Perceptual sequence learning is more severely impaired than motor sequence learning in patients with chronic cerebellar stroke

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 2207-2215

  Dirnberger, Georg ^a   Novak, Judith ^a   Nasel, Christian ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBELLUM; CEREBELLUM INJURY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; LEARNING; MALE; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESSING; REACTION TIME; SELF COMPATIBILITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADULT; AGED; CEREBELLUM; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84886665286     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00444     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abrahamse, E., Jimenez, L., Verwey, W., & Clegg, B. (2010). Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 603-623.
2. Abrahamse, E., Lubbe, R., & Verwey, W. (2009). Sensory information in perceptual-motor sequence learning: Visual and/or tactile stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 197, 175-183.
3. Bapi, R., Doya, K., & Harner, A. (2000). Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 132, 149-162.
4. Beck, A., Ward, C., Mendleson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. 1961. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychology, 4, 561-571.
5. Bischoff-Grethe, A., Goedert, K., Willingham, D., & Grafton, S. 2004. Neural substrates of response-based sequence learning using fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 127-138.
6. Clegg, B. A. (2005). Stimulus-specific sequence representation in serial reaction time tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1087-1101.
7. Dennis, N., Howard, J., & Howard, D. (2006). Implicit sequence learning without motor sequencing in young and old adults. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 153-164.
8. Deroost, N., & Soetens, E. (2006). Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures. Psychological Research, 70, 88-102.
9. Diedrichsen, J., Verstynen, T., Lehman, S., & Ivry, R. B. (2005). Cerebellar involvement in anticipating the consequences of self-produced actions during bimanual movement. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 801-812.
10. Dirnberger, G., Novak, J., Nasel, C., & Zehnter, M. (2010). Separating coordinative and executive dysfunction in cerebellar patients during motor skill acquisition. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1200-1208.
11. Dirnberger, G., & Novak-Knollmueller, J. (2013). Motor and perceptual sequence learning: Different time course of parallel processes. NeuroReport, 24, 578-583.
12. Doyon, J., Gaudreau, D., Laforce, R., Castonguay, M., Bedard, P., Bedard, F., et al. (1997). Role of the striatum, cerebellum, and frontal lobes in the learning of a visuomotor sequence. Brain and Cognition, 34, 218-245.
13. Folstein, M., Folstein, S., & McHugh, P. (1975). "Mini-mental state": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 12, 189-198.
14. Franz, E., Ivry, R., & Helmuth, L. (1996). Reduced timing variability in patients with unilateral cerebellar lesions during bimanual movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 107-118.
15. Gheysen, F., Gevers, W., Schutter, E., van Waelvelde, H., & Fias, W. (2009). Disentangling perceptual from motor implicit sequence learning with a serial color-matching task. Experimental Brain Research, 197, 163-174.
16. Gómez-Beldarrain, M., García-Moncó, J., Rubio, B., & Pascual-Leone, A. (1998). Effect of focal cerebellar lesions on procedural learning in the serial reaction time task. Experimental Brain Research, 120, 25-30.
17. Goschke, T., Friederici, A., Kotz, S., & van Kampen, A. 2001. Procedural learning in Broca's aphasia: Dissociation between the implicit acquisition of spatio-motor and phoneme sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 370-388.
18. Howard, J., Mutter, S., & Howard, D. (1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 18, 1029-1039.
19. Ingram, J., & Wolpert, D. (2011). Naturalistic approaches to sensorimotor control. Progress in Brain Research, 191, 3-29.
20. Keele, S., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. 1995. On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 17-30.
21. Kelly, S., & Burton, A. (2001). Learning complex sequences: No role for observation? Psychological Research, 65, 15-23.
22. Kirsch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2012). Stimulus-dependent modulation of perceptual and motor learning in a serial reaction time task. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8, 155-164.
23. Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research, 63, 22-35.
24. Kovacs, A., Han, D., & Shea, C. (2009). The representation of movement sequences is related to task characteristics. Acta Psychologica, 132, 54-56.
25. Leggio, M., Tedesco, A., Chiricozzi, F., Clausi, S., Orsini, A., & Molinari, M. (2008). Cognitive sequencing impairment in patients with focal or atrophic cerebellar damage. Brain, 131, 1332-1343.
26. Miyake, A., Friedman, N., Emerson, M., Witzki, A., & Howerter, A. 2000. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
27. Molinari, M., Leggio, M., Solida, A., Corra, R., Misciagna, S., Silveri, M., et al. (1997). Cerebellum and procedural learning: Evidence from focal cerebellar lesions. Brain, 120, 1753-1762.
28. Nissen, M., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements for learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
29. Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Clark, K., Stewart, B., Massaquoi, S., Lou, J., et al. (1993). Procedural learning in Parkinson's disease and cerebellar degeneration. Annals of Neurology, 34, 594-602.
30. Ramnani, N. (2006). The primate cortico-cerebellar system: Anatomy and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 511-522.
31. Raven, J. C., Court, J., & Raven, J. (1996). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Mill Hill Vocabulary Scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
32. Restuccia, D., Della Marca, G., Valeriani, M., Leggio, M., & Molinari, M. (2007). Cerebellar damage impairs detection of somatosensory input changes. A somatosensory mismatch-negativity study. Brain, 130, 276-287.
33. Robertson, E., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2001). Aspects of sensory guidance in sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 336-345.
34. Schmahmann, J., & Pandya, D. (1997). The cerebrocerebellar system. International Review of Neurobiology, 41, 31-60.
35. Schmidt, K., & Metzler, P. (1992). Wortschatztest. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Test GmbH.
36. Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. (2010). Implicit sequence learning is represented by stimulus-response rules. Memory and Cognition, 38, 677-688.
37. Shin, J., & Ivry, R. (2003). Spatial and temporal sequence learning in patients with Parkinson's disease or cerebellar lesions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1232-1243.
38. Smith, M., & Shadmehr, R. (2005). Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 2809-2821.
39. Spencer, R. M., & Ivry, R. B. (2008). Sequence learning is preserved in individuals with cerebellar degeneration when the movements are directly cued. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1302-1310.
40. Timmann, D., Drepper, J., Calabrese, S., Burgerhoff, K., Maschke, M., Kolb, F., et al. (2004). Use of sequence information in associative learning in control subjects and cerebellar patients. Cerebellum, 3, 1-8.
41. Tucker, J., Harding, A., Jahanshahi, M., Nixon, P., Rushworth, M., Quinn, N., et al. (1996). Associative learning in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 1229-1234.
42. Wechsler, D., & Stone, C. (1987). Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
43. Willingham, D., Wells, L., Farrell, J., & Stemwedel, M. 2000. Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Memory and Cognition, 28, 366-375.
44. Witt, K., Nuhsman, A., & Deuschl, G. (2002). Dissociation of habit-learning in Parkinson's and cerebellar disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 493-499.
45. Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 24, 962-978.