Implementing REDD+: Lessons from analysis of forest governance

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 111-117

  Kanowski, Peter J ^a   McDermott, Constance L ^b   Cashore, Benjamin W ^c  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c Yale School of the Environment   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Copenhagen Accord; Deforestation; Forest degradation; Forest governance; REDD+

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; DEFORESTATION; FOREST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 79952627291     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Agrawal A., Angelsen A. Using community forest management to achieve REDD+ goals. Realising REDD+ 2009, 201-212. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
2. Agrawal A., Chhatre A., Hardin R. Changing governance of the world's forests. Science 2008, 320:1460-1462.
3. Moving Ahead With REDD 2008, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
4. Realising REDD+ 2009, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
5. Bartley T., Andersson K., Jagger P., Van Laerhoven F. The contribution of institutional theories to explaining decentralization of natural resource governance. Society and Natural Resources 2008, 21:160-174.
6. Biermann F. Beyond the intergovernmental regime: recent trends in global carbon governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2010, 2:284-288.
7. Biermann F., Pattberg P., Van Asselt H., Zell F. The fragmentation of global governance architectures: a framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics 2009, 9:14-40.
8. Brown D., Bird N. The REDD Road to Copenhagen: Readiness for What? Opinion 118 2008, Overseas Development Institute, London.
9. Brown D., Seymour F., Peskett L. How do we achieve REDD co-benefits and avoid doing harm?. Moving Ahead With REDD 2008, 107-118. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
10. Burris S., Drahos P., Shearing C. Nodal governance. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 2005, 30:30-58.
11. Busch J., Godoy F., Turner W.R., Harvey C.A. Biodiversity co-benefits of reducing emissions from deforestation under alternative reference levels and levels of finance. Conservation Letters 2010, doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00150.x.
12. Campbell B. Beyond Copenhagen: REDD+, agriculture, adaptation strategies and poverty. Global Environmental Change 2009, 19:397-399.
13. Cashore, B., 2009. Key Components of Good Forest Governance. ASEAN Forests Clearing House Mechanism, ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta. (accessed 10 November 2010). http://www.aseanforest-chm.org/.
14. Cashore B., Gale F., Meidinger E., Newsom D. Conclusion. Confronting Sustainability: Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning Countries 2006, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven. B. Cashore, F. Gale, E. Meidinger, D. Newsom (Eds.).
15. Cerbu G., Swallow B.M., Thompson D.Y. Locating REDD: a global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:168-180.
16. Contreras-Hermosilla A., Gregersen H.A., White A. Forest Governance in Countries with Federal Systems of Government 2008, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor.
17. Corbera E., Estrada M., Brown K. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries: revisiting the assumptions. Climatic Change 2010, 100:355-388.
18. Dimitrov R.S. Hostage to norms: institutions and global forest politics. Global Environmental Policy 2005, 5(4):1-24.
19. Esty D. Good governance at the supranational scale: globalizing administrative law. Yale Law Journal 2006, 115:1490-1562.
20. FCPF (Forest Carbon Partnership Facility), 2010. Harvesting Knowledge on REDD+: Early Lessons from the FCPF Initiative and Beyond. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, Washington. (accessed 5 November 2010). http://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/fcp/sites/forestcarbonpartnership.org/files/Documents/PDF/Oct2010/PA3%202b%20FCPF%20Harvesting%20Knowledge%2010-30-10.pdf.
21. FIELD (Foundation for International Environmental Law and Development), 2010. The Interim REDD+ Partnership - Briefing Note - October 2010. Foundation for International Environmental Law and Development, London. (accessed 5 November 2010). http://www.field.org.uk/focus-areas/meas/climate-change/redd-plus.
22. Finnemore M., Sikkink K. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 1998, 52:887-917.
23. Forsyth T. Multilevel, multiactor governance in REDD+: participation, integration and coordination. Realising REDD+ 2009, 113-122. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
24. Gale F. Tasmania's Tamar Valley pulp mill: a comparison of planning processes using a good environmental governance framework. Australian Journal of Public Administration 2007, 67:261-282.
25. Glück P., Rayner J., Cashore B. Changes in the governance of forest resources. Forests in the global balance - changing paradigms. IUFRO World Series 17 2005, 39-74. IUFRO, Vienna, (Chapter 4). G. Mary, R. Alfaro, M. Kanninen, M. Lobovikov (Eds.).
26. Government of Norway, 2010. Norway and Indonesia in Partnership to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation. Office of the Prime Minister, Press Release 66/10. (accessed 5 November 2010). http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/smk/press-center/Press-releases/2010/Norway-and-Indonesia-in-partnership-to-reduce-emissions-from-deforestation.html?id=605709.
27. Gullison R.E., Frumhoff P.C., Canadell J.G., Field C.B., Nepstad D.C., Hayhoe K., Avissar R., Curran L.M., Friedlingstein P., Jones C.D. Tropical forests and climate policy. Science 2007, 316:985-986.
28. Gunningham N. Environment law, regulation and governance: shifting architectures. Journal of Environmental Law 2009, 21:179-212.
29. Hansen C.P., Lund J.F., Treue T. Neither fast, nor easy: the prospect of Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) in Ghana. International Forestry Review 2009, 11:439-455.
30. Howlett M., Cashore B. Re-visiting the new orthodoxy of policy dynamics: the dependent variable and re-aggregation problems in the study of policy change. Canadian Political Science Review 2007, 1:1-14.
31. Humphreys D. Logjam 2006, Earthscan, London.
