MR motility imaging in Crohn's disease improves lesion detection compared with standard MR imaging

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1945-1951

  Froehlich, Johannes M ^a   Waldherr, Christian ^a   Stoupis, Christoforos ^a   Erturk, S Mehmet ^b   Patak, Michael A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b SISLI ETFAL TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Crohns disease; Motility; MRI; Peristalsis; Small bowel

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERIAL WALL THICKENING; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CINERADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CROHN DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ENTEROGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROHN DISEASE; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTESTINES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957932750     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1759-x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Travis SP, Stange EF, Lemann M et al (2006) European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: current management. Gut 55 (Suppl 1): i16-i35
2. Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, Gualdi G (2008) Comparison of MR enteroclysis with MR enterography and conventional enteroclysis in patients with Crohn's disease. Eur Radiol 18:438-447
3. Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L et al (2007) A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn's disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 17:2294-2301
4. Gourtsoyiannis NC, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G et al (2006) Imaging of small intestinal Crohn's disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 16:1915-1925
5. Froehlich JM, Patak MA, von Weymarn C, Juli CF, Zollikofer CL, Wentz KU (2005) Small bowel motility assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:370-375
6. Fidler J (2007) MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am 45:317-331
7. Antes G, Lissner J (1983) Doublecontrast small-bowel examination with barium and methylcellulose. Radiology 148:37-40
8. Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM, Rex D, Chernish SM (1987) Small bowel radiography: how, when, and why? Radiology 163:297-305
9. Sellink JL, Rosenbusch G (1981) ["The ten commandments" for enteroclysis or ten golden rules for proper enteroclysis technique]. Radiologe 21:366-376
10. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H (2000) Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 215:717-725
11. Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Rousomoustakaki M, Maris T, Gourtsoyiannis N (2001) MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. Radiographics 21 (Spec No): S161-S172
12. Girometti R, Zuiani C, Toso F et al (2008) MRI scoring system including dynamic motility evaluation in assessing the activity of Crohn's disease of the terminal ileum. Acad Radiol 15:153-164
13. Kitazume Y, Satoh S, Hosoi H, Noguchi O, Shibuya H (2007) Cine magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of peristalsis of small bowel with longitudinal ulcer in Crohn disease: preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:876-883
14. Patak MA, von Weymarn C, Froehlich JM (2007) Small bowel MR imaging: 1.5 T versus 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15:383-393 vii
15. Froehlich JM, Daenzer M, von Weymarn C, Erturk SM, Zollikofer CL, Patak MA (2009) Aperistaltic effect of hyoscine N-butylbromide versus glucagon on the small bowel assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 19:1387-1393
16. Patak MA, Froehlich JM, von Weymarn C, Breitenstein S, Zollikofer CL, Wentz KU (2007) Noninvasive measurement of small-bowel motility by MRI after abdominal surgery. Gut 56:1023-1025
17. Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, New York
18. Ajaj W, Goyen M, Schneemann H et al (2005) Oral contrast agents for small bowel distension in MRI: influence of the osmolarity for small bowel distension. Eur Radiology 15:1400-1406
19. Ajaj W, Goehde SC, Schneemann H, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC (2004) Dose optimization of mannitol solution for small bowel distension in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:648-653
20. Pettigrew RI, Oshinski JN, Chatzimavroudis G, Dixon WT (1999) MRI techniques for cardiovascular imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:590-601
21. Camilleri M, Bharucha AE, di Lorenzo C et al (2008) American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society consensus statement on intraluminal measurement of gastrointestinal and colonic motility in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol Motil 20:1269-1282
22. Vermillion DL, Huizinga JD, Riddell RH, Collins SM (1993) Altered small intestinal smooth muscle function in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 104:1692-1699
23. Siddiki HA, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG et al (2009) Prospective comparison of stateof-the-art MR enterography and CT enterography in small-bowel Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:113-121
24. Lee SS, Kim AY, Yang SK et al (2009) Crohn disease of the small bowel: comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and small-bowel followthrough as diagnostic techniques. Radiology 251:751-761