PhyloTreePruner: A phylogenetic tree-based approach for selection of orthologous sequences for phylogenomics

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Volumn 2013, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 429-435

  Kocot, Kevin M ^a   Citarella, Mathew R ^b,c   Moroz, Leonid L ^b,c   Halanych, Kenneth M ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene tree; Orthology; Paralogy; Phylogenomic

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; ORTHOLOGY; PARALOGY; PHYLOGENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOTREEPRUNER; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ARTHROPODA;

EID: 84886806794     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11769343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/EBO.S12813     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Telford MJ. Phylogenomics. Curr Biol. 2007;17(22):R945-6.
2. Telford MJ. Resolving animal phylogeny: a sledgehammer for a tough nut? Dev Cell. 2008;14(4):457-9.
3. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, et al. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature. 2008;452(7188):745-9.
4. Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, et al. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc Biol Sci. 2009;276(1677): 4261-70.
5. Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, et al. Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature. 2011;471(7336):95-8.
6. Kocot KM, Cannon JT, Todt C, et al. Phylogenomics reveals deep molluscan relationships. Nature. 2011;477(7365):452-6.
7. Smith SA, Wilson NG, Goetz FE, et al. Resolving the evolutionary relationships of molluscs with phylogenomic tools. Nature. 2011;480(7377): 364-7.
8. Torruella G, Derelle R, Paps J, et al. Phylogenetic relationships within the Opisthokonta based on phylogenomic analyses of conserved single-copy protein domains. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29(2):531-44.
9. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Marcet-Houben M, Gabaldón T. Phylogenomics supports microsporidia as the earliest diverging clade of sequenced fungi. BMC Biol. 2012;10:47.
10. Timme RE, Bachvaroff TR, Delwiche CF. Broad phylogenomic sampling and the sister lineage of land plants. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29696.
11. Pick KS, Philippe H, Schreiber F, et al. Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27(9):1983-7.
12. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Lavrov DV, et al. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol. 2011;9(3): e1000602.
13. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003;13(9):2178-89.
14. Ostlund G, Schmitt T, Forslund K, et al. InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38(Database issue):D196-203.
15. Kim K, Kim W, Kim S. ReMark: an automatic program for clustering orthologs flexibly combining a Recursive and a Markov clustering algorithms. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(12):1731-3.
16. Linard B, Thompson JD, Poch O, Lecompte O. OrthoInspector: comprehensive orthology analysis and visual exploration. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:11.
17. Mahmood K, Webb GI, Song J, Whisstock JC, Konagurthu AS. Efficient large-scale protein sequence comparison and gene matching to identify orthologs and co-orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(6):e44.
18. DeLuca TF, Cui J, Jung JY, St Gabriel KC, Wall DP. Roundup 2.0: enabling comparative genomics for over 1800 genomes. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(5): 715-6.
19. Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(7):1575-84.
20. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403-10.
21. Chen F, Mackey AJ, Vermunt JK, Roos DS. Assessing performance of orthology detection strategies applied to eukaryotic genomes. PLoS One. 2007;2(4):e383.
22. Gabaldón T. Large-scale assignment of orthology: back to phylogenetics? Genome Biol. 2008;9(10):235.
23. Altenhoff AM, Dessimoz C. Phylogenetic and functional assessment of orthologs inference projects and methods. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5(1): e1000262.
24. Martin, AP, Burg, TM. 2002. Perils of paralogy: using HSP70 genes for inferring organismal phylogenies. Syst Biol. 2002;51(4):570-87.
25. Pirie MD, Vargas MP, Botermans M, Bakker FT, Chatrou LW. Ancient paralogy in the cpDNA trnL-F region in Annonaceae: implications for plant molecular systematics. Am J Bot. 2007;94(6):1003-16.
26. Struck TH. The impact of paralogy on phylogenomic studies-a case study on annelid relationships. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e62892.
27. Ebersberger I, Strauss S, von Haeseler A. HaMStR: profile hidden markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:157.
28. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(2): 511-8.
29. Talavera G, Castresana J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 2007;56(4):564-77.
30. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9490.
31. Roure B, Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N, Philippe H. SCaFoS: a tool for selection, concatenation and fusion of sequences for phylogenomics. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7 Suppl 1:S2.
32. Kück P, Meusemann K. FASconCAT: Convenient handling of data matrices. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;56(3):1115-8.
33. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(21):2688-90.
34. Trautwein MD, Wiegmann BM, Beutel R, Kjer KM, Yeates DK. Advances in insect phylogeny at the dawn of the postgenomic era. Annu Rev Entomol. 2012;57:449-68.
35. Letsch HO, Meusemann K, Wipfler B, Schütte K, Beutel R, Misof B. Insect phylogenomics: results, problems and the impact of matrix composition. Proc Biol Sci. 2012;279(1741):3282-90.