32. IIPFCC (International Indigenous Peoples' Forum on Climate Change), 2009. Statement on Shared Vision under AWG LCA, Copenhagen, 7 December 2009. (accessed 26 January 2010). http://indigenouspeoplesissues.com/.
33. Ingerson A. U.S. Forest Carbon and Climate Change 2007, The Wilderness Society, Washington, DC.
34. Isenberg J., Potvin C. Financing REDD in developing countries: a supply and demand analysis. Climate Policy 2010, 10:216-231.
35. Kindermann G., Obersteiner M., Sohngen B., Sathaye J., Andrasko K., Rametsteiner E., Schlamadinger B., Wunder S., Beach R. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 2008, 105:10302-10307.
36. Levin K., McDermott C., Cashore B. The climate regime as global forest governance: can reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation REDD pass a 'dual effectiveness' test. International Forestry Review 2008, 10:538-549.
37. Levin K., Cashore B., Koppell J. Can non-state certification systems bolster state-centered efforts to promote sustainable development through the clean development mechanism?. Wake Forest Law Review 2009, 44:777-798.
38. Lubkowski R. What are the costs and potentials of REDD?. Moving Ahead With REDD 2008, 23-30. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
39. McDermott, C.L., O'Carroll, A., Wood, P., 2007. International Forest Policy - The Instruments, Agreements and Processes that Shape it. United Nations Forum on Forests, New York. (accessed 25 April 2010). http://www.un.org/esa/forests.
40. McDermott C.L., Noah E., Cashore B. Differences that 'matter'? A framework for comparing environmental certification standards and government policies. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2008, 10:47-70.
41. McDermott C.L., Cashore B., Kanowski P. Setting the bar: an international comparison of public and private forest policy specifications and implications for explaining policy trends. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 2009, 6:217-237.
42. McDermott C.L., Cashore B., Kanowski P. Global Environmental Forest Policies 2010, Earthscan, London.
43. Mayers, J., Maginnis, S., Arthur, E., 2010. REDD Readiness requires radical reform. TFD Publication 1/2010. The Forests Dialogue, Yale University.(accessed 13 November 2010). http://environment.yale.edu/tfd/dialogues/forests-and-climate/.
44. Miles L., Kapos V. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land use implications. Science 2008, 320:1454-1555.
45. Ostrom E. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 2007, 104:15181-15187.
46. Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 2009, 325:419-422.
47. Pedroni L., Dutschke M., Streck C., Estrada Porrúa M. Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: the nested approach. Climate Policy 2009, 9:207-220.
48. Pfaff A., Sills E.O., Amache G.S., Coren M.J., Lawlor K., Streck C. Policy Impacts on Deforestation: Lessons Learned from Past Experiences to Inform New Initiatives 2010, Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, NI R 10-02.
49. Phelps J., Webb E.L., Agrawal A. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?. Science 2010, 328:312-313.
50. PRP (Prince's Rainforest Project), 2009. An Emergency Package for Tropical Rainforests. Prince's Rainforest Project, London. (accessed 26 January 2010). http://www.rainforestsos.org/.
51. REDD+ Partnership, 2010. About the REDD+ Partnership. (accessed 5 November 2010). http://reddpluspartnership.org/.
52. Sasaki N., Putz F.E. Critical need for new definitions of "forest" and "forest degradation" in global climate change agreements. Conservation Letters 2009, 2:226-232.
53. Schroeder H. Agency in international climate negotiations: the case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2010, 10:317-332.
54. Sikor T., Stahl J., Enters T., Ribot J.C., Singh N., Sunderlin W.D., Wollenberg L. REDD-plus, forest people's rights and nested climate governance. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20:423-425.
55. Seymour F., Angelsen A. Summary and conclusions: REDD wine in old wineskins?. Realising REDD+ 2009, 293-304. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
56. Skutsch M.M., McCall M.K. Reassessing REDD: governance, markets and the hype cycle. Climatic Change 2010, 100:395-402.
57. Soares-Filho B., Moutinho P., Nepstad D., Anderson A., Rodrigues H., Garcia R., Dietzsch L., Merry F., Bowman M., Hissa L., Silvestrini R., Maretti C. Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 2010, 107:10821-10826.
58. Stern N. The challenge of stabilisation. The Economics of Climate Change 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 193-210.
59. Streck C. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: national implementation of REDD schemes. Climatic Change 2010, 100:389-394.
60. Tacconi L. Illegal logging and the future of the forest. Illegal Logging 2007, 275-290. Earthscan, London. L. Tacconi (Ed.).
61. Tacconi L., Downs F., Larmour P. Anti-corruption policies in the forest sector and REDD+. Realising REDD+ 2009, 163-174. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
62. Tavoni M., Sohngen B., Bosetti V. Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate. Energy Policy 2007, 35:5346-5353.
63. UNFCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), 2010a. Methodological guidance for activities relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries. Decision 4/CP.15, (accessed 5 November 2010). http://unfccc.int/documentation/decisions.
64. UNFCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), 2010b. Copenhagen Accord. Decision 2/CP.15, (accessed 5 November 2010). http://unfccc.int/documentation/decisions.
65. UN-REDD, 2009. About UN-REDD. (accessed 5 November 2010). http://www.un-redd.org/.
66. van der Werf G.R., Morton D.C., Defries R.S., Olivier J.G.J., Kasibhatla P.S., Jackson R.B., Collatz G.J., Randerson J.T. CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nature Geoscience 2009, 2:737-738.
67. Venter O., Laurance W.F., Iwamura T., Wilson K.A., Fuller R.A., Possingham H.P. Harnessing carbon payments to protect biodiversity. Science 2009, 326:1368.
68. World Bank Forests Sourcebook 2008, World Bank, Washington, DC.
69. World Resources Institute Governance of Forests Initiative - Indicator Framework (Version 1) 2009, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
70. Wunder S., Engel S., Pagiola S. Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:834-852.