Sensory cancellation of self-movement facilitates visual motion detection

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 14, 2011, Pages 1-9

  Lally, Níall ^a,b   Frendo, Benjamin ^b   Diedrichsen, Jörn ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Biological motion; Detection discrimination; Motion 2D; Visuomotor integration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84855467725     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.14.5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aliu, S. O., Houde, J. F., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2009). Motor-induced suppression of the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 791-802.
2. Bays, P. M., Catalao, R. F., & Husain, M. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9(10):7, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/10/7, doi:10.1167/9.10.7.
3. Bays, P. M., & Wolpert, D. M. (2007). Predictive attenuation in the perception of touch. In P. Haggard (Ed.), Attention & performance XXII: Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition (pp. 339-358). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Bays, P. M., Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2005). Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven. Current Biology, 15, 1125-1128.
5. Blakemore, S. J., Goodbody, S. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Predicting the consequences of our own actions: The role of sensorimotor context estimation. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 7511-7518.
6. Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 635-640.
7. Bridgeman, B., Van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (1994). A theory of visual stability across saccadic eye movements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 247-258.
8. Christensen, A., Ilg, W., & Giese, M. A. (2011). Spatiotemporal tuning of the facilitation of biological motion perception by concurrent motor execution. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 3493-3499.
9. Craighero, L., Bello, A., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia, 40, 492-502.
10. Diedrichsen, J., Verstynen, T., Hon, A., Lehman, S. L., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). Anticipatory adjustments in the unloading task: Is an efference copy necessary for learning? Experimental Brain Research, 148, 272-276.
11. Farrer, C., Frey, S. H., Van Horn, J. D., Tunik, E., Turk, D., Inati, S., et al. (2007). The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 254-261.
12. Fisher, N. I. (1993). Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Haarmeier, T., Bunjes, F., Lindner, A., Berret, E., & Thier, P. (2001). Optimizing visual motion perception during eye movements. Neuron, 32, 527-535.
14. Hesse, M. D., Nishitani, N., Fink, G. R., Jousmaki, V., & Hari, R. (2010). Attenuation of somatosensory responses to self-produced tactile stimulation. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 425-432.
15. Kontaris, I., Wiggett, A. J., & Downing, P. E. (2009). Dissociation of extrastriate body and biologicalmotion selective areas by manipulation of visual-motor congruency. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3118-3124.
16. Kording, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). The loss function of sensorimotor learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 9839-9842.
17. Leube, D. T., Knoblich, G., Erb,M., Grodd,W., Bartels,M., & Kircher, T. T. J. (2003). The neural correlates of perceiving one's own movements. NeuroImage, 20, 2084-2090.
18. Lindner, A., Haarmeier, T., Erb, M., Grodd, W., & Thier, P. (2006). Cerebrocerebellar circuits for the perceptual cancellation of eye-movement-induced retinal image motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1899-1912.
19. Martikainen, M. H., Kaneko, K., & Hari, R. (2005). Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 299-302.
20. Martin, T. A., Keating, J. G., Goodkin, H. P., Bastian, A. J., & Thach, W. T. (1996). Throwing while looking through prisms. Brain, 119, 1183-1198.
21. Miall, R. C., Stanley, J., Todhunter, S., Levick, C., Lindo, S., & Miall, J. D. (2006). Performing hand actions assists the visual discrimination of similar hand postures. Neuropsychologia, 44, 966-976.
22. Newsome, W. T., & Pare, E. B. (1988). A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 2201-2211.
23. Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2007). Action can affect auditory perception. Psychological Science, 18, 6-7.
24. Rosenbaum, D. A., Dawson, A. M., & Challis, J. H. (2006). Haptic tracking permits bimanual independence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1266-1275.
25. Sato, A. (2008). Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequence of others' actions. Conscious and Cognition, 17, 1219-1227.
26. Shergill, S. S., Bays, P. M., Frith, C. D., & Wolpert, D. M. (2003). Two eyes for an eye: The neuroscience of force escalation. Science, 301, 187.
27. Sperry, R. W. (1950). Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 43, 482-489.
28. Synofzik, M., Lindner, A., & Thier, P. (2008). The cerebellum updates predictions about the visual consequences of one's behavior. Current Biology, 18, 814-818.
29. Synofzik, M., Thier, P., & Lindner, A. (2006). Internalizing agency of self-action: Perception of one's own hand movements depends on an adaptable prediction about the sensory action outcome. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 1592-1601.
30. Takahashi, C., Diedrichsen, J., & Watt, S. J. (2009). Integration of vision and haptics during tool use. Journal of Vision, 9(6):3, 1-13, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/6/3, doi:10.1167/9.6.3.
31. Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2003). Awareness of somatic events associated with a voluntary action. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 439-446.
32. Tsakiris, M., Longo, M. R., & Haggard, P. (2010). Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2740-2749.
33. Tseng,Y.W., Diedrichsen, J.,Krakauer, J.W., Shadmehr, R., &Bastian, A. J. (2007). Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 54-62.
34. von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das Reafferenzprincip. Naturwissenschaft, 37, 464-476.
35. Weiskrantz, L., Elliott, J., & Darlington, C. (1971). Preliminary observations on tickling oneself. Nature, 230, 598-599.
36. Wohlschlager, A. (2000). Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research, 40, 925-930.