Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1287-1291

  Cakir, Balkan ^b   Carazzo, Charles ^c   Schmidt, René ^a   Mattes, Thomas ^c   Reichel, Heiko ^c   Käfer, Wolfram ^c  

^a KLINIK AM EICHERT   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Adjacent segment mobility; Dynesys; Lumbar fusion; Range of motion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLAUDICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; SPINE MOBILITY; SPINE STABILIZATION; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; JOINT INSTABILITY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PLIABILITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTURE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SPINAL STENOSIS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 67651155975     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a136ab     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Mayer M. Spine arthroplasty: a historical review. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):65-84.
2. Olsewski JM, Schendel MJ, Wallace LJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and biological changes in injured intervertebral discs under normal and increased mechanical demands. Spine 1996;21:1945-1951
3. Phillips FM, Reuben J, Wetzel FT. Intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to a lumbar fusion. An experimental rabbit model. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:289-294
4. Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, et al. Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine 1998;23:1550-1558 (Pubitemid 28459959)
5. Panjabi M, Henderson G, Abjornson C, et al. Multidirectional testing of one- and two-level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions. Spine 2007;32:1311-1319 (Pubitemid 46791450)
6. Panjabi M, Malcolmson G, Teng E, et al. Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions. Spine 2007;32:959-966 (Pubitemid 46646766)
7. Cakir B, Richter M, Huch K, et al. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine. Int Orthop 2006;12:128-136
8. Mayer HM, Korge A. Non-fusion technology in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders: facts, questions, challenges. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):85-91. (Pubitemid 35244937)
9. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):S170-8. (Pubitemid 35244951)
10. Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, et al. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:418-423 (Pubitemid 36959456)
11. Beastall J, Karadimas E, Siddiqui M, et al. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings. Spine 2007;32:685-690 (Pubitemid 46573309)
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
13. Chow DH, Luk KD, Evans JH, et al. Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments. Spine 1996; 21:549-555
14. Nagata H, Schendel MJ, Transfeldt EE, et al. The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral motion. Spine 1993;18:2471-2479 (Pubitemid 24001357)
15. Esses SI, Doherty BJ, Crawford MJ, et al. Kinematic evaluation of lumbar fusion techniques. Spine 1996;21:676-684
16. Ha KY, Schendel MJ, Lewis JL, et al. Effect of immobilization and configuration on lumbar adjacent-segment biomechanics. J Spinal Disord 1993;6: 99-105.
17. Cakir B, Ulmar B, Koepp H, et al. Dorsale dynamische Stabilisierung als Alternative zur dorso-ventralen Fusion bei Spinalkanalstenose mit degenerativer Instabilitat. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2003;141:418-424 (Pubitemid 37093975)
18. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, et al. Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 2005;30:324-331 (Pubitemid 40209259)
19. Putzier M, Schneider SV, Funk JF, et al. The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone. Spine 2005;30:E109-14.
20. Schnake KJ, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B. Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 2006;31:442-449 (Pubitemid 43361743)
21. Welch WC, Cheng BC, Awad TE, et al. Clinical outcomes of the Dynesys dynamic neutralization system: 1-year preliminary results. Neurosurg Focus 2007;22:E8.
22. Bordes Monmeneu M, Bordes Garcia V, Rodrigo Baeza F, et al. Sistema de neutralizacion dinamica en la coluna lumbar. SISTEMA DYNESYS. Experiencia en 94 casos. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2005;16:499-506.
23. Würgler-Hauri CC, Kalbarczyk A, Wiesli M, et al. Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompression in acquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability. Spine 2008;33:E66-72. (Pubitemid 351322944)
24. Panjabi MM. Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007;22:257-265
25. Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC, et al. Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behavior of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J 2006;15:913-922
26. Cunningham BW, Kotani Y, McNulty PS, et al. The effect of spinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. Spine 1997;22:2655-2663 (Pubitemid 28070657)
27. Weinhoffer SL, Guyer RD, Herbert M, et al. Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine 1995;20: 526-531
28. Dekutoski MB, Schendel MJ, Ogilvie JW, et al. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro adjacent segment motion after lumbar fusion. Spine 1994;19:1745-1751 (Pubitemid 24314184)
29. Kotani Y, Cunningham BW, Cappuccino A, et al. The effects of spinal fixation and destabilization on the biomechanical and histologic properties of spinal ligaments. An in vivo study. Spine 1998;23:672-682 (Pubitemid 28157838)