MR imaging techniques of the bowel

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-11

  Santillan, Cynthia S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon; Crohn disease; Inflammatory bowel disease; Magnetic resonance colonography; Magnetic resonance enterography; Small bowel

Indexed keywords

GLUCAGON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT; SCOPOLAMINE;

CINE IMAGING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ENTERITIS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; INTESTINAL SPASM; INTESTINE RADIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PATIENT POSITIONING; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; RAPID FLUID SENSITIVE SEQUENCE; REVIEW; SCREENING TEST;

COLON; CROHN DISEASE; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE COLONOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ENTEROGRAPHY; SMALL BOWEL;

ANTIDIARRHEALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; ENEMA; FECES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTESTINAL DISEASES; INTESTINES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 84887606980     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: 15579786     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2013.07.004     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Paulsen S.R., Huprich J.E., Fletcher J.G., et al. CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. Radiographics 2006, 26(3):641-657. [discussion: 657-62].
2. Duszak R., Kim D.H., Pickhardt P.J. Expanding utilization and regional coverage of diagnostic CT colonography: early medicare claims experience. JAm Coll Radiol 2011, 8(4):235-241.
3. Panes J., Bouhnik Y., Reinisch W., et al. Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. JCrohns Colitis 2013, 7(7):556-585.
4. Brenner D.J., Hall E.J. Cancer risks from CT scans: now we have data, what next?. Radiology 2012, 265(2):330-331.
5. Gupta A., Postgate A.J., Burling D., et al. Aprospective study of MR enterography versus capsule endoscopy for the surveillance of adult patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 195(1):108-116.
6. Patak M.A., von Weymarn C., Froehlich J.M. Small bowel MR imaging: 1.5T versus 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007, 15(3):383-393. vii.
7. Adamek H.E., Schantzen W., Rinas U., et al. Ultra-high-field magnetic resonance enterography in the diagnosis of ileitis (Neo-)terminalis: a prospective study. JClin Gastroenterol 2012, 46(4):311-316.
8. Shellock F.G., Crues J.V. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004, 232(3):635-652.
9. American College of Radiology Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media ACR manual on contrast media 2013, Version 9, American College of Radiology, Reston (VA).
10. Svensson M.H., Svensson E., Lasson A., et al. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 2002, 222(2):337-345.
11. Lauenstein T.C., Goehde S.C., Debatin J.F. Fecal tagging: MR colonography without colonic cleansing. Abdom Imaging 2002, 27(4):410-417.
12. Ajaj W., Goyen M. MR imaging of the colon: "technique, indications, results and limitations". Eur J Radiol 2007, 61(3):415-423.
13. Achiam M.P., Logager V., Chabanova E., et al. Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy. Eur J Radiol 2010, 73(1):143-147.
14. Rieber A., Aschoff A., Nussle K., et al. MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2000, 10(9):1377-1382.
15. Maccioni F., Bruni A., Viscido A., et al. MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology 2006, 238(2):517-530.
16. Laghi A., Paolantonio P., Iafrate F., et al. Oral contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging of the bowel. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2002, 13(6):389-396.
17. Young B.M., Fletcher J.G., Booya F., et al. Head-to-head comparison of oral contrast agents for cross-sectional enterography: small bowel distention, timing, and side effects. JComput Assist Tomogr 2008, 32(1):32-38.
18. Lauenstein T.C., Schneemann H., Vogt F.M., et al. Optimization of oral contrast agents for MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 2003, 228(1):279-283.
19. Kuehle C.A., Ajaj W., Ladd S.C., et al. Hydro-MRI of the small bowel: effect of contrast volume, timing of contrast administration, and data acquisition on bowel distention. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 187(4):W375-W385.
20. Siddiki H., Fidler J. MR imaging of the small bowel in Crohn's disease. Eur J Radiol 2009, 69(3):409-417.
21. Darge K., Anupindi S.A., Jaramillo D. MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis in infants, children, and adolescents. Radiology 2011, 261(1):12-29.
22. Absah I., Bruining D.H., Matsumoto J.M., et al. MR enterography in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: retrospective assessment of patient tolerance, image quality, and initial performance estimates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012, 199(3):W367-W375.
23. Masselli G., Gualdi G. MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 2012, 264(2):333-348.
24. Ziech M.L., Bossuyt P.M., Laghi A., et al. Grading luminal Crohn's disease: which MRI features are considered as important?. Eur J Radiol 2012, 81(4):e467-e472.
25. Thornton E., Morrin M.M., Yee J. Current status of MR colonography. Radiographics 2010, 30(1):201-218.
26. Graser A. Magnetic resonance colonography. Radiol Clin North Am 2013, 51(1):113-120.
27. Lauenstein T.C., Ajaj W., Kuehle C.A., et al. Magneticresonance colonography: comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional vibe with two-dimensional FISP sequences: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol 2005, 40(2):89-96.
28. Zijta F.M., Nederveen A.J., Jensch S., et al. Feasibility of using automated insufflated carbon dioxide (CO2) for luminal distension in 3.0T MR colonography. Eur J Radiol 2012, 81(6):1128-1133.
29. Ajaj W., Lauenstein T.C., Pelster G., et al. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention?. JMagn Reson Imaging 2004, 19(2):216-221.
30. Rodriguez Gomez S., Pages Llinas M., Castells Garangou A., et al. Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms. Eur Radiol 2008, 18(7):1396-1405.
31. Bakir B., Acunas B., Bugra D., et al. MR colonography after oral administration of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution. Radiology 2009, 251(3):901-909.
32. Cronin C.G., Lohan D.G., Mhuircheartaigh J.N., et al. MRI small-bowel follow-through: prone versus supine patient positioning for best small-bowel distention and lesion detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008, 191(2):502-506.
33. Grand D.J., Beland M., Harris A. Magnetic resonance enterography. Radiol Clin North Am 2013, 51(1):99-112.
34. Froehlich J.M., Daenzer M., von Weymarn C., et al. Aperistaltic effect of hyoscine N-butylbromide versus glucagon on the small bowel assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2009, 19(6):1387-1393.
35. Gutzeit A., Binkert C.A., Koh D.M., et al. Evaluation of the anti-peristaltic effect of glucagon and hyoscine on the small bowel: comparison of intravenous and intramuscular drug administration. Eur Radiol 2012, 22(6):1186-1194.
36. Lauenstein T.C., Ajaj W., Narin B., et al. MR imaging of apparent small-bowel perfusion for diagnosing mesenteric ischemia: feasibility study. Radiology 2005, 234(2):569-575.
37. Schindera S.T., Nelson R.C., DeLong D.M., et al. Multi-detector row CT of the small bowel: peak enhancement temporal window-initial experience. Radiology 2007, 243(2):438-444.
38. Knuesel P.R., Kubik R.A., Crook D.W., et al. Assessment of dynamic contrast enhancement of the small bowel in active Crohn's disease using 3D MR enterography. Eur J Radiol 2010, 73(3):607-613.
39. Pauls S., Gabelmann A., Schmidt S.A., et al. Evaluating bowel wall vascularity in Crohn's disease: a comparison of dynamic MRI and wideband harmonic imaging contrast-enhanced low MI ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2006, 16(11):2410-2417.
40. Vandenbroucke F., Mortele K.J., Tatli S., et al. Noninvasive multidetector computed tomography enterography in patients with small-bowel Crohn's disease: is a 40-second delay better than 70 seconds?. Acta Radiol 2007, 48(10):1052-1060.
41. Rimola J., Ordas I., Rodriguez S., et al. Colonic Crohn's disease: value of magnetic resonance colonography for detection and quantification of disease activity. Abdom Imaging 2010, 35(4):422-427.
42. Brauck K., Zenge M.O., Vogt F.M., et al. Feasibility of whole-body MR with T2- and T1-weighted real-time steady-state free precession sequences during continuous table movement to depict metastases. Radiology 2008, 246(3):910-916.
43. Chavhan G.B., Babyn P.S., Jankharia B.G., et al. Steady-state MR imaging sequences: physics, classification, and clinical applications. Radiographics 2008, 28(4):1147-1160.
44. Rimola J., Ordas I., Rodriguez S., et al. Imaging indexes of activity and severity for Crohn's disease: current status and future trends. Abdom Imaging 2012, 37(6):958-966.
45. Sinha R., Rajiah P., Ramachandran I., et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract: technique, indications, and imaging findings. Radiographics 2013, 33(3):655-676.
46. Oto A., Kayhan A., Williams J.T., et al. Active Crohn's disease in the small bowel: evaluation by diffusion weighted imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. JMagn Reson Imaging 2011, 33(3):615-624.
47. Buisson A., Joubert A., Montoriol P.F., et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting and assessing ileal inflammation in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013, 37(5):537-545.
48. Oussalah A., Laurent V., Bruot O., et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance without bowel preparation for detecting colonic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2010, 59(8):1056-1065.
49. Froehlich J.M., Waldherr C., Stoupis C., et al. MR motility imaging in Crohn's disease improves lesion detection compared with standard MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2010, 20(8):1945-1951.
50. Menys A., Atkinson D., Odille F., et al. Quantified terminal ileal motility during MR enterography as a potential biomarker of Crohn's disease activity: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol 2012, 22(11):2494-2501.