Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 143-147

  Achiam, M P ^a   Logager V ^a   Chabanova, E ^a   Thomsen, H S ^a   Rosenberg, J ^a  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bowel purgation; Colonoscopy; Fecal tagging; MR colonography; Patient acceptance

Indexed keywords

BEFORE AND AFTER; COLONOGRAPHY; COLONOSCOPY; GOLD STANDARDS; NON-INVASIVE; ORAL CONTRAST;

ENDOSCOPY;

RAYLEIGH SCATTERING;

BARIUM; FENTANYL CITRATE; FERUMOXSIL; GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE; MIDAZOLAM MALEATE; PHOSPHORAL; RECOMBINANT GLUCAGON; SCOPOLAMINE BUTYL BROMIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLU LIKE SYNDROME; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASTE ACUITY;

BARIUM SULFATE; COLONOSCOPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; DENMARK; FEMALE; FERROSOFERRIC OXIDE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; SILOXANES; STAINING AND LABELING;

EID: 73449102174     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Luboldt W., Bauerfeind P., Steiner P., Fried M., Krestin G.P., and Debatin J.F. Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 349 9061 (1997) 1288-1291
2. Peipins L.A., and Sandler R.S. Epidemiology of colorectal adenomas. Epidemiol Rev 16 2 (1994) 273-297
3. Ristvedt S.L., McFarland E.G., Weinstock L.B., and Thyssen E.P. Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 98 3 (March) (2003) 578-585
4. Svensson M.H., Svensson E., Lasson A., and Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222 2 (February) (2002) 337-345
5. Thomeer M., Vanbeckevoort D., Bielen D., et al. Virtual colonoscopy: a new screening tool for colorectal cancer?. JBR-BTR 84 4 (August) (2001) 155-163
6. Forbes G.M., and Mendelson R.M. Patient acceptance of virtual colonoscopy. Endoscopy 32 3 (March) (2000) 274-275
7. Zalis M.E., Perumpillichira J.J., Magee C., Kohlberg G., and Hahn P.F. Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability. Radiology 239 1 (April) (2006) 149-159
8. Goehde S.C., Descher E., Boekstegers A., et al. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdom Imaging 30 5 (September) (2005) 576-583
9. Hartmann D., Bassler B., Pfeifer B., et al. Patient acceptance of magnetic resonance colonography: a prospective inquiry for comparison to conventional colonoscopy. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 131 45 (November) (2006) 2519-2523
10. Kinner S., Kuehle C.A., Langhorst J., et al. MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients' acceptance in a screening population. Eur Radiol 17 9 (September) (2007) 2286-2293
11. Florie J., Birnie E., van Gelder R.E., et al. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy. Radiology 245 1 (October) (2007) 150-159
12. Langhorst J., Kuhle C.A., Ajaj W., et al. MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13 8 (August) (2007) 1001-1008
13. Achiam M.P., Chabanova E., Logager V., Thomsen H.S., and Rosenberg J. Implementation of MR colonography. Abdom Imaging 32 4 (July) (2007) 457-462
14. Hennessy M.J., Kirkby K.C., and Montgomery I.M. Comparison of the amnesic effects of midazolam and diazepam. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 103 4 (1991) 545-550
15. Ochs M.W., Tucker M.R., and White Jr. R.P. A comparison of amnesia in outpatients sedated with midazolam or diazepam alone or in combination with fentanyl during oral surgery. J Am Dent Assoc 113 6 (December) (1986) 894-897
16. Achiam M.P., Chabanova E., Logager V., Andersen L.P.H., Thomsen H.S., and Rosenberg J. MR Colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil. Acad Radiol 15 5 (May) (2008) 576-583
17. Wardle J., Sutton S., Williamson S., et al. Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening. Prev Med 31 4 (October) (2000) 323-334