Ti2448 pedicle screw system augmentation for posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 23, 2013, Pages 2008-2015

  Wang, Zheng ^a   Fu, Suochao ^b   Wu, Zi Xiang ^c   Zhang, Yang ^c   Lei, Wei ^c  

^a CHINESE PLA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

^b Guangzhou Military Region General Hospital   (China)

^c FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

cage stress; disc degeneration disease; intersegmental stability; posterior lumbar interbody fusion; screw stress; semi rigid internal fi xation; adjacent disc degeneration; stress shielding effect; Ti 24Nb 4Zr 7.9Sn (Ti2448); Ti 6Al 4V pedicle screw system

Indexed keywords

POLYETHERETHERKETONE; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR SPINE; MECHANICAL STRESS; NUCLEUS PULPOSUS; OSTEOPHYTE; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT; POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; POSTERIOR SPINE FUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; SPINAL CORD ATROPHY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THICKNESS; TRABECULAR BONE; YOUNG MODULUS;

ALLOYS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BONE SCREWS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPINAL FUSION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM;

EID: 84887322108     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a76fec     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Morishita Y, Ohta H, Naito M, et al. Kinematic evaluation of the adjacent segments after lumbar instrumented surgery: a comparison between rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 1480-5.
2. Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, et al. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 2510-7.
3. Cakir B, Carazzo C, Schmidt R, et al. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 1287-91.
4. Chou WY, Hsu CJ, Chang WN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002; 122: 39-43.
5. Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: 314-9.
6. Bono CM, Kadaba M, Vaccaro AR. Posterior pedicle fixation-based dynamic stabilization devices for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22: 376-83.
7. Ko CC, Tsai HW, Huang WC, et al. Screw loosening in the Dynesys stabilization system: radiographic evidence and effect on outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28: E10.
8. Hao YL, Li SJ, Sun SY, et al. Elastic deformation behaviour of Ti-24Nb-4Zr-7.9Sn for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 2007; 3: 277-86.
9. Liu ZM, Gao B, Zhang LZ. [Experimental study of Ti-24Nb-4Zr-7.9Sn alloy after treated with micro-arc oxidation in vivo]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2008; 26: 595-8.
10. Sha M, Guo Z, Fu J, et al. The effects of nail rigidity on fracture healing in rats with osteoporosis. Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 135-8.
11. Wu J, Liu ZM, Zhao XH, et al. Improved biological performance of microarc-oxidized low-modulus Ti-24Nb-4Zr-7.9Sn alloy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 92: 298-306.
12. Goel VK, Grauer JN, Patel TCh, et al. Effects of CHARITÉ artifi- cial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 2755-64.
13. Srilakshmi V. A Biomechanical Evaluation o f Dynamic Stabilization Systems. College of Engineering: The University of Toledo; Toledo, OH: 2005.
14. Goh JC, Wong HK, Thambyah A, et al. Influence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 35-9; discussion 40.
15. Oxland TR, Lund T. Biomechanics of stand-alone cages and cages in combination with posterior fixation: a literature review. Eur Spine J 2000; 9 (suppl 1): S95-101.
16. Sim HB, Murovic JA, Cho BY, et al. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 700-8.
17. Ekman P, Moller H, Shalabi A, et al. A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 1175-86.
18. Lin CY, Hsiao CC, Chen PQ, et al. Interbody fusion cage design using integrated global layout and local microstructure topology optimization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 1747-54.
19. Epstein NE. Circumferential cervical surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a multianalytic outcome study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 1340-5.
20. Schulte FA, Lambers FM, Kuhn G, et al. In vivo micro-computed tomography allows direct three-dimensional quantification of both bone formation and bone resorption parameters using time-lapsed imaging. Bone 2011; 48: 433-42.
21. Pitzen T, Geisler F, Matthis D, et al. A finite element model for predicting the biomechanical behaviour of the human lumbar spine. Control Eng Prac 2002; 10: 83-90.
22. Zhong ZC, Wei SH, Wang JP, et al. Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method. Med Eng Phys 2006; 28: 90-8.