Osteoinductive biomaterial geometries for bone regenerative engineering

Current Pharmaceutical Design

Volumn 19, Issue 19, 2013, Pages 3446-3455

  Ozdemir, Tugba ^a   Higgins, Andrew M ^a   Brown, Justin L ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomaterials; Osteoinduction; Substrate surface geometries

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN; NANOFIBER; NANOMATERIAL;

BONE DISEASE; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; FRACTURE HEALING; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; ANIMAL; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; FRACTURE; HUMAN; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; METHODOLOGY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE DISEASES; BONE REGENERATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84886443579     PISSN: 13816128     EISSN: 18734286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1381612811319190010     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Anderson DG, Burdick JA, Langer R. Materials science. Smart biomaterials. Science 2004; 305(5692): 1923-4.
2. Deng M, James R, Laurencin CT, Kumbar SG. Nanostructured polymeric scaffolds for orthopaedic regenerative engineering. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 2012; 11(1): 3-14.
3. Place ES, Evans ND, Stevens MM. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 2009; 8(6): 457-70.
4. Jahangir A, Nunley RM, Mehta S, Sharan A. Bone-graft substitutes in orthopedic surgery. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Now 2008.
5. Greenwald AS, Boden SD, Goldberg VM, Khan Y, Laurencin CT, Rosier RN. Bone-graft substitutes: facts, fictions, and applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A Suppl 2 Pt 2: 98-103.
6. Miron RJ, Zhang YF. Osteoinduction: a review of old concepts with new standards. J Dent Res 2012; 91(8): 736-44.
7. Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 1965; 150(3698): 893-9.
8. Hall BK, Miyake T. All for one and one for all: condensations and the initiation of skeletal development. BioEssays 2000; 22(2): 138-47.
9. Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhjan RK, Lalykina KS. The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Tissue Kinet 1970; 3(4): 393-403.
10. Horwitz EM, Le Blanc K, Dominici M, et al. Clarification of the nomenclature for MSC: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2005; 7(5): 393-5.
11. Mendez-Ferrer S, Michurina TV, Ferraro F, et al. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature 2010; 466(7308): 829-34.
12. Heinzel K, Benz C, Bleul CC. A silent chemokine receptor regulates steady-state leukocyte homing in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104(20): 8421-6.
13. Ai-Aql ZS, Alagl AS, Graves DT, Gerstenfeld LC, Einhorn TA. Molecular mechanisms controlling bone formation during fracture healing and distraction osteogenesis. J Dent Res 2008; 87(2): 107-18.
14. Urist MR, Strates BS. Bone morphogenetic protein. J Dent Res 1971; 50(6): 1392-406.
15. Gimble JM, Morgan C, Kelly K, et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins inhibit adipocyte differentiation by bone marrow stromal cells. J Cell Biochem 1995; 58(3): 393-402.
16. Bandyopadhyay A, Tsuji K, Cox K, Harfe BD, Rosen V, Tabin CJ. Genetic analysis of the roles of BMP2, BMP4, and BMP7 in limb patterning and skeletogenesis. PLoS Genet 2006; 2(12): e216.
17. Krishnan V, Ma Y, Moseley J, Geiser A, Friant S, Frolik C. Bone anabolic effects of sonic/indian hedgehog are mediated by bmp-2/4-dependent pathways in the neonatal rat metatarsal model. Endocrinology 2001; 142(2): 940-7.
18. Nakashima K, Zhou X, Kunkel G, et al. The novel zinc fingercontaining transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell 2002; 108(1): 17-29.
19. Chen W, Villa-Diaz LG, Sun Y, et al. Nanotopography influences adhesion, spreading, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. ACS Nano 2012; 6(5): 4094-103.
20. Helvering LM, Sharp RL, Ou X, Geiser AG. Regulation of the promoters for the human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and 4 genes. Gene 2000; 256(1-2): 123-38.
21. Seib FP, Franke M, Jing D, Werner C, Bornhauser M. Endogenous bone morphogenetic proteins in human bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. Eur J Cell Biol 2009; 88(5): 257-71.
22. Urist MR, Mc LF. Osteogenetic potency and new-bone formation by induction in transplants to the anterior chamber of the eye. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1952; 34-A(2): 443-76.
23. Braccini A, Wendt D, Jaquiery C, et al. Three-dimensional perfusion culture of human bone marrow cells and generation of osteoinductive grafts. Stem Cells 2005; 23(8): 1066-72.
24. Begley CT, Doherty MJ, Mollan RA, Wilson DJ. Comparative study of the osteoinductive properties of bioceramic, coral and processed bone graft substitutes. Biomaterials 1995; 16(15): 1181-5.
25. Urist MR, Wallace TH, Adams T. The Function of Fibrocartilaginous Fracture Callus. Observations on Transplants Labelled with Tritiated Thymidine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1965; 47: 304-18.
26. Yuan HP, Fernandes H, Habibovic P, et al. Osteoinductive ceramics as a synthetic alternative to autologous bone grafting. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107(31): 13614-9.
27. Weiss P, Garber B. Shape and Movement of Mesenchyme Cells as Functions of the Physical Structure of the Medium: Contributions to a Quantitative Morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1952; 38(3): 264-80.
28. McNamara LE, McMurray RJ, Biggs MJ, Kantawong F, Oreffo RO, Dalby MJ. Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation. J Tissue Eng 2010; 2010: 120623.
29. Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 2002; 110(6): 673-87.
30. Vogel V, Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7(4): 265-75.
31. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. Taking cellmatrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001; 294(5547): 1708-12.
32. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004; 6(4): 483-95.
33. Tan J, Saltzman WM. Biomaterials with hierarchically defined micro-and nanoscale structure. Biomaterials 2004; 25(17): 3593-601.
34. Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Riveline D, et al. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3(5): 466-72.
35. Gallant ND, Michael KE, Garcia AJ. Cell adhesion strengthening: contributions of adhesive area, integrin binding, and focal adhesion assembly. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16(9): 4329-40.
36. Dalby MJ, Biggs MJ, Gadegaard N, Kalna G, Wilkinson CD, Curtis AS. Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning. J Cell Biochem 2007; 100(2): 326-38.
37. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CD, Oreffo RO, Dalby MJ. The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and ERK/MAPK signalling in STRO-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. Biomaterials 2009; 30(28): 5094-103.
38. Oakley C, Brunette DM. The sequence of alignment of microtubules, focal contacts and actin filaments in fibroblasts spreading on smooth and grooved titanium substrata. J Cell Sci 1993; 106 (Pt 1): 343-54.
39. Dalby MJ. Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. Med Eng Phys 2005; 27(9): 730-42.
40. Dalby MJ, Giannaras D, Riehle MO, Gadegaard N, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. Rapid fibroblast adhesion to 27nm high polymer demixed nano-topography. Biomaterials 2004; 25(1): 77-83.
41. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Sutherland DS, Agheli H, Curtis AS. Fibroblast response to a controlled nanoenvironment produced by colloidal lithography. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 69(2): 314-22.
42. Ingber DE. Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Physiol 1997; 59: 575-99.
43. Ingber DE. Integrins, tensegrity, and mechanotransduction. Gravit Space Biol Bull 1997; 10(2): 49-55.
44. Kim DH, Provenzano PP, Smith CL, Levchenko A. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function. J Cell Biol 2012; 197(3): 351-60.
45. Birk DE, Southern JF, Zycband EI, Fallon JT, Trelstad RL. Collagen fibril bundles: a branching assembly unit in tendon morphogenesis. Development 1989; 107(3): 437-43.
46. Canty EG, Lu Y, Meadows RS, Shaw MK, Holmes DF, Kadler KE. Coalignment of plasma membrane channels and protrusions (fibripositors) specifies the parallelism of tendon. J Cell Biol 2004; 165(4): 553-63.
47. Brandi ML. Microarchitecture, the key to bone quality. Rheumatology (Oxf) 2009; 48 Suppl 4: iv3-8.
48. Moroni A, Caja VL, Egger EL, Trinchese L, Chao EY. Histomorphometry of hydroxyapatite coated and uncoated porous titanium bone implants. Biomaterials 1994; 15(11): 926-30.
49. Johansson CB, Hansson HA, Albrektsson T. Qualitative interfacial study between bone and tantalum, niobium or commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials 1990; 11(4): 277-80.
50. Sheu TJ, Schwarz EM, Martinez DA, et al. A phage display technique identifies a novel regulator of cell differentiation. J Biol Chem 2003; 278(1): 438-43.
51. Boyan BD, Batzer R, Kieswetter K, et al. Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 39(1): 77-85.
52. Jaiswal D, Brown JL. Nanofiber diameter-dependent MAPK activity in osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012 Jun 14.
53. Milner KR, Siedlecki CA. Fibroblast response is enhanced by poly(L-lactic acid) nanotopography edge density and proximity. Int J Nanomedicine 2007; 2(2): 201-11.
54. Lim JY, Hansen JC, Siedlecki CA, Runt J, Donahue HJ. Human foetal osteoblastic cell response to polymer-demixed nanotopographic interfaces. J R Soc Interface 2005; 2(2): 97-108.
55. Lim JY, Dreiss AD, Zhou Z, et al. The regulation of integrinmediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography. Biomaterials 2007; 28(10): 1787-97.
56. Chavez VL, Song L, Barua S, et al. Impact of nanopore morphology on cell viability on mesoporous polymer and carbon surfaces. Acta Biomater 2010; 6(8): 3035-43.
57. Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett 2007; 7(6): 1686-91.
58. Bauer S, Park J, Faltenbacher J, Berger S, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. Size selective behavior of mesenchymal stem cells on ZrO(2) and TiO(2) nanotube arrays. Integr Biol (Camb) 2009; 1(8-9): 525-32.
59. Lamers E, van Horssen R, te Riet J, et al. The influence of nanoscale topographical cues on initial osteoblast morphology and migration. Eur Cell Mater 2010; 20: 329-43.
60. Arnold M, Hirschfeld-Warneken VC, Lohmuller T, et al. Induction of cell polarization and migration by a gradient of nanoscale variations in adhesive ligand spacing. Nano Lett 2008; 8(7): 2063-9.
61. Kim DH, Han K, Gupta K, Kwon KW, Suh KY, Levchenko A. Mechanosensitivity of fibroblast cell shape and movement to anisotropic substratum topography gradients. Biomaterials 2009; 30(29): 5433-44.
62. Ripamonti U. Tissue morphogenesis and tissue engineering by bone morphogenetic proteins. SADJ 1999; 54(6): 257-62.
63. Zimmerberg J, McLaughlin S. Membrane curvature: how BAR domains bend bilayers. Curr Biol 2004; 14(6): R250-2.
64. Brown JL, Peach MS, Nair LS, Kumbar SG, Laurencin CT. Composite scaffolds: bridging nanofiber and microsphere architectures to improve bioactivity of mechanically competent constructs. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 95(4): 1150-8.
65. Schindler M, Ahmed I, Kamal J, et al. A synthetic nanofibrillar matrix promotes in vivo-like organization and morphogenesis for cells in culture. Biomaterials 2005; 26(28): 5624-31.
66. Han D, Gouma PI. Electrospun bioscaffolds that mimic the topology of extracellular matrix. Nanomedicine 2006; 2(1): 37-41.
67. Li WJ, Tuli R, Okafor C, et al. A three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 2005; 26(6): 599-609.
68. Deng M, Kumbar SG, Nair LS, Weikel AL, Allcock HR, Laurencin CT. Biomimetic Structures: Biological Implications of Dipeptide-Substituted Polyphosphazene-Polyester Blend Nanofiber Matrices for Load-Bearing Bone Regeneration. Adv Funct Mater 2011; 21(14): 2641-51.
69. Bjursten LM, Rasmusson L, Oh S, Smith GC, Brammer KS, Jin S. Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 92(3): 1218-24.
70. Das K, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. TiO2 nanotubes on Ti: Influence of nanoscale morphology on bone cell-materials interaction. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 90(1): 225-37.
71. Sitharaman B, Shi X, Walboomers XF, et al. In vivo biocompatibility of ultra-short single-walled carbon nanotube/biodegradable polymer nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering. Bone 2008; 43(2): 362-70.
72. Zanello LP, Zhao B, Hu H, Haddon RC. Bone cell proliferation on carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 2006; 6(3): 562-7.
73. Li X, Liu H, Niu X, et al. The use of carbon nanotubes to induce osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived MSCs in vitro and ectopic bone formation in vivo. Biomaterials 2012; 33(19): 4818-27.
74. Kim HW, Song JH, Kim HE. Bioactive glass nanofiber-collagen nanocomposite as a novel bone regeneration matrix. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 79(3): 698-705.
75. Yoshimoto H, Shin YM, Terai H, Vacanti JP. A biodegradable nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2003; 24(12): 2077-82.
76. Ruckh TT, Kumar K, Kipper MJ, Popat KC. Osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells on poly(epsiloncaprolactone) nanofiber scaffolds. Acta Biomater 2010; 6(8): 2949-59.
77. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Osteoinduction of porous bioactive titanium metal. Biomaterials 2004; 25(3): 443-50.
78. Coathup MJ, Hing KA, Samizadeh S, et al. Effect of increased strut porosity of calcium phosphate bone graft substitute biomaterials on osteoinduction. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012; 100(6): 1550-5.
79. Chuenjitkuntaworn B, Inrung W, Damrongsri D, Mekaapiruk K, Supaphol P, Pavasant P. Polycaprolactone/Hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds: Preparation, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo biological responses of human primary bone cells. J Biomed Materials Res Part A 2010; 94A(1): 241-51.
80. Borden M, El-Amin SF, Attawia M, Laurencin CT. Structural and human cellular assessment of a novel microsphere-based tissue engineered scaffold for bone repair. Biomaterials 2003; 24(4): 597-609.
81. Borden M, Attawia M, Khan Y, El-Amin SE, Laurencin CT. Tissue-engineered bone formation in vivo using a novel sintered polymeric microsphere matrix. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British Volume 2004; 86B(8): 1200-8.
82. Nukavarapu SP, Kumbar SG, Brown JL, et al. Polyphosphazene/ nano-hydroxyapatite composite microsphere scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 2008; 9(7): 1818-25.