Noncathartic CT colonography: Image quality assessment and performance and in a screening cohort

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 201, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 787-794

  Fletcher, Joel G ^a   Silva, Alvin C ^b   Fidler, Jeff L ^a   Cernigliaro, Joseph G ^c   Manduca, Armando ^a   Limburg, Paul J ^a   Wilson, Lynn A ^a   Engelby, Trudy A ^a   Spencer, Garrett ^a   Harmsen, W Scott ^a   Mandrekar, Jay ^a   Johnson, C Daniel ^b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Bowel preparation; Colon cancer screening; CT colonography; Patient compliance

Indexed keywords

BARIUM SULFATE; DIATRIZOATE; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOHEXOL; MEGLUMINE DIATRIZOATE; SCAN C; SORBITOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLON ADENOMA; COLON CANCER; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FECES; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; BARIUM SULFATE; CATHARTICS; COHORT STUDIES; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; CONTRAST MEDIA; ENEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84886378523     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9225     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Jones RM, Woolf SH, Cunningham TD, et al. The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38:499-507
2. Beebe TJ, Johnson CD, Stoner SM, Anderson KJ, Limburg PJ. Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography. Mayo Clin Proc 2007; 82:666-671
3. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al.; American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58:130-160
4. Friedman AC, Downing D, Chino J, Krupinski E, Kilian C, Lance P. Feasibility of remote CT colonography at two rural Native American medical centers. AJR 2010; 195:1110-1117
5. Moawad FJ, Maydonovitch CL, Cullen PA, Barlow DS, Jenson DW, Cash BD. CT colonography may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance. AJR 2010; 195:1118-1123
6. Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in populationbased screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13:55-64
7. Johnson CD, Manduca A, Fletcher JG, et al. Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: performance with and without electronic stool subtraction. AJR 2008; 190:361-366
8. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Gouw CI, et al. CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodinebased preparation schemes. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:367-376
9. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, van Rijn AF, et al. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an FOBT positive screening population. Abdom Imaging 2010; 35:661-668
10. Liedenbaum MH, van Rijn AF, de Vries AH, et al. Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening. Gut 2009; 58:1242-1249
11. Zalis ME, Blake MA, Cai W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156:692-702
12. McNamara MM, Lockhart ME, Fineberg NS, Berland LL. Oral contrast media for body CT: comparison of diatrizoate sodium and iohexol for patient acceptance and bowel opacification. AJR 2010; 195:1137-1141
13. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C, Hahn PF. CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction-initial observations. Radiology 2003; 226:911-917
14. Carston M, Manduca A, Johnson C. Electronic stool subtraction using quadratic regression, morphological operations, and distance transforms. SPIE 2007; 6511:OW1-OW12
15. Carston M, Manduca A, Wentz R, Johnson C. CT colonography of the unprepared colon: an evaluation of electronic stool subtraction. Proc SPIE 2005; 5746:424-431
16. Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL, et al. Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults. AJR 2007; 189:672-680
17. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2191-2200
18. Doshi T, Rusinak D, Halvorsen RA, Rockey DC, Suzuki K, Dachman AH. CT colonography: false-negative interpretations. Radiology 2007; 244:165-173
19. MacCarty RL, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, Wilson LA. Occult colorectal polyps on CT colonography: implications for surveillance. AJR 2006; 186:1380-1383
20. Cai W, Yoshida H, Zalis ME, Näppi JJ, Harris GJ. Informatics in radiology: electronic cleansing for noncathartic CT colonography-a structure-analysis scheme. RadioGraphics 2010; 30:585-602
21. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. AJR 2009; 193:40-46
22. Jensch S, Bipat S, Peringa J, et al. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:146-156
23. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 2000; 216:704-711
24. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 311-319
25. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004; 127:1300-1311
26. Cai W, Zalis ME, Nappi J, Harris GJ, Yoshida H. Structure-analysis method for electronic cleansing in cathartic and noncathartic CT colonography. Med Phys 2008; 35:3259-3277
27. Linguraru MG, Zhao S, Van Uitert RL, et al. CAD of colon cancer on CT colonography cases without cathartic bowel preparation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008; 2008:2996-2999
28. Johnson CD, Chen M-H, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:1207-1217
29. Iafrate F, Hassan C, Zullo A, et al. CT colonography with reduced bowel preparation after incomplete colonoscopy in the elderly. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:1385-1395
30. Keeling AN, Slattery MM, Leong S, et al. Limitedpreparation CT colonography in frail elderly patients: a feasibility study. AJR 2010; 194:1279-1287
31. McFarland EG, Fletcher JG, Pickhardt P, et al.; American College of Radiology. ACR Colon Cancer Committee white paper: status of CT colonography 2009. J Am Coll Radiol 2009; 6:756.e4-772.e4
32. Park SH, Choi EK, Lee SS, et al. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens. Radiology 2007; 244:157-164