First nations' involvement in forest governance in Québec: The place for distinct consultation processes

Forestry Chronicle

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 730-741

  Wyatt, Stephen ^a   Fortier, Jean François ^b   Martineau Delisle, Catherine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONCTON   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aboriginal forestry; Aboriginal peoples; Canada; Duty to consult; Forest management; Public participation mechanisms

Indexed keywords

TIMBER;

ABORIGINAL PEOPLES; CANADA; CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT; CONSULTATION PROCESS; DUTY TO CONSULT; FIRST NATIONS; FOREST GOVERNANCE; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER;

CANADA; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; FORESTS;

CANADA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 78650197058     PISSN: 00157546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5558/tfc86730-6     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adam, M.C. and D. Kneeshaw. 2008. Local level criteria and indicator frameworks: A tool used to assess aboriginal forest ecosystem values. Forest Ecology and Management 255(7): 2024-2037.
2. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. American Institute of Planning Journal 35(2): 216-224.
3. Asch, M. and N. Zlotkin. 1997. Affirming Aboriginal titles: A new basis for comprehensive claims negotiations. In M. Asch (ed.). Aboriginal and treaty rights in Canada: Essays on law, equity, and respect for difference. pp. 208-229. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC.
4. Beierle, T. and J. Cayford. 2002.Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. 149 p.
5. Berkes, F., P. George and R.J. Preston. 1991. Co-management: The Evolution in Theory and Practice of the Joint Administration of Living Resources. Alternatives 18(2): 12-18.
6. Boon, T.E. and H. Meilby. 2000. Enhancing public participation in state forest management: a user council survey. Forestry 73: 155-164.
7. Buchy, M. and S. Hoverman. 2000. Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review. Forest Policy and Economics 1: 15-25.
8. [CSA] Canadian Standards Association. 2002. CSA Standard Z809-02, Sustainable forest management: Requirements and guidance. Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON. 78 p. Available at http://www.csa-international. org/product-areas/forest-products-marking/program-documents/CAN-CSA-Z809- 02O-English.pdf [Accessed 25 August 2010].
9. Collier, R., B. Parfitt and D. Woollard. 2002. A Voice on the land: An Indigenous Peoples' Guide to Forest Certification in Canada. National Aboriginal Forestry Association and Ecotrust Canada, Ottawa and Vancouver, Canada. 106 p.
10. Côté, M.-A. and L. Bouthillier. 2002. Assessing the effect of public involvement processes in forest management in Quebec. Forest Policy and Economics 4: 213-225.
11. Feit, H.A. and R. Beaulieu. 2001.Voices from a disappearing forest: Government, corporate and Cree participatory forestry management practices. In C.H. Scott (ed.). Aboriginal Autonomy and development in northern Québec and Labrador. pp. 119-148. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC.
12. [FSC] Forest Stewardship Council. 2004. National Boreal Standard. Available at http://www.fsccanada.org/docs/39146450 F65AB88C.pdf [accessed 24 August 2009].
13. Fortier, J.-F. 2007. Premières Nations, mécanismes de participation et gestion des forêts : Étude comparative des méthodes, des discours et des pratiques, Mémoire de maîtrise, Département de sociologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC. 159 p.
14. Fortier, J.-F. 2009. Aboriginal opinions about the consultation processes in forest management in Québec. Sustainable Forest Management Network. Research Notes Series. Edmonton, AB. 6 p.
15. Gélinas, C. 2000. La gestion de l'étranger: Les Atikamekw et la présence eurocanadienne en Haute-Mauricie 1760-1870. Septentrion, Québec, QC. 378 p.
16. Gouv. du Québec. 2002. Entente concernant une nouvelle relation entre le Gouvernement du Québec et les Cris du Québec. Available at http://www.autochtones.gouv.qc.ca/relations-autochtones/ententes/ cris/entente-cris-20020207.pdf [Accessed 17 September 2009].
17. House, R.D. 1998.Aboriginal claims and the forest industry: Claims processes and recent developments in the courts. The Forestry Chronicle 74(3): 334-342.
18. [INAC] Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. 2008. Treaties with Aboriginal people in Canada. Available at http://www.aincinac. gc.ca/al/ldc/ccl/tra-eng. asp [Accessed 17 September 2009].
19. Konisky, D.M. and T.C. Beierle. 2001. Innovations in Public Participation and Environmental Decision Making: Examples from the Great Lakes Region. Society & Natural Resources 14(9): 815-826.
20. LaRusic, I.E. 1995. Managing Mishtuk: The experience of Waswanipi band in developing and managing a forestry company. In P.D. Elias (ed.). Northern Aboriginal Communities: Economics and Development. pp. 53-87. Captus Press, North York, ON.
21. Lecomte, N., C. Martineau-Delisle and S. Nadeau. 2005. Participatory requirements in forest management planning in Eastern Canada: A temporal and interprovincial perspective. The Forestry Chronicle 81(3): 398-402.
22. Mamuitun Nutashkuan mak Tribal Council. 2004. Mémoire du conseil tribal Mamuitun mak Nutashkuan, Présenté à la commission d'étude sur la gestion de la forêt publique québé coise, 14 juin 2004. Available at http://www.commission-foret.qc.ca/memoires/ doc- 209-09-Mamuitun.pdf [Accessed 17 September 2009].
