When face-to-face fails: Opportunities for social media to foster collaborative learning

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 113-120

  Clegg, Tamara ^a   Yip, Jason C ^a   Ahn, June ^a   Bonsignore, Elizabeth ^a   Gubbels, Michael ^a   Lewittes, Becky ^a   Rhodes, Emily ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE INTERACTION; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; INFORMAL SCIENCE; INTEGRAL COMPONENTS; LEARNING COMMUNITY; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SOCIAL MEDIA;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 84886551309     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Ahn, J., Gubbels, M., Kim, J., & Wu, J. (2012). SINQ: Scientific INQuiry learning using social media. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12), Austin, TX (pp. 2081-2086). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
2. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359.
3. Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 37-40.
4. Clegg, T., & Kolodner, J. (2013). The role of life-relevant learning environments in helping middle-school learners develop more scientific dispositions. Manuscript submitted for publication. Copy on file with authors.
5. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
6. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, E. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1130-1161.
7. Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschnker, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 139-154.
8. Kreijns, K., and Kirschner., P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353.
9. Linn, M.C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J.D. (2002) WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87(4), 517-538.
10. Morris, M., Ryall, K., Shen, C., Forlines, C., & Vernier, F. (2004). Beyond "social protocols,": multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '04), Chicago, IL (pp. 262-265),. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
11. O'Reilly, T. (2007). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, 65, 17-37.
12. Puntambekar, S. (2006). Analyzing collaborative interactions: divergence, shared understanding and construction of knowledge. Computers & Education, 47(3), 332-351.
13. Rick, J., & Guzdial, M. (2006). Situating CoWeb: a scholarship of application. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 89-115.
14. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO
15. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (eds.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249-268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
16. Shirky, C. (2011). Cognitive surplus: How technology makes consumers into collaborators. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
17. Stahl, G. (2006). Sustaining group cognition in a math chat environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 01(02), 85-113.
18. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Applied social research methods series (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAG.