Literature-Based Scientific Learning: A Collaboration Model

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 684-691

  Elrod, Susan L ^a   Somerville, Mary M ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36549034754     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Friedman T.L. The World is Flat (2005), Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY
2. Genomes Online Database v 2.0. Available: http://www.genomesonline.org (accessed March 20, 2007).
3. Campbell G. Education, information Technologies and the Augmentation of Human Intellect. Change 38 (2006) 26-31
4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute. The Accelerating Science Curriculum (1998), Chevy Chase, MD
5. See for example, Quinn Norton, "Science 2.0: Decades after the Internet was Created to Change How Researchers Communicate, It Truly Has," Seed Magazine, December 2006, 62-63.
6. See for example. Oblinger D.G., and Oblinger J.L. Educating the Net Generation (2005), EDUCAUSE, Washington, DC. http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen Available: www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
7. Graham L., and Metaxas P.T. Of Course It's True: I Saw It on the Internet-Critical Thinking in the Internet Era. Communications of the Associated Colleges of the Midwest (ACM) 46 (2003) 71-75
8. The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities (1998), State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York. http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf/ Available: http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf/
9. Pew Forum on Undergraduate Learning and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. National Survey of Student Engagement: The College Student Report (2000), The Pew Charitable Trusts, Philadelphia, PA. http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/edu_survey_student_engagement.pdf Available: http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/edu_survey_student_engagement.pdf
10. OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. OCLC White Paper on the Information Habits of College Students (2002), OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Dublin, Ohio. http://www.oclc.org/research/announcements/2002-06-24.htm Available: http://www.oclc.org/research/announcements/2002-06-24.htm
11. OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. College Students' Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources (2006), OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Dublin, Ohio. http://www.oclc.org/reports/perceptionscollege.htm Available: http://www.oclc.org/reports/perceptionscollege.htm
12. Wallis J. Cyberspace, Information Literacy, and the Information Society. Library Review 54 (2005) 218-222
13. Materska K. Librarians in the Knowledge Age. New Library World 105 (2004) 142-148
14. Lupton M. The Getting Of wisdom: Reflections of a Teaching Librarian. Australian Academic & Research Libraries 32 (2002). http://alia.org.au/publishing/aarl/33.2/full.text/lupton/html Available: http://alia.org.au/publishing/aarl/33.2/full.text/lupton/html
15. Maybee C. Undergraduate Perceptions of Information Use: The Basis for Creating User-Centered Student Information Literacy Instruction. Journal of Academic Librarianship 32 (January 2006) 79-85
16. Association of College and Research Libraries, Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (Chicago, Illinois: American Library Association, 2000). Available: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/standards.pdf; Association of College and Research Libraries, Objectives for Information Literacy Instruction: A Model Statement for Academic Librarians (Chicago, Illinois: American Library Association, 2001). Available: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/objectivesinformation.html; Association of College and Research Libraries, Characteristics of Programs of Information Literacy that Illustrate Best Practices: A Guideline (Chicago, Illinois: American Library Association, 2003). Available: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/characteristics.htm
17. In: Bundy A. (Ed). Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy framework: Principles, Standards, and Practices. 2nd ed. (2004), Australia and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy and Council of Australian University Librarians, Adelaide, Australia. http://www.caul.edu.au/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf Available: http://www.caul.edu.au/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf
18. Bruce C. The Phenomenon of Information Literacy. Higher Education Research and Development 17 1 (1998) 25-43
19. Candy P.C. Linking Thinking: Self-Directed Learning in the Digital Age (2004), Australian Government, Department of Education, Science, and Training, Canberra, Australia. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/training_skills/publications_resources/profiles/linking_thinking.htm Available: http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/training_skills/publications_resources/profiles/linking_thinking.htm
