Evaluation of patient involvement in a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data in cervical cancer treatment

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2005, Pages

  Vale, Claire L ^a   Tierney, Jayne F ^a   Spera, Nicolette ^a   Whelan, Andrea ^a   Nightingale, Alison ^a   Hanley, Bec ^a  

^a MRC CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Consumer involvement; Individual patient data; Public and patient involvement; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; FEMALE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84876391155     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-23     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care 2005, UK Department of Health, London, 2, http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4108962.
2. Best Research for Best Health. London: A new national health research strategy (2006) UK Department of Health (Research and Development Directorate). http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4127127.
3. NHMRC (Australia) Health and Medical Research Strategic Review: The Virtuous Cycle - Working together for health and medical research December 1998. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/8F72CFAE3493111DCA257058007A16BE/$File/summary_document.pdf.
4. Horey D. Consumer Involvement in the Cochrane Collaboration. Presented at The Cochrane Collaboration's Mid-Year Strategic Meeting; Auckland AUS, March 2010. http://consumers.cochrane.org/sites/consumers.cochrane.org/files/uploads/Consumer%20Involvement%20in%20the%20Cochrane%20Collaboration%20Background%20paper.pdf.
5. Boote J, Baird W, Sutton A. Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 2011, 102:105-116. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.002, 21641075.
6. Rose D, Wykes T, Leese M, Bindman J, Fleischmann P. Patients' perspectives on electronconvulsive therapy: systematic review. BMJ 2003, 326:1363-1367. 10.1136/bmj.326.7403.1363, 162130, 12816822.
7. Rees R, Kavanagh J, Burchett H, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Harden A, et al. HIV health promotion and men who have had sex with men (MSM): a systematic review of research relevant to the development and implementation of effective and appropriate interventions 2004, EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London.
8. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26:5802-5812. 2645100, 19001332, Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration.
9. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC) Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(Issue 1) (2010), Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC).
10. Vale CL, Tierney JF, Davidson SE, Drinkwater KJ, Symonds P. Substantial improvement in UK cervical cancer survival with chemoradiotherapy: results of a Royal College of Radiologists' audit. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2010, 22:590-601.
11. Vale C, Nightingale A, Spera N, Whelan A, Hanley B, Tierney JF. Late complications from chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: reflections from cervical cancer survivors 10 years after the national cancer institute alert. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2010, 22:588-589.