajan S.S., Houde J.F. Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production. Neuroreport 2006, 17:1375-1379. 10.1097/01.wnr.0000233102.43526.e9.
18. Horváth, J. (in press). Attenuation of auditory ERPs to action-sound coincidences is not explained by voluntary allocation of attention. Psychophysiology doi:10.1111/psyp.12009.
19. Horváth J., Maess B., Baess P., Tóth A. Action-sound coincidences suppress evoked responses of the human auditory cortex in EEG and MEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012, 24(9):1919-1932. 10.1162/jocn_a_00215.
20. Houde J.F., Nagarajan S.S., Sekihara K., Merzenich M.M. Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: an MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14:1125-1138. 10.1162/089892902760807140.
21. Hughes, G., Desantis, A., and Waszak, F. (in press). Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: the tole of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. Psychological Bulletin doi:10.1037/a0028566.
22. Hume, D. (1739/1896). A treatise of human nature. Oxford, UK: Clarendon. (Reprinted from the original edition in three volumes and edited, with an analytical index, by L. A. Selby-Bigge). Retrieved on Feb. 6, 2012. from oll.libertyfund.org/title/342.
23. Knolle F., Schröger E., Baess P., Kotz S.A. The cerebellum generates motor-to-auditory predictions: ERP lesion evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012, 24:698-706. 10.1162/jocn_a_00167.
24. Lange K. The reduced N1 to self-generated tones: an effect of temporal predictability?. Psychophysiology 2011, 48(8):1088-1095. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01174.x.
25. Makeig S., Müller M., Rockstroh B. Effects of voluntary movements on early auditory brain responses. Experimental Brain Research 1996, 110:487-492. 10.1007/BF00229149.
26. Martikainen M.H., Kaneko K., Hari R. Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:299-302. 10.1093/cercor/bhh131.
27. McCarthy G., Donchin E. The effects of temporal and event uncertainty in determining the waveforms of the auditory event related potential (ERP). Psychophysiology 1976, 13:581-590. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb00885.x.
28. McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1985, 62:203-208. 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90015-2.
29. McGrenere, J., Ho, W. (2000): Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000 May 15-17, 2000. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. pp. 179-186.
30. Miall R.C., Wolpert D.M. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks 1996, 9:1265-1279. 10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00035-4.
31. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:375-425. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x.
32. Norman D.A. The Design of Everyday Things 1989, Doubleday, New York.
33. Numminen J., Curio G. Differential effects of overt, covert and replayed speech on vowel-evoked responses of the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters 1999, 272:29-32. 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00573-X.
34. Nuwer M.R., Comi C., Emerson R., Fuglsang-Frederiksen A., Guerit J.-M., Hinrichs H. IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical. EEG Electroencephalography and Clinical Neuroscience 1998, 106:259-261. 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00106-5.
35. Ponton C., Eggermont J.J., Khosla D., Kwong B., Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling. Clinical Neurophysiology 2002, 113(3):407-420. 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00733-7.
36. Repp B.H., Knoblich G. Action can affect auditory perception. Psychological Science 2007, 18:6-7. 10.1111/j. 1467-9280.2007.01839.x.
37. SanMiguel, I., Todd, J., Schröger, E. (in press)Sensory suppression effects to self-initiated sounds mostly reflect the attenuation of the unspecific N1 component of the auditory ERP doi:10.1111/psyp.12024.
38. Schäfer E.W., Marcus M.M. Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. Science 1973, 181:175-177. 10.1126/science.181.4095.175.
39. Scherg M., Von Cramon D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section 1985, 62(1):32-44. 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90033-4.
40. Scherg M., Von Cramon D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section 1986, 65(5):344-360. 10.1016/0168-5597(86)90014-6.
41. Shadmehr R., Smith M.A., Krakauer J.W. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2010, 33:89-108. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153135.
42. Ventura M.I., Nagarajan S.S., Houde J.F. Speech target modulates speaking induced suppression in auditory cortex. BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10:58. 10.1186/1471-2202-10-58.
43. Wolpaw J.R., Penry J.K. A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1975, 39(6):609-620. 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90073-5.
44. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995, 269:1880-1882. 10.1126/science.7569931.