Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: A value function approach

Ecological Economics

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 75-90

  Ananda, Jayanath ^a   Herath, Gamini ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Forest attributes; Regional forest planning; Stakeholder values; Value functions approach

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST RESOURCE; FORESTRY; STAKEHOLDER;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 0038066413     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00004-1     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Arvai, J., Gregory, R., McDaniels, T., 2001. Testing a structured decision approach: value focused thinking for deliberative risk communication. Risk Anal. 21, 1065-1076.
2. Bartlett, T., 1999. Regional Forest Agreements-a policy, legislative planning framework to achieve sustainable forest management in Australia. Environ. Plan. Law J. 16 (4), 328-338.
3. Beinat, 1997. Value Functions for Environmental Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
4. Buchy, M., Hoverman, S., 2000. Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review. For. Policy Econ. 1, 15-25.
5. Buchy, M., Hoverman, S., Averill, C., 1999. Understanding public participation in forest planning in Australia: how can we learn from each other? ANU Forestry Occasional Paper 99.2, Australian National University, Canberra.
6. Coakes, S., 1998. Valuing the social dimension. Social assessment in the regional forest agreement process. Aust. J. Environ. Econ. 5, 47-53.
7. Commonwealth of Australia, 1998a. North East Victoria Comprehensive Regional Assessment. Joint Commonwealth and Victorian Regional Forest Agreement Steering Committee, Canberra.
8. Commonwealth of Australia, 1998b. Social Assessment-North East Victoria Comprehensive Regional Assessment. Joint Commonwealth and Victorian Regional Forest Agreement Steering Committee, Canberra.
9. Curtain, R., 2000. Good public policy-making: how Australia fares. Agenda 8 (1), 33-46.
10. Dargavel, J., 1998. Politics, policy and processes in the forests. Aust. J. Environ. Manage. 5 (1), 25-30.
11. Dargavel, J., Proctor, W., Kanowski, P., 2000. Conflict and agreement in Australian forests. In: Tacconi, L. (Ed.), Biodiversity and Ecological Economics: Participation, Values and Resource Management. Earthscan Publications, London, pp. 101-115.
12. Doyle, T., 1999. Green politics in grey times: the dynamics of political resilience. In: C. Star (Ed.), Ecopolitics XI Conference Proceedings, Melbourne.
13. Forsyth, J., 1998. Anarchy in the forests: a plethora of rules and absence of enforceability. Environ. Plan. Law J. 15 (5), 338-349.
14. Germain, R.H., Floyd, D.W., Stehman, S.V., 2001. Public perceptions of the USDA forest service public participation process. For. Policy Econ. 3, 113-124.
15. Gregory, R.S., 2000. Valuing environmental options: a case study comparison of multi-attribute and contingent valuation survey methods. Land Econ. 76 (2), 151-173.
16. Gregory, R., 2002. Incorporating value trade-offs into community-based environmental risk decisions. Environ. Values 11, 461-488.
17. Gregory, R., Wellman, K., 2001. Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: a community-based estuary case study. Ecol. Econ. 39, 37-52.
18. Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., 1993. Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. J. Risk Uncertainty 7, 177-197.
19. Grimble, R., Wellard, K., 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agric. Syst. 55 (2), 173-193.
20. Hair, J.F., Bush, R.P., Ortinau, D.J., 2000. Marketing Research: A Practical Approach for the New Millennium. McGraw-Hill Publications, Boston, pp. 356-357.
21. Harrison, S.R., Qureshi, M.E., 2000. Choice of stakeholder groups in multicriteria decision models. Nat. Resour. Forum 24, 1-19.
22. Kanowski, P.J., 1997. Regional forest agreements and future forest management. Proceedings of Outlook 97 Conference. ABARE, Canberra, pp. 225-235.
23. Keeney, R.L., 1992. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
24. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Wiley, New York.
25. Keeney, R.L., von Winterfeldt, D., Eppel, T., 1990. Eliciting public values for complex policy decisions. Manage. Sci. 36 (9), 1011-1030.
26. Kellow, A., 1989. The dispute over the Franklin River and South West wilderness area in Tasmania. Nat. Resour. J. 29, 129-146.
27. Kerley, B., Starr, G., 2000. Public consultation: adding value or impeding policy? Agenda 7 (2), 185-192.
28. Kirkpatrick, J.B., 1998. Nature conservation and the regional forest agreement process. Aust. J. Environ. Manage. 5, 31-37.
29. Knopp, T.B., Caldbeck, E.S., 1990. The role of participatory democracy in forest management. J. For. 88, 13-18.
30. Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., Kajanus, M., 2000. Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis-a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. For. Policy Econ. 1, 41-52.
31. Kwak, S., Yoo, S., Kim, T., 2001. A constructive approach to air-quality valuation in Korea. Ecol. Econ. 38, 327-344.
32. Lane, M.B., 1999. Regional Forestry Agreements: resolving resource conflicts or managing resource politics. Aust. Geogr. Stud. 37 (2), 142.
33. Martin, W.E., Bender, H.W., Shields, D.J., 2000. Stakeholder objectives for public lands: ranking of forest management alternatives. J. Environ. Manage. 58, 21-32.
34. McDaniels, T., Roessler, C., 1998. Multiattribute elicitation of wilderness preservation benefits: a constructive approach. Ecol. Econ. 27, 299-312.
35. McKercher, B., 1998. The politics of tourism and conservation organizations: the case of the Victorian National Parks Association 1952-1996. Prog. Tour. Hosp. Res. 4, 141-157.
36. Russell, C., Dale, V., Lee, J., Jensen, M.H., Kane, M., Gregory, R., 2001. Experimenting with multi-attribute utility survey methods in a multi-dimensional valuation problem. Ecol. Econ. 36, 87-108.
37. Satterfield, T., Slovic, P., Gregory, R., 2000. Narrative valuation in a policy context. Ecol. Econ. 34, 315-331.
38. Sherwin, C., 2000. Queensland's new law of the land: good, bad and ugly. Habitat. Aust. 28, 8.
39. Shindler, B., List, B., Steel, B., 1993. Managing federal forests: public attitudes in Oregon and nationwide. J. For. 91 (7), 36-42.
40. Steelman, T.A., Ascher, W., 1997. Public involvement methods in natural resource policy-making: advantages, disadvantages and trade-offs. Policy Sci. 30, 71-90.
41. Tanz, J.S., Howard, A.F., 1991. Meaningful public participation in the planning and management of publicly owned forests. Forest. Chron. 67 (2), 125-130.
42. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453-458.
43. von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W., 1986. Decision Analysis and Behavioural Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
44. Woodgate, P., Peel, W., Ritman, K., Coram, J., Brady, A., Rule, A., Banks, J., 1994. A Study of the Old-Growth Forests in North East Gippsland. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Victoria.