SINQ: Scientific INQuiry Learning Using Social Media

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 2012-January, Issue , 2012, Pages 2081-2086

  Ahn, June ^a   Gubbels, Michael ^b   Kim, Jinyoung ^a   Wu, Johnny ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b Institute of Advanced Computer Science   (United States)

Author keywords

informal learning; scaffolding; science learning; scientific inquiry; social media

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

GUIDE LEARNERS; INFORMAL LEARNING; INQUIRY LEARNING; SCAFFOLDING; SCIENCE LEARNING; SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; WEB APPLICATION; WEB APPLICATIONS;

SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 85139507375     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2212776.2223756     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Bell, P., Davis, E. A. Designing Mildred: Scaffolding students' reflection and argumentation using a cognitive software guide. In Proc. of the International Conference for the Learning Sciences, (2000), 142-149.
2. Cahill, C., Khun, A., Schmoll, S., Pompe, A., Quintana, C. Zydeco: Using mobile and web technologies to support seamless inquiry between museum and school contexts. In Proc. of Interaction Design and Children, (2010), 174-177.
3. Clegg, T., Gardner, C. M., & Kolodner, J. L. Playing with food: Moving from interests and goals to scientifically meaningful experiences. In Proc. of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, (2010), 1135-1142.
4. Druin, A. Cooperative inquiry: Developing new technologies for children with children. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 592-599.
5. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, E. Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 4 (2009), 1130-1161.
6. Guzdial, M. Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning. Interactive Learning Environments 4, (1994), 1-44.
7. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41, 2 (2006), 75-86.
8. National Research Council. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. The National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
9. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. The National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
10. Nielsen, W. S., Nashon, S., Anderson, D. Metacognitive engagement during field-trip experiences: A case study of students in an amusement park physics program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46, 3 (2009), 265-288.
11. Preece, J., & Shneiderman, B. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1, 1 (2009), 13-32.
12. Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Golan, R., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., Soloway, E. A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13, 3 (2004), 337-386.
13. Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 19.