20. Society of College, National and University Libraries. Library Outcomes and Information Literacy (2004), Higher Education Academy, London, England. http://www.sconul.ac.uk/groups/information_literacy/papers/outcomes.pdf Available: www.sconul.ac.uk/groups/information_literacy/papers/outcomes.pdf
21. Lupton M. Overview. In: Bundy A. (Ed). Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, Standards, and Practice. 2nd ed. (2004), Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy and Council of Australian University Librarians, Adelaide, Australia 4. http://www.caul.edu.au/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf Available: http://www.caul.edu.au/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf
22. Christensen L., Stombler M., and Thaxton L. A Report on Librarian-Faculty Relations from a Sociological Perspective. Journal of Academic Librarianship 30 2 (2004) 116-121
23. Somerville M.M., Schader B., and Huston M. Rethinking What we Do and How We Do It: Systems Thinking Strategies for Library Leadership. Australian Academic and Research Libraries 36 (December 2005) 214-227
24. Somerville M.M., Mirijamdotter A., and Collins L. Systems Thinking and Information Literacy: Elements of a Knowledge Enabling Workplace Environment. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (2006), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, California. http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2006/2507/07/250770150.pdf Available: http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2006/2507/07/250770150.pdf
25. Somerville M.M., and Vuotto F. If You Build It With Them, They Will Come: Digital Research Portal Design and Development Strategies. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 10 (2005) 77-94
26. Somerville M.M., Huston M.E., and Mirijamdotter A. Building on What We Know: Staff Development in the Digital Age. The Electronic Library 23 4 (2005) 480-491
27. Mary M. Somerville, Erika Rogers, Anita Mirijamdotter, and Helen Partridge, "Collaborative Evidence-Based Information Practice: The Cal Poly Digital Learning Initiative" in Evidence-Based Librarianship: Case Studies and Active Learning Exercises, edited by Elizabeth Connor (Oxford, England: Chandos Publishing, 2007), pp. 141-161.
28. Davis H.L., and Somerville M.M. Learning Our Way to Change: Improved Institutional Alignment. New Library World 107 3/4 (April 2006) 127-140
29. Bruce C. The Relational Approach: A New Model for Information Literacy. The New Review of Information and Library Research 3 (1997) 1-22
30. Bruce C. Faculty-Librarian Partnerships in Australian Higher Education: Critical Dimensions. Reference Services Review 29 2 (2001) 106-115
31. Catts R. Preface. In: Bundy A. (Ed). Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, Standards, and Practice. 2nd ed. (2004), Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy and Council of Australian University Librarians, Adelaide, Australia. http://www.caul.edu.au/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf Available: http://www.caul.edu.au/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf
32. Gillette D.D., and Somerville M.M. Toward Lifelong 'Knowledge Making': Faculty Development in the Cal Poly Learning Commons. Lifelong Learning - Partners, Pathways, and Pedagogies: Proceedings of the 4th International Lifelong Learning Conference (2006), Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia 117-123
33. Kolb D. Experiential Learning (1983), Simon and Shuster, New York, NY
34. In: Bransford J.D., Brown A.L., and Cocking R.R. (Eds). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School (2000), National Academy Press, Washington, DC. http://books.nap.edu/catalogy/9853.html Available: http://books.nap.edu/catalogy/9853.html
35. Merizow J. Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning (1991), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
36. Cranton P. Teaching for Transformation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 93 (2002) 63-71
37. Lave J., and Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
38. Mary M. Somerville and Navjit Brar, "Collaborative Co-Design: The Cal Poly Digital Teaching Library User Centric Approach," in Information Access for Global Access: Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Libraries (New Delhi, India), pp. 175-187.
39. Kotter W.R. Bridging the Great Divide: Improving Relations Between Librarians and Classroom Faculty. Journal of Academic Librarianship 25 (1999) 294-303
40. Roldan M., and Yuhfen D.W. Building Context-Based Library Instruction. Journal of Education for Business 79 6 (July/August 2004) 323-327
41. Doskatsch I. Perceptions and Perplexities of the Faculty Librarian Partnership: An Australian Perspective. Reference Services Review 31 (2003) 111-121
42. Dewey B.I. The Embedded Librarian: Strategic Campus Collaborations. Resource Sharing and Information Networks 17 1/2 (2004) 5-17