Involving the public in systematic reviews: A narrative review of organizational approaches and eight case examples

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Volumn 1, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 409-420

  Boote, Jonathan ^a   Baird, Wendy ^a   Sutton, Anthea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

literature review; public involvement; systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

CASE STUDY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA EXTRACTION; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH PRIORITY; RESEARCH SUBJECT; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

EID: 84886944549     PISSN: 20426305     EISSN: 20426313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/cer.12.46     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Department of Health. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (2nd Edition). Department of Health, London, UK (2005).
2. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Public Law 111-148 (2010).
3. Boote J, Baird W, Sutton A. Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: A narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 102, 105-116 (2011).
4. Evans D. Hierarchy of evidence: A framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. J. Clin. Nurs. 12, 77-84 (2003). (Pubitemid 37260025)
5. Wale J, Colombo C, Belizan M, Nadel J. International health consumers in The Cochrane Collaboration: Fifteen years on. J. Ambul. Care Manage. 33(3), 182-189 (2010).
6. Kreis J, Puhan MA, Schunemann HJ, Dickersin K. Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research. Health Expect. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.00722.x (2012) (Epub ahead of print).
7. Kelson M. Consumer collaboration, patient-defined outcomes and the preparation of Cochrane Reviews. Health Expect. 2(2), 129-135 (1999). (Pubitemid 29290805)
8. Skoetz N, Weingart O, Engert A. Resources review. A consumer network for haematological malignancies. Health Expect. 8, 86-90 (2005). (Pubitemid 40343320)
9. Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A et al. Consumer-driven health care: Building partnerships in research. Health Expect. 8(4), 352-359 (2005). (Pubitemid 41641185)
10. Ghersi D. Making it happen: Approaches to involving consumers in Cochrane reviews. Eval. Health Prof. 25(3), 270-283 (2002). (Pubitemid 34857808)
11. Sakala C, Gyte G, Henderson S, Neilson JP, Horey D. Consumer-professional partnership to improve research: The experience of the Cochrane Collaboration's Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. Birth 28(2), 133-129 (2001).
12. Vale C, Tierney J Spera N, Whelan A, Nightingale A, Hanley B. Evaluation of patient involvement in a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data in cervical cancer treatment. Syst. Rev. 1(1), 23 (2012).
13. Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman AD. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 3, CD004563 (2006).
14. Braye S, Preston-Shoot M. Emerging out of the shadows? Service user and carer involvement in systematic reviews. Evid. Policy 1(2), 173-194 (2005).
15. Smith E, Donovan S, Beresford P et al. Getting ready for user involvement in a systematic review. Health Expect. 2, 197-208 (2009).
16. Serrano-Aguilar P, Trujillo-Martín MM, Ramos-Goni JM, Mahtani-Chugan V, Perestelo-Pérez L, Posada-de la Paz M. Patient involvement in health research: A contribution to a systematic review on the effectiveness of treatments for degenerative ataxias. Soc. Sci. Med. 69(6), 920-925 (2009).
17. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: A review and research agenda. Health Policy 61(2), 213-236 (2002). (Pubitemid 34669916)
18. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: Individual patient data meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD008285 (2010).
19. Telford R, Boote J, Cooper C. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expect. 7(3), 209-220 (2004). (Pubitemid 39166370)
20. Boote J, Barber R, Cooper C. Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: Results of a Delphi study and sub-group analysis. Health Policy 75(3), 280-297 (2006). (Pubitemid 43042362)
21. Braye S, Preston-Shoot M, Johns R. Law in social work education: Reviewing the evidence on teaching, learning and assessment. Social Work Education 24(5), 547-563 (2005).
22. Smith E, Ross F, Donovan S et al. User Involvement in the Design and Undertaking of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting Research. NCCSDO, London, UK (2005).
23. Smith E, Ross F, Donovan S et al. Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: A review of evidence and practice. Int. J. Nurs. Studies 45, 298-315 (2008).
24. Trujillo-Martín MM, Serrano-Aguilar P, Monton-Alvarez F, Carrillo-Fumero R. Effectiveness and safety of treatments for degenerative ataxias: A systematic review. Mov. Disord. 24(8), 1111-1124 (2009).
25. Rose D, Wykes T, Leese M, Bindman J, Fleischmann P. Patients' perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy: Systematic review. BMJ 326, 1363-1367 (2003).
26. Rees R, Kavanagh J, Burchett H et al. HIV Health Promotion and Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM): A Systematic Review of Research Relevant to the Development and Implementation of Effective and Appropriate Interventions. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK (2004).
27. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin. Oncol. 26, 5802-5812 (2008).