Effects of Charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol

Spine

Volumn 30, Issue 24, 2005, Pages 2755-2764

  Goel, Vijay K ^a,e   Grauer, Jonathan N ^b   Patel, Tushar Ch ^c   Biyani, Ashok ^a   Sairyo, Koichi ^a   Vishnubhotla, SriLakshmi ^a   Matyas, Aaron ^a   Cowgill, Ian ^a   Shaw, Miranda ^a   Long, Rebecca ^a   Dick, David ^a   Panjabi, Manohar M ^b   Serhan, Hassan ^d  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF OHIO   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Commonwealth Orthopedics ^*  (United States)

^d Synthes Technical Center   (United States)

^e The University of Toledo   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Charit artificial disc; Contact area and contact force; Finite element modeling; in vitro cadaver studies; Loads; Stresses

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; COBALT; POLYETHYLENE;

ARTICLE; BONE STRESS; DATA ANALYSIS; IMPLANT; LUMBAR SPINE; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SHEAR STRESS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 29444456951     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000195897.17277.67     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Axelsson P, Johnsson R, et al. The spondylolytic vertebra and its adjacent segment. Mobility measured before and after posterolateral fusion. Spine 1997;22:414-7.
2. Chen WJ, Lai PL, Niu CC, et al. Surgical treatment of adjacent instability after lumbar spine fusion. Spine 2001;26:E519-24.
3. Dekutoski MB, Schendel MJ, et al. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro adjacent segment motion after lumbar fusion. Spine 1994;19:1745-51.
4. Frymoye JW, Hanley EN Jr, et al. A comparison of radiographic findings in fusion and nonfusion patients ten or more years following lumbar disc surgery. Spine 1979;4:435-40.
5. Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:338-45.
6. Lee CK, Langrana NA. Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. Spine 1984;9:574-81.
7. Panjabi MM, Goel VK. Adjacent-level effects: Design of a new test protocol and finite element model simulations of disc replacement. In: Goel VK, Panjabi MM, eds. Roundtables in Spine Surgery; Spine Biomechanics: Evaluation of Motion Preservation Devices and Relevant Terminology. Vol 1. Issue 1. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2005:45-58.
8. Throckmorton TW, Hilibrand AS, Mencio GA, et al. The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine 2003;28:2546-50.
9. Goel VK, Gilbertson LG. The basic science of spinal instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;335:10-31.
10. Goel VK, Panjabi MM. Introduction. In: Goel VK, Panjabi MM, eds. Roundtables in Spine Surgery; Spine Biomechanics: Evaluation of Motion Preservation Devices and Relevant Terminology. Vol 1. Issue 1. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2005:9A-13A.
11. Lee CK, Goel VK. Artificial disc prosthesis: Design concepts and criteria. Spine J 2004;4:209S-218S.
12. Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, et al. Load sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment with an artificial disc. Spine 2001;26:E122-9.
13. Goel, VK, Dooris AP, McGowan D, et al. Biomechanics of the disc. In: Lewandrowski K-U, Yaszemski MJ, White AA III, et al, eds. Advances in Spinal Fusion-Molecular Science, Biomechanics, and Clinical Management. Somerville, CA: M&N Toscano; 2003:191-215.
14. Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, et al. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: Introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine 2003;28:S167-75.
15. Cunningham BW, Godron JD, Dmitriev AE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: An in vitro human cadaveric model Spine 2003;28:S110-7.
16. Panjabi MM. Biomechanical Testing to Identify Adjacent-Level Effects. Calgary, Canada: World Congress of Biomechanics; 2002.
17. Panjabi MM. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: Part I. A conceptual framework. Spine 1988;13:1129-34.
18. Goel VK. Three-dimensional motion behavior of the human spine - A question of terminology. J Biomech Eng 1987;109:353-5.
19. Goel VK, Vishnubhotla SL, Patel TC, et al. Load vs. displacement control testing protocols for evaluating artificial disc mechanics. Paper presented at: 51st Annual Orthopedic Research Society; February 20-23, 2005; Washington, DC.
20. Goel VK, Kim YE, Lim T-H, et al. An analytical investigation of the mechanics of spinal instrumentation. Spine 1988;13:1003-11.
21. Goel VK, Kong WZ, Han JS, et al. A combined finite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles. Spine 1993;18:1531-41.
22. Goel VK, Monroe BT, Gilbertson LG, et al. Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc: Finite element analysis of the L3 - motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads. Spine 1995;20:689-98.
23. Grosland NM. Spinal Adaptation in Response to Interbody Fusion Systems: A Theoretical Investigation [doctoral dissertation]. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa; 1998.
24. Goel VK, Grosland NM, Todd D, et al. Applications of the finite element models of the lumbar spine to predict clinically relevant biomechanics of spine surgery. Seminars Spine Surg 1998;10:112-20.
25. Goel VK, Gilbertson, LG. Applications of the finite element method to thoracolumbar spine research - Past, present, and future. Spine 1995;20:1719-27.
26. Goel VK, Ramirez SA, Kong W-Z, et al. Cancellous bone Young's modulus variation within the vertebral body of a ligament a lumbar spine - Application of bone adaptive remodeling concepts. J Biomech Eng 1995;117:266-71.
27. Kong WZ, Goel VK, Gilbertson LG. Prediction of biomechanical parameters in the lumbar spine during static sagittal plane lifting. J Biomech Eng 1998;120:273-80.
28. Konz RJ, Goel VK, Grobler LJ, et al. The pathomechanics of spondylolytic spondylolisthesis in immature primate lumbar spines - In vitro and finite element studies. Spine 2001;26:E38-49.
29. Lee, C-K, Kim Y-E, Jung J-M, et al. Impact response of the vertebral segment using a finite element model. Spine 2000;25:2431-9.
30. Lim TH, Goel VK, Winterbottom JM, et al. A comparison of stress induced porosity due to conventional and a modified spinal fixation device. J Spinal Disord 1994;7:1-11.
31. Scifert J, Totoribe K, Goel V, et al. Spinal cord mechanics during flexion and extension of the cervical spine. Pain Physician 2002;5:394-400.
32. Abumi K, Panjabi MM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine 1990;15:1142-7.
33. Hitchon PW, Goel VK, Rogge T, et al. Spinal stability with anterior or posterior ray threaded fusion cages. J Neurosurg 2000;93:102-8.
34. Lim T-H, An HS, Hasegawa T, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of diagonal fixation in pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine 2001;26:2498-503.
35. Wang S-T, Goel VK, Fu T-U, et al. Posterior instrumentation reduces differences in spine stability due to different cage orientations - An in vitro study. Spine 2005;30:62-7.
36. Panjabi MM, Krag MH, Goel VK. A technique for measurement and description of three-dimensional six degree-of-freedom motion of a body joint with application to human spine. J Biomech 1981;14:447-60.
37. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 2002;27:2431-4.
38. Guyer R. Clinical experience with Charité. Paper presented at: Proceedings of 3rd Annual Emerging Technologies in Spine Surgery; September 30-October 2, 2004; Washington, DC.
39. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective randomized FDA study of the Charité disc replacement - A radiographic-Outcome analysis of 276 consecutive patients. Paper presented at: 31st Annual Meeting of International Society for the Study of Lumbar Spine; May 31-June 5, 2004; Porto, Portugal.
40. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, et al. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. Spine 2003;28:384-9.