Informatics in radiology: Electronic cleansing for non-cathartic CT colonography: A structure-analysis scheme

Radiographics

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 585-602

  Cai, Wenli ^a   Yoshida, Hiroyuki ^a   Zalis, Michael E ^a   Näppi, Janne Johannes ^a   Harris, Gordon J ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; LAXATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; FECES; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY;

CATHARTICS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; CONTRAST MEDIA; FECES; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 77953497985     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.303095154     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Morrin MM, LaMont JT. Screening virtual colonoscopy: ready for prime time? N Engl J Med 2003; 349(23):2261-2264.
2. Levin B, Brooks D, Smith RA, Stone A. Emerging technologies in screening for colorectal cancer: CT colonography, immunochemical fecal occult blood tests, and stool screening using molecular markers. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53(1):44-55.
3. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, et al. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 2001;219(3):693-698.
4. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C, Hahn PF. CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction initial observations. Radiology 2003;226(3):911-917.
5. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(6):1836-1842.
6. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004;127(5):1300-1311.
7. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M, Van Hols-beeck B. Laxative-free CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183(4):945-948.
8. Johnson KT, Carston MJ, Wentz RJ, Manduca A, Anderson SM, Johnson CD. Development of a cathartic-free colorectal cancer screening test using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(1):W29-W36.
9. Beebe TJ, Johnson CD, Stoner SM, Anderson KJ, Limburg PJ. Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82(6):666-671.
10. Zalis ME, Hahn PF. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roent-genol 2001;176(3):646-648.
11. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Hahn PF. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing for CT colonography using morphological and linear filtration methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004;23(11):1335-1343.
12. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH. Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181(3):799-805.
13. Chen D, Liang Z, Wax MR, Li L, Li B, Kaufman AE. A novel approach to extract colon lumen from CT images for virtual colonoscopy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000;19(12):1220-1226.
14. Lakare S, Chen D, Li L, Kaufman AE, Liang Z. Electronic colon cleansing using segmentation rays for virtual colonoscopy. In: Clough AV, Chen CT, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2002-physiology and function from multidimensional images. Vol 4683. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering, 2002; 412-418.
15. Wang Z, Liang Z, Li X, et al. An improved electronic colon cleansing method for detection of colonic polyps by virtual colonoscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006;53(8):1635-1646.
16. Serlie I, Truyen R, Florie J, Post F, van Vliet L, Vos F. Computed cleansing for virtual colonoscopy using a three-material transition model. In: Peters TM, Ellis RE, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention: MICCAI 2003. II. Lecture notes in computer science. Vol. 2879. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2003; 175-183.
17. Clarkston WK, Tsen TN, Dies DF, Schratz CL, Vas-wani SK, Bjerregaard P. Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective comparison. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43(1):42-48.
18. Orias M, Mahnensmith RL, Perazella MA. Extreme hyperphosphatemia and acute renal failure after a phosphorus-containing bowel regimen. Am J Neph-rol 1999;19(1):60-63.
19. Beloosesky Y, Grinblat J, Weiss A, Grosman B, Gafter U, Chagnac A. Electrolyte disorders following oral sodium phosphate administration for bowel cleansing in elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(7): 803-808.
20. Campanella D, Morra L, Delsanto S, et al. Comparison of three different iodine-based bowel regimens for CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2009 Aug 27. [Epub ahead of print]
21. Neri E, Turini F, Cerri F, Vagli P, Bartolozzi C. CT colonography: same-day tagging regimen with io-dixanol and reduced cathartic preparation. Abdom Imaging 2009;34(5):642-647.
22. Li L, Chen D, Lakare S, et al. An image segmentation approach to extract colon lumen through co-lonic material tagging and hidden Markov random field model for virtual colonoscopy. In: Clough AV, Chen CT, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2002-physiology and function from multidimensional images. Vol 4683. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering, 2002;406-411.
23. Franaszek M, Summers RM, Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR. Hybrid segmentation of colon filled with air and opacified fluid for CT colonography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25(3):358-368.
24. Li L, Wang S, Wang Z, Wang J, Lu H, Liang Z. Gain by mixture-based image segmentation for virtual colonoscopy with colonic material tagging. In: Man-duca A, Hu XP, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2007-physiology, function, and structure from medical images. Vol 6511. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering, 2007; 65110V.
25. Cai W, Zalis ME, Näppi J, Harris GJ, Yoshida H. Structure-analysis method for electronic cleansing in cathartic and noncathartic CT colonography. Med Phys 2008;35(7):3259-3277.
26. Cai W, Näppi J, Zalis ME, Harris GJ, Yoshida H. Digital bowel cleansing for computer-aided detection of polyps in fecal-tagging CT colonography. In: Reinhardt JM, Pluim JPW, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2006-image processing. Vol 6144. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering, 2006; 221-229.
27. Zalis ME, Magee C, Perumpillichira JJ, Blake MA, Sahani DV, Hahn PF. Optimizing minimal preparation digital subtraction CT colonography: prospective comparison in 150 patients [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2004; 432.
28. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Kim JY, Del Frate C, Magee C, Hahn PF. Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. Radiology 2005;236(1):118-124.
29. Wang ZJ, Coakley FV, Fu Y, et al. Renal cyst pseu-doenhancement at multidetector CT: what are the effects of number of detectors and peak tube voltage? Radiology 2008;248(3):910-916.
30. Heneghan JP, Spielmann AL, Sheafor DH, Kliewer MA, DeLong DM, Nelson RC. Pseudoenhance-ment of simple renal cysts: a comparison of single and multidetector helical CT. J Comput Assist To-mogr 2002;26(1):90-94.
31. Maki DD, Birnbaum BA, Chakraborty DP, Jacobs JE, Carvalho BM, Herman GT. Renal cyst pseu-doenhancement: beam-hardening effects on CT numbers. Radiology 1999;213(2):468-472.
32. Cai W, Yoshida H, Zalis ME, Nappi J. Delineation of tagged region by use of local iso-surface roughness in electronic cleansing for CT colonography. In: Giger ML, Karssemeijer N, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2007-computer-aided diagnosis. Vol 6514. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering, 2007; 1-9.
33. Cai W, Zalis M, Nappi J, Harris G, Yoshida H. Structure-based digital bowel cleansing for computer-aided detection of polyps in CT colonography. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2006;1(suppl 1):369-371.
34. Sato Y, Nakajima S, Shiraga N, et al. Three-dimensional multi-scale line filter for segmentation and visualization of curvilinear structures in medicalimages. Med Image Anal 1998;2(2):143-168.
35. Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Hoogeveen RM, van Wal-sum T, Viergever MA. Model-based quantitation of 3-D magnetic resonance angiographic images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999;18(10):946-956.
36. Prokop M, Galanski M. Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag, 2003.
37. Dougherty ER. An introduction to morphological image processing. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE Press,1992.
38. Vapnik VN. The nature of statistical learning theory. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2000.
39. Cai W, Holalkere NS, Harris G, Sahani D, Yoshida H. Dynamic-threshold level set method for volum-etry of porcine kidney in CT images: in vivo and ex vivo assessment of the accuracy of volume measurement. Acad Radiol 2007;14(7):890-896.
40. Osher S, Fedkiw R. Level set methods and dynamic implicit surface. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag,2002.
41. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for co-lorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349(23):2191-2200.
42. Näppi J, Yoshida H. Fully automated three-dimensional detection of polyps in fecal-tagging CT colonography. Acad Radiol 2007;14(3):287-300.