Platform support for pedagogical scenarios

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 122-137

  Peter, Yvan ^a   Vantroys, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

Pedagogical scenario; Scenario execution; Unit of study engineering; Workflow engine

Indexed keywords

EID: 23944447434     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Caeiro, M., Anido, L., & Llamas, M. (2003). A Critical Analysis of IMS Learning Design. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 363-367.
2. Cesarini, M., Monga, M., & Tedesco, R. (2004). Carrying on the elearning process with a workflow management engine. In H. Haddad, A. Omicini, R. L. Wainwright, & L. M. Liebrock (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), New York: ACM, 940-945.
3. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.). Three worlds of CSCL Can we support CSCL, Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland, 61-91.
4. Eales, R. T. J., Hall, T., & Bannon, L. J. (2002). The Motivation is the Message: Comparing CSCL in different Settings. In: G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 310-317.
5. Eberhart, A., & Fischer, S. (2002). Java Tools: Using XML, EJB, CORBA, Servlets and SOAP, New York: Wiley.
6. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design Patterns: Elements of reusable Object-Oriented Software, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, June 7-10, 2004, Cavtat, Croatia.
8. Hollingsworth, D. (1995). The Workflow Reference Model - version 1.1, retrieved July 25, 2005, from http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/tc003v11.pdf.
9. Hummel, H., Manderveld, J., Tattersall, C., & Koper, R. (2004). Educational modelling language and learning design: new opportunities for instructional reusability and personalised learning. International Journal on Learning Technology, 1 (1), 111-126.
10. IMS (2003). IMS Learning Design Information Model - version 1.0, retrieved July 25, 2005, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.html.
11. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., & Rumbaugh, J. (1999). The Unified Software Development Process, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Kiczales, G., des Rivières, G., J., & BoBrow, D. G. (1991), The Art of the Metaobject Protocol, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Lin, J., Ho, C., Sadiq, W., & Orlowska, M. E. (2001). On Workflow Enabled e-Learning Services. In T. Okamoto, R. Hartley, Kinshuk, & J. P. Klus (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies: Issues, Achievements and Challenges, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 349-352.
14. Matena, V., & Stearns, B. (2001). Applying Enterprise JavaBeans: Component-Based Development for the J2EE platform, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. OMG (2000). Workflow Management Facility - Version 1.2, retrieved July 25, 2005, from http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/00-05-02.pdf.
16. Schmidt-Wesche, B. (2003). IBM WebSphere Platform User Roles, retrieved July 25, 2005, from http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/ 0303_-schmidt/schmidt.html.
17. Thatte, S. (2001). XLANG - Web Services for Business Process Design, retrieved July 25, 2005, from http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/xml_wsspecs/xlang-c/default.htm.
18. Vantroys, T., & Peter, Y. (2003). COW, a Flexible Platform for the Enactment of Learning Scenarios. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2806, 168-182.
19. WFMC (2002). Workflow Process Definition Interface - XML Process Definition Language - version 1.0, retrieved July 25, 2005, from http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/TC-1025_10_xpdl_102502.pdf.