Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: Performance with and without electronic stool subtraction

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 190, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 361-366

  Johnson, C Daniel ^a   Manduca, Armando ^b   Fletcher, Joel G ^b   MacCarty, Robert L ^b   Carston, Michael J ^c   Harmsen, W Scott ^b   Mandrekar, Jay N ^b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c MAYO GRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon cancer; Colon polyps; CT colonography; Electronic stool subtraction

Indexed keywords

BARIUM SULFATE; GLUCAGON; SCAN C; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEDTIME DOSAGE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; FECES; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORNING DOSAGE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BARIUM SULFATE; CATHARTICS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FECES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 38849113377     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2700     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56:106-130
2. Winawer S, Stewart E, Zauber A, et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1766-1772
3. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2191-2200
4. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004; 291:1713-1719
5. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005; 365:305-311
6. Beebe TJ, Johnson CD, Stoner SM, Anderson KJ, Limburg PJ. Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography. Mayo Clin Proc 2007; 82:666-671
7. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening by CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preference. Radiology 2003; 227:378-384
8. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, et al. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 219:693-698
9. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004; 127:1300-1311
10. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Magee C, Kohlberg G, Hahn PF. Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability. Radiology 2006; 239:149-159 [Erratum in Radiology 1006; 240:304]
11. Carsten MJ, Wentz RJ, Manduca A, Johnson CD. CT colonography of the unprepared colon: an evaluation of electronic stool subtraction. In: Amin AA, ed. Medical imaging: physiology, function and structure from biomedical imaging (proceedings of SPIE). Bellingham, WA: SPIE, 2005; 5746:424-431
12. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B. Laxative-free CT colonography. AJR 2004; 183:945-948
13. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR 2005; 184: 1836-1842
14. Johnson CD, Manduca A, Carsten MJ, et al. CTC of the noncathartic colon: performance appraisal using combined unsubtracted and stool subtracted data sets. Proceedings of the Radiological Society of North America 92nd annual meeting. Chicago, IL: Radiological Society of North America, 2006:264-265
15. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003; 125:311-319
16. Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, et al. Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2:314-321
17. Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Metaanalysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142:635-650
18. Dachman AH, Dawson DO, Lefere P, et al. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Abdom Imaging 2007; 32:96-104