Some unfortunate consequences of non-randomized, grouped-item survey administration in IS research

International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2012

Volumn 3, Issue , 2012, Pages 2244-2259

  Vance Wilson, E ^a   Lankton, Nancy K ^b  

^a WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MARSHALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Context effects; Item ordering; Survey administration; Temporal effects

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT EFFECTS; CONTINUED USE; IS RESEARCHES; ITEM-ORDERING; NEW APPROACHES; ONLINE SURVEYS; STATISTICAL RELIABILITY; TEMPORAL EFFECTS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RELIABILITY; RESEARCH;

SURVEYS;

EID: 84886528979     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. 1997, "The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies, " Decision Sciences, (28:3), pp. 557-582.
2. Bickart, B. A. 1993. "Carryover and Backfire Effects in Marketing Research, " Journal of Marketing Research (30:1), pp. 52-62.
3. Bradley, M and Daly, A. 1994. "Use of the Logit Scaling Approach to Test for Rank-Order and Fatigue Effects in Stated Preference Data, Transportation (21: 2), pp. 167-184.
4. Bradlow, E. T., and Fitzsimons, G. J. 2001. "Distance and Item Clustering Effects in Self-Administered Surveys: A New Metric, " Journal of Marketing Research (38:2), pp. 254-261.
5. Budd, R. J. 1987. "Response Bias and the Theory of Reasoned Action, " Social Cognition (5), pp. 95-107.
6. Caussade, S., Ortúzar, J. D., Rizzi, L. I., and Hensher, D. A. 2005. "Assessing the Influence of Design Dimensions on Stated Choice Experiment Estimates, " Transportation Research Part B (39), pp. 621-640.
7. Davis, F. D. 1989. "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, " MIS Quarterly (13:3), pp. 319-340.
8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. 1992. "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace, " Journal of Applied Social Psychology (22), pp. 1111-32.
9. Davis, F. D., and Venkatesh, V. 1996. "A Critical Assessment of Potential Measurement Biases in the Technology Acceptance Model: Three Experiments, " International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (45), pp. 19-45.
10. Fan, W., and Yan, Z. 2010. "Factors Affecting Response Rates of the Web Survey: A Systematic Review, " Computers in Human Behavior (26), 132-139.
11. George, D., and Mallery, P. 2003. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Goodhue, D. L. 1998. "Development and Measurement Validity of a Text-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Information Systems. Decision Sciences (29:1, pp. 105-138.
13. thHawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
14. Herche, J., and Engelland, B. 1996. "Reversed-polarity Items and Scale Unidimensionality, " Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (24), pp. 366-374.
15. Hess, S., Hensher, D. A., and Daly, A. 2012. "Not Bored Yet: Revisiting Respondent Fatigue in Stated Choice Experiments, " Transportation Research Part A (46), pp. 626-644.
16. Hyman, H. H., and Sheatsley, P. B. 1950. The Current Status of American Public Opinion, Washington, D.C.: National Council for the Social Sciences.
17. Lasorsa, D. L. 2003. "Question-Order Effects in Surveys: The Case of Political Interest, News Attention, and Knowledge, " Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly (80), pp. 599-512.
18. MacFarland, L. A., Ryan, A. M., and Ellis, A., 2002. "Item Placement on a Personality Measure: Effects of Faking Behavior and Test Measurement Properties, " Psychological Methods (10:1), pp. 348-369.
19. Meeker, W. Q. and Escobar, L. A. 1998. Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
20. Mirowsky, J., and Ross, C. E. 1991. "Eliminating Defense and Agreement Bias From Measures of the Sense of Control: A 2 X 2 Index, " Social Psychology Quarterly (54:2), 127-145.
21. Moore, D. W. 2002. "New Types of Question-Order Effects: Additive and Subtractive, " The Public Opinion Quarterly (66:1), pp. 80-91.
22. Moore, G. C. and Benbasat, I. 1991, "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation, " Information Systems Research (2:3), 192-222.
23. Pustejovsky, J. E., and Spillane, J. P. 2009. "Question-Order Effects in Social Network Name Generators, " Social Networks, 31, 221-229.
24. Schmitt, N., and Stults, D. M., 1985. "Factors Defined by Negatively Keyed Items: The Result of Careless Respondents?" Applied Psychological Measurement (9), pp. 367-373.
25. Schuman, H., and Presser, S. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Working, and Content. New York: Academic Press.
26. Schumann, H., and Scott, J. 1987. "Problems in the Use of Survey Questions to Measure Public Opinion, " Science (236), pp. 957-959.
27. Stigler, S. M. 1992. "A Historical View of Statistical Concepts in Psychology and Educational Research. " American Journal of Education (101:1), pp. 60-70.
28. Straub, D., Boudreau, M-C., and Gefen, D. 2004. "Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research, " Communications of the Association for Information Systems (13:24).
29. Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., and Schwarz, N. 1996. Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Swain, S. D., Weathers, D., and Niedrich, R. W., 2008. "Assessing Three Sources of Misresponse to Reversed Likert Items. Journal of Marketing Research (45), pp. 116-131
31. Tourangeau, R., and Rasinski, K. A. 1988. "Cognitive "Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement, " Psychological Bulletin (103), pp. 299-314.
32. Tourangeau, R., Rasinski, K. A., Bradburn, N., and D'Andrade R. 1989. "Carryover Effects in Attitude Surveys, " Public Opinion Quarterly (53), pp. 495-524.
33. Tourangeau, R., Rips, J., and Rasinski, K. A., 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, " Management Science (46:2), pp. 186-204.
35. Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M. G. 2000. "Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior, " MIS Quarterly (24:1), pp. 115-139.
36. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. 2003. "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, " MIS Quarterly (27:3), pp. 425-478.
37. Weijters, B., Geuens, M., and Schillewaert, N. 2009. "The Proximity Effect: The Role of Inter-item Distance on Reverse-item bias, " International Journal of Research in Marketing (26), pp. 2-12.
38. Wilson, E. V., and Lankton, N. K. 2004. "Modeling Patients' Acceptance of Provider-Delivered E-Health, " Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (11:4), pp. 241-248.