The proteasome-associated protein Ecm29 inhibits proteasomal ATPase activity and in vivo protein degradation by the proteasome

Journal of Biological Chemistry

Volumn 288, Issue 41, 2013, Pages 29467-29481

  De La Mota Peynado, Alina ^a   Lee, Stella Yu Chien ^a   Pierce, Brianne Marie ^a   Wani, Prashant ^a   Singh, Chingakham Ranjit ^a   Roelofs, Jeroen ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

26 S PROTEASOME; ATP-ASE ACTIVITY; CHEMICAL CROSS-LINKING; PEPTIDE SUBSTRATES; PROTEASOME INHIBITORS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEOLYTIC CLEAVAGE; SUBSTRATE DEGRADATION;

CROSSLINKING; DEGRADATION; SUBSTRATES;

PROTEINS;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; PROTEASOME; PROTEASOME INHIBITOR; PROTEIN ECM29; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECM29 GENE; ENZYME INHIBITION; ENZYME REGULATION; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; ENZYME SUBUNIT; FUNGAL STRAIN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; YEAST;

ATP-DEPENDENT PROTEASE; ATPASES; MOLECULAR CHAPERONE; PROTEASE INHIBITOR; PROTEASOME; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; UBIQUITIN-DEPENDENT PROTEASE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; IMMUNOBLOTTING; MUTATION; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; PROTEOLYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; UBIQUITINATED PROTEINS;

EID: 84885586226     PISSN: 00219258     EISSN: 1083351X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.491662     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Finley, D. (2009) Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 477-513
2. Schrader, E. K., Harstad, K. G., and Matouschek, A. (2009) Targeting proteins for degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 815-822
3. Tomko, R. J., Jr., and Hochstrasser, M. (2013) Molecular Architecture and Assembly of the eukaryotic Proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82, 415-445
4. Liu, C. W., and Jacobson, A. D. (2013) Functions of the 19S complex in proteasomal degradation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 38, 103-110
5. Orlowski, R. Z., and Kuhn, D. J. (2008) Proteasome inhibitors in cancer therapy. Lