In pursuit of procedural justice: Lessons from an analysis of 56 forest carbon project designs

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 968-979

  Marion Suiseeya, Kimberly R ^a   Caplow, Susan ^b,c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental justice; Forest carbon; Global environmental governance; Voluntary carbon certification standards

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CERTIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; ETHICS; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIAL IMPACT; STAKEHOLDER; STANDARD (REGULATION); VOLUNTARY APPROACH;

EID: 84886725431     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Agrawal A., Gibson C.C. Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 1999, 27:629-649.
2. Agrawal A., Nepstad D., Chhatre A. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2011, 36(36):373-396.
3. Agrawal A., Redford K. Conservation and displacement: an overview. Conservation and Society 2009, 7:1-10.
4. Ananda J., Herath G. Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: a value function approach. Ecological Economics 2003, 45:75-90.
5. Appelstrand M. Participation and societal values: the challenge for lawmakers and policy practitioners. Forest Policy and Economics 2002, 4:281-290.
6. Bartley T. Transnational governance as the layering of rules: intersections of public and private standards. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2011, 12:517-542.
7. Bartley T., Smith S.N. 15 Communities of practice as cause and consequence of transnational governance: the evolution of social and environmental certification. Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance 2010, 347.
8. Bernstein S., Cashore B. Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation & Governance 2007, 1:347-371.
9. Binmore K., Sen A. The idea of justice. Science 2010, 329:1286.
10. Blaikie P., Brookfield H. Land Degradation and Society 1987, Methuen & Co. Ltd.
11. Boyd D.E., Spekman R.E., Kamauff J.W., Werhane P. Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains: a procedural justice perspective. Long Range Planning 2007, 40:341-356.
12. Brooks J.S., Franzen M.A., Holmes C.M., Grote M.N., Mulder M.B. Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 2006, 20:1528-1538.
13. Brown D., Seymour F., Peskett L. How do we achieve REDD co-benefits and avoid doing harm?. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications 2008, 156. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
14. Buchy M., Hoverman S. Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review. Forest Policy and Economics 2000, 1:15-25.
15. Campbell L.M., Vainio-Mattila A. Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned?. Human Ecology 2003, 31:417-437.
16. Cashore B. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance 2002, 15:503-529.
17. Cashore B.W. Governing through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-state Authority 2004, Yale University Press.
18. Chambers R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 1994, 22:953-969.
19. Clayton S. Preference for macrojustice versus microjustice in environmental decisions. Environment and Behavior 1998, 30:162-183.
20. Colchester M. Conservation policy and indigenous peoples. Environmental Science and Policy 2004, 7:145-153.
21. Conrad E., Cassar F., Jones L., Eiter M., Izaovičová S., Barankova Z., Christie Z., Fazey M.I. Rhetoric and reporting of public participation in landscape policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2011, 13:23-47.
22. Conroy M.E. Branded!: how the 'certification revolution' is transforming global corporations 2007, New Society Publishers.
23. Cooke B., Kothari U. Participation: The New Tyranny? 2001, Zed Books, London, New York.
24. Cotula L., Mayers J. Tenure in REDD: Start-point or Afterthought? 2009, IIED, London.
25. Doherty E., Schroeder H. Forest tenure and multi-level governance in avoiding deforestation under REDD+. Global Environmental Politics 2011, 11:66.
26. Falkner R. Private environmental governance and international relations: exploring the links. Global Environmental Politics 2003, 3:72-87.
27. Forsyth T. Political ecology and the epistemology of social justice. Geoforum 2008, 39:756-764.
28. Forsyth T., Sikor T. Forests, development and the globalisation of justice. The Geographical Journal 2013.
29. Gardner R., Walker J. Rules, Games, and Common-pool Resources 1994, University of Michigan Press.
30. Gibson C., MacKean M.A., Ostrom E. People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance 2000, The MIT Press.
31. Glasmeier A.K., Farrigan T. Understanding community forestry: a qualitative meta-study of the concept, the process, and its potential for poverty alleviation in the United States case. The Geographic Journal 2005, 171:56-69.
