Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast- like cells to 1α,25-(OH)2D3

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 77-85

  Boyan, B D ^a,f   Batzer, R ^b   Kieswetter, K ^a,c   Liu, Y ^a   Cochran, D L ^a   Szmuckler Moncler, S ^d   Dean, D D ^a   Schwartz, Z ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b Building 3611   (United States)

^c OsteoBiologics Inc   (United States)

^d Institut Straumann   (Switzerland)

^e HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^f Department of Orthopaedics ^*

Author keywords

1 ,25 (OH)2D3; Differentiation; Implant; Local factor; Osteoblasts; Surface roughness; Titanium

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; BIOASSAY; CATALYST ACTIVITY; ENZYMES; HORMONES; POLYSTYRENES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TISSUE CULTURE; TITANIUM;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; CALCITRIOL; PROSTAGLANDIN E2; TITANIUM; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; METAL IMPLANTATION; OSTEOBLAST; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 0030635284     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199801)39:1<77::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-L     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Z. Schwartz and B. D. Boyan, "Underlying mechanisms at the bone-biomaterial interface," J. Cell. Biochem., 56, 340-347 (1994).
2. T. Albrektsson, P.-I. Branemark, H. A. Hansson, and J. Lind-strom, "Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man," Acta Orthop. Scand., 52, 155-170 (1981).
3. K. A. Thomas and S. D. Cook, "An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition," J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 19, 875-901 (1985).
4. D. Buser, R. K. Schenk, S. Steineman, J. P. Fiorellini, C. H. Fox, and H. Stich, "Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs," J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 25, 889-902 (1991).
5. L. Carlsson, T. Rostlund, B. Albrektsson, and T. Albrektsson, "Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants," Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Impl., 3, 21-24 (1988).
6. H.-J. Wilke, L. Claes, and S. Steineman, "The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone," in Clinical Implant Materials: Advances in Biomaterials, Vol. 9, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1990, pp. 309-314.
7. C. M. Michaels, J. C. Keller, C. M. Stanford, M. Solursh, and I. C. Mackenzie, "In vitro connective tissue cell attachment to cp Ti," J. Dent. Res., 68, 276 [Abstract] (1989).
8. K. Bowers, J. Keller, B. Randolph, D. Wick, and C. Michaels, "Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro," Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Impl., 7, 302-310 (1992).
9. J. Y. Martin, Z. Schwartz, T. W. Hummert, D. M. Schraub, J. Simpson, J. Lankford, Jr., D. D. Dean, D. L. Cochran, and B. D. Boyan, "Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63)," J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 29, 389-101 (1995).
10. K. Kieswetter, Z. Schwartz, T. W. Hummert, D. L. Cochran, J. Simpson, D. D. Dean, and B. D. Boyan, "Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG63 cells," J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 32, 55-63 (1996).
11. 3 specific regulation of growth, morphology, and fibronectin in a human osteosarcoma cell line," J. Cell. Physiol., 123, 401-409 (1985).
12. 3," J. Biol. Chem., 262, 4165-4171 (1987).