23. Martineau-Delisle, C. 2009. Les acteurs de la participation publique à la gestion des forêts : Pluralisme sélectif ou universel? In 77e Congrès de l'Acfas, Ottawa.
24. Martineau-Delisle, C. [In prep]. Un changement de gouvernance en forêt? La participation publique à la gestion forestière québécoise : évolution, impacts et participants. Thèse de doctorat. Faculté des sciences sociales, Université Laval, Québec, QC.
25. Martineau-Delisle, C. and S. Nadeau. 2010.Assessing the Effects of Public Participation Processes from the Point of View of Participants: Significance, Achievements, and Challenges. The Forestry Chronicle 86(6): 753-765.
26. McGregor, D. 2006. La participation autochtone à l'aménagement durable des forêts en Ontario: des avancées vers la coopération. Recherches amérindiennes au Québec 36(2-3): 61-70.
27. McNeill, K. 1997. The meaning of Aboriginal title. InM. Asch (ed.). Aboriginal treaty rights in Canada: Essays on law, equity, and respect for difference. pp. 135-154. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC.
28. Molnar, A. 2003. Forest Certification and Communities: Looking forward to the Next Decade. Forest Trends, Washington, DC. 65 p.
29. Nadasdy, P. 2003. Hunters and Bureaucrats: Power, Knowledge, and Aboriginal-State Relations in the Southwest Yukon. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC. 328 p.
30. Nadeau, S., C. Martineau and J.-F. Fortier. 2004. Enquête sur la participation publique à la gestion des forêts dans certaines régions du Québec. Commission d'étude sur la gestion de la forêt publique québécoise. Rapport de mandat de recherche externe. Québec, QC. 82 p.
31. Natcher, D. 2001. Land use research and the duty to consult: a misrepresentation of the Aboriginal landscape. Land Use Policy 18(2): 113-122.
32. Natcher, D. and C. Hickey. 2002. Putting the community back into community-based resource management: A criteria and indicators approach to sustainability. Human Organization 61(4): 350-363.
33. Newman, D.G. 2009. The duty to consult: new relationships with Aboriginal peoples. Purich Publishing, Saskatoon, SK. 127 p.
34. Notzke, C. 1994. Aboriginal peoples and natural resources in Canada. Captus Press, North York, ON. 352 p.
35. Pesselac-Ross, M. and V. Potes. 2009. Treaty 8 land-based rights: A legal and ethical analysis. In M. Stevenson and D. Natcher (eds.). Changing the Culture of Forestry in Canada: Engaging Canada's Aboriginal Peoples in Sustainable Forest Management. pp. 181-196. CCI Press, Edmonton, AB.
36. Rodon, T. 2003. En partenariat avec l'État; Les expériences de cogestion des Autochtones du Canada. Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Québec, QC. 320 p.
37. Ross, M.M. and P. Smith 2003. Meaningful Consultation with Indigenous Peoples on Forest Management in Canada. In XII World Forestry Congress, Québec, QC.
38. Rowe, G. and L.J. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values 251: 3-29.
39. Rynard, P. 2001. Ally or colonizer? The federal state, the Cree Nation and the James Bay Agreement. Journal of Canadian Studies - Revue d'études canadiennes 36(2): 8-48.
40. Saint-Arnaud, M., H. Asselin, C. Dubé, Y. Croteau and P. Charlie. 2009. Developing criteria and indicators for Aboriginal forestry: mutual learning through collaborative research. InM. Stevenson and D. Natcher (eds.). Changing the Culture of Forestry in Canada: Engaging Canada's Aboriginal Peoples in Sustainable Forest Management. pp. 85-106. CCI Press, Edmonton, AB.
41. Smith, P. 1996. Aboriginal participation in forest management: Not just another "stakeholder". The Forestry Chronicle 72(1): 2-5.
42. Stevenson, M. and J. Webb. 2003. Just another stakeholder? First Nations and sustainable forest management in Canada' boreal forest. Chapter 3. In P.J. Burton, C. Messier, D.W. Smith and W.L. Adamowicz. Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest. pp. 65-112. NRC Research Press, Ottawa.
43. Tollefson, C., F. Gale and D. Haley. 2007. Setting the Standard: Certification, Governance and the Forest Stewardship Council. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC. 404 p.
44. [WCMF] Waswanipi Cree Model Forest. 2007. Ndoho Istchee: An innovative approach to aboriginal participation in forest management planning. Waswanipi Cree Model Forest, Waswanipi, Québec. 141 p.
45. Wellstead, A.M., R.C. Stedman and J.R. Parkins. 2003. Understanding the concept of representation within the context of local forest management decision making. Forest Policy and Economics 5(1): 1-11.
46. Wyatt, S. 2004. Co-existence of Atikamekw and industrial forestry paradigms: Occupation and management of forestlands in the St- Maurice river basin, Québec. PhD thesis. Université Laval. Université Laval, Québec, QC. 376 p + xiv.
47. Wyatt, S. 2006. « Si les autres le font, pourquoi pas nous? » La quête des Atikamekw de Wemotaci pour un rôle dans la foresterie au Nitaskinan. Recherches amérindiennes de Québec 36(2-3): 9-18.
48. Wyatt, S., J.-F. Fortier, G. Greskiw, M. Hébert, D. Natcher, S. Nadeau, P. Smith and R. Trosper. 2010a. Collaboration between Aboriginal peoples and the Canadian forestry industry: a dynamic relationship. A State of Knowledge report. Sustainable Forest Management Network. Edmonton, AB.
49. Wyatt, S., J.-F. Fortier and M. Hebert. 2010b. Collaboration entre Autochtones et autres acteurs forestiers du Québec : portrait d'une diversité de pratiques et de modèles. The Forestry Chronicle 86(2): 243-255.