32. Glotzbach S., Baumgartner S. The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational ecological justice. Environmental Value 2012, 21:331.
33. Gourevitch P.A., Lake D.A., Stein J.G. The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue is Not Enough 2012, Cambridge University Press.
34. Gross C. A measure of fairness: an investigative framework to explore perceptions of fairness and justice in real-life social conflict. Human Ecology Review 2008, 15:130.
35. Gulbrandsen L.H. Overlapping public and private governance: can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime?. Global Environmental Politics 2004, 4:75-99.
36. Gulbrandsen L.H. The effectiveness of non-state governance schemes: a comparative study of forest certification in Norway and Sweden. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2005, 5:125-149.
37. Harvey C.A., Dickson B., Kormos C. Opportunities for achieving biodiversity conservation through REDD. Conservation Letters 2010, 3:53-61.
38. Hickey S., Mohan G. Participation - From Tyranny to Transformation?: Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development 2004, Zed Books.
39. Kanowski P.J., McDermott C.L., Cashore B.W. Implementing REDD+: lessons from analysis of forest governance. Environmental Science & Policy 2011, 14:111-117.
40. Klooster D. Community Foresty and Tree Theft in Mexico: Resistance or Complicity in Conservation?. Development & Change 2000, 31:281-305.
41. Klooster D. Standardizing sustainable development? The Forest Stewardship Council's plantation policy review process as neoliberal environmental governance. Geoforum 2010, 41:117-129.
42. Lawlor K., Weinthal E., Olander L. Institutions and policies to protect rural livelihoods in REDD+ regimes. Global Environmental Politics 2010, 10:1-11.
43. Lemos M.C., Agrawal A. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment & Resources 2006, 31:29p.
44. Lewis J.L., Sheppard S.R.J. Culture and communication: can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities?. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 77:291-313.
45. Li T.M. Engaging simplifications: community-based resource management, market processes and state agendas in upland Southeast Asia. World Development 2002, 30:265-283.
46. Littig B., Griessler E. Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development 2005, 8:65-79.
47. Lundy P. Community participation in Jamaican conservation projects. Community Development Journal 1999, 34:122-132.
48. Madeira E.M. REDD in Design: Assessment of Planned First-Generation Activities in Indonesia, Discussion PAper. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC 2009, 16.
49. Marion Suiseeya K. Just Rhetoric? Examining the Politics of Global Forest Governance from the Ground Up 2013, International Studies Association, San Francisco, California.
50. Martin A., McGuire S., Sullivan S. Global environmental justice and biodiversity conservation. The Geographical Journal 2013, 179:122-131.
51. McDermott M.H., Schreckenberg K. Equity in community forestry: insights from North and South. International Forestry Review 2009, 11:157-170.
52. Nightingale A.J. Participating or just sitting in? The dynamics of gender and caste in community forestry. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 2002, 2:1.
53. Okereke C. Global environmental sustainability: intergenerational equity and conceptions of justice in multilateral environmental regimes. Geoforum 2006, 37:725-738.
54. Okereke C. Global Justice and Neoliberal Environmental Governance: Ethics, Sustainable Development, and International Co-operation 2008, Routledge, London.
55. Okereke C., Dooley K. Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation: towards a post-kyoto climate agreement. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20:82-95.
56. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action 1990, Cambridge University Press, New York.
57. Overdevest C. Comparing forest certification schemes: the case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector. Socio-Economic Review 2010, 8:47-76.
58. Pagdee A., Kim Y.-s., Daugherty P.J. What makes community forest management successful: a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources 2006, 19:33-52.
59. Peluso N.L. Coercing conservation: the politics of state resource control. Global Environmental Change 1993, 3:199-217.
60. Perhac R.M. Environmental justice: the issue of disproportionality. Environmental Ethics 1999, 21:81-92.
61. Peskett L., Huberman D., Jones E.B., Edwards G., Brown J. Making REDD Work for the Poor. Poverty Environment Partnership 2008, 79.
62. Potoski M., Prakash A. Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms' regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science 2005, 49:235-248.
63. Raines S.S. Perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy in international environmental management standards: the impact of the participation gap. Global Environmental Politics 2003, 3:47-73.
64. Ribot J. Seeing REDD for local democracy: a call for democracy standards. Common Voices 2011, 3:14-16.
65. Richards M., Panfil S.N. Towards cost-effective social impact assessment of REDD+ projects: meeting the challenge of multiple benefit standards. International Forestry Review 2011, 13:1-12.
66. Roe D. The origins and evolution of the conservation-poverty debate: a review of key literature, events and policy processes. Oryx 2008, 42:491-503.
67. Schlosberg D. Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics 2004, 13:517-540.
68. Schlosberg D. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements and Nature 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
69. Schroeder D., Pogge T. Justice and the convention on biological diversity. Ethics & International Affair 2009, 23:267.
70. Sikor T. Justice and Injustices of REDD+, Beyond Carbon: Ensuring Justice and Equity in REDD+ Across Levels of Governance 2012, St. Anne's College, Oxford University.
71. Sikor T., Stahl J. Forests and People: Property, Governance, and Human Rights 2011, Earthscan, Abingdon, Oxon, New York.
72. Sikor T., Stahl J., Enters T., Ribot J.C., Singh N., Sunderlin W.D., Wollenberg L. REDD-plus, forest people's rights and nested climate governance. Global Environmental Change 2010.
73. Singleton S. Co-operation or capture? The paradox of co-management and community participation in natural resource management and environmental policy-making. Environmental Politics 2000, 9:1-21.
74. Smith P.D., McDonough M.H. Beyond public participation: fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources 2001, 14:239-249.
75. Starobin S., Weinthal E. The search for credible information in social and environmental global governance: the kosher label. Business and Politics 2010, 12:1-35.
76. Strassburg B.B.N., Vira B., Mahanty S., Mansourian S., Martin A., Dawson N., Gross-Camp N., Latawiec A., Swainson L. Social and economic considerations relevant to REDD+. Understanding relationships between biodiversity, carbon, forests and people: the key to achieving REDD+ objectives. A global assessment report. Prepared by the global forest expert panel on biodiversity, forest management, and REDD+ 2012, 161. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), Vienna. J.A. Parrotta, C. Wildburger, S. Mansourian (Eds.).
77. The Climate Community and Biodiversity Alliance, 2008. Climate, Community and Biodiversity Project Design Standards, second edition. CCBA, Arlington, VA.
78. The Climate Community and Biodiversity Alliance, 2010. Rules for the use of the Climate, Community, and Biodiversity Standards, Version June 21, 2012 edition, . http://www.climate-standards.org/.
79. The Climate Community and Biodiversity Alliance, 2012. List of auditors approved to validate and verify projects against the Climate, Community & Biodiversity (CCB) Standards, Version June 21, 2012 edition, https://s3.amazonaws.com/CCBA/Approved_CCBS_Auditors.pdf.
80. Vandergeest P. Certification and communities: alternatives for regulating the environmental and social impacts of shrimp farming. World Development 2007, 35:1152-1171.
81. Walker, G., 2012. Environmental justice: concepts, evidence and politics. Routledge, London.
82. Walker G.P., Bulkeley H. Geographies of environmental justice. Geoforum 2006, 37:655-659.
83. Warner M. 'Consensus' participation: an example for protected areas planning. Public Administration and Development 1997, 17:413-432.
84. West P., Igoe J., Brockington D. Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology 2006, 35:251-277.
85. Wollenberg E., Springate-Beginski O. Incentives+: how can REDD improve well-being in forest communities?, infobrief 2009, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
86. Wood R.G. Carbon finance and pro-poor benefits: the Glod Standard and Climate, Community and Biodiversity Standards 2011, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London, UK.
87. Wyatt S., Fortier J.-F., Martineau-Delisle C. First Nations' involvement in forest governance in Québec: The place for distinct consultation processes. The Forestry Chronicle 2010, 86:730-741.