Improved biological performance of microarc-oxidized low-modulus Ti-24Nb-4Zr-7.9Sn alloy

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 298-306

  Wu, Jiang ^a   Liu, Zheng Ming ^b   Zhao, Xiang Hui ^a   Gao, Yang ^a   Hu, Jiang ^a   Gao, Bo ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

titanium alloys; Biocompatibility; Osteoblast; Ti 24Nb 4Zr 7.9Sn

Indexed keywords

BINDING STRENGTH; BIOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE; BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; BONE LIKE APATITE; CELL MORPHOLOGY; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; ENERGY DISPERSIVE; LOW MODULUS; MICROARC; MICROARC OXIDATION; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; OSTEOBLAST CELLS; POROUS SURFACE; REMOVAL TORQUE; SCANNING ELECTRONS; SN ALLOYS;

ALLOYS; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; CERIUM ALLOYS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MORPHOLOGY; PHOSPHATE MINERALS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY; SURFACES; TIN; TIN ALLOYS; TITANIUM; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS; ZIRCONIUM;

TITANIUM ALLOYS;

ALLOY; NIOBIUM; TIN; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL GROWTH; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROPHILICITY; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; OSTEOBLAST; OXIDATION; RABBIT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TORQUE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ALLOYS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL SURVIVAL; COLORING AGENTS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOBLASTS; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; RABBITS; RATS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TETRAZOLIUM SALTS; THIAZOLES;

EID: 74749096908     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31515     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 1996;17:137-146.
2. Long M, Rack HJ. Titanium alloys in total joint replacementa materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998;19:1621-1639.
3. Feng B, Chen JY, Qi SK, He L, Zhao JZ, Zhang XD. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and bioactivity. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:457-464.
4. Koike M, Fujii H. In vitro assessment of corrosive properties of titanium as a biomaterial. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:540-548.
5. Semlitsch M, Staub F, Webber H. Titanium alloys for hip joint replacements. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1985;30:334-339.
6. Huiskes R. Stress shielding and bone resorption in THA: Clinical versus computer-simulation studies. Acta Orthop Belg 1993;59:118-129.
7. Hao YL, Li SJ, Sun SY, Zheng CY, Yang R. Elastic deformation behaviour of Ti-24Nb-4Zr-7.9Sn for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 2007;3:277-286.
8. Zhao Z, Wen S. Direct preparation of CaTi4 (PO4)6 coatings on the surface of titanium substrate by micro arc oxidation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:2275-2281.
9. Li LH, Konga YM, Kim HW, Kim YW, Kim HE, Heo SJ, Koak JY. Improved biological performance of Ti implants due to surface modification by micro-arc oxidation. Biomaterials 2004;24:2867-2875.
10. Li D, Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, Cochran DL, Sittig C, Hirt HP, Buser D. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:325-332.
11. De Groot K, Geesink R, Klein CPAT, Serekian P. Plasma sprayed coatings of hydroxylapatite. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:1375-1381.
12. Yerokhin AL, Nie X, Leyland A, Matthews A, Dowey SJ. Plasma electrolysis for surface engineering. Surf Coat Technol 1999;122:73-93.
13. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Albrektsson T. The electrochemical oxide growth behaviour on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytes. Med Eng Phys 2001;23:329-346.
14. 2-based coating after chemical treatment. Acta Biomater 2007;3:817-827.
15. Fini M, Cigada A, Rondelli G, Chiesa R, Giardino R, Giavaresi G, Aldini NN, Torricelli P, Vicentini B. In vitro and in vivo behaviour of Ca- and P-enriched anodized titanium. Biomaterials 1999;20:1587-1594.
16. Giavaresi G, Fini M, Cigada A, Chiesa R, Rondelli G, Rimondini L, Torricelli P, Toberto NN, Giardino R. Mechanical and histomorphometric evaluations of titanium implants with different surface treatments inserted in sheep cortical bone. Biomaterials 2003;24:1583-1594.
17. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, R, Oser K, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Oxidized implants and their influence on the bone response. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001;12:1025-1031.
18. Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: Special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials 2003;24:3893-3907.
19. ISO 7405:1997. Dentistry - Preclinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry - Test methods for dental materials.
20. Zhang LZ, Gao B, Liu ZM, Ma CF, Yan ZM. Physicochemical properties of Ti-24Nb-4Zr -7.9Sn treated with micro-arc oxidation. Chin J Conserv Dent 2008;18:277-280.
21. Cai K, Yao K, Lin S, Yang Z, Li X, Xie H, Qing T, Gao L. Poly(D,L-lactic acid) surfaces modified by silk fibroin: Effects on the culture of osteoblast in vitro. Biomaterials 2002;23:1153-1160.
22. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 1983;65:55-63.
23. D'lima DD, Lemperle SM, Chen PC, Holmes RE, Colwell CW Jr. Bone response to implanxt surface morphology. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:928-934.
24. Christian MP, Vijay KG, Malcolm HP. Biomechanical testing sequelae relevant to spinal fusion and instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am 1998;29:571-589.
25. Bloebaum RD, Mihalopolulus NL, Jensen JW, Dorn LD. Postmortem analysis of bone growth into porous-coated acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79:1013-1022.
26. Hallab NJ, Bundy KJ, Ko Connor RL, Moses JJ. Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion. Tissue Eng 2001;7:55-71.
27. Shimko DA, Shimko VF, Sander EA, Dickson KF, Nauman EA. Effect of porosity on the fluid flow characteristics and mechanical properties of tantalum scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;73:315-324.
28. Kunzler TP, Drobek T, Schuler M, Spencer ND. Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. Biomaterials 2007;28: 2175-2181.
29. Zhu XL, Chen J, Scheideler L, Reichl R, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials 2004;25:4087-4113.
30. Bhattarai SR, Bhattarai N, Viswanathamurthi P, Yi HK, Hwang PH, Kim HY. Hydrophilic nanofibrous structure of polylactide - Fabrication and cell affinity. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2006;78:247-257.
31. Schreckenbach JP, Marx G, Schlottig F, Textor M, Spencer ND. Characterization of anodic spark-converted titanium surfaces for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999;10:453-457.
32. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histo- morphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
33. Huang P, Zhang Y, Xu K, Han Y. Surface modification of titanium implant by microarc oxidation and hydrothermal treatment. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;70:187-190.
34. Sul YT, Johansson C, Byon E, Albrektsson T. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials 2005;26:6720-6730.
35. Steketee M, Balazovich K, Tosney KW. Filopodial initiation and a novel filament-organizing center, the focal ring. Mol Biol Cell 2001;12:2378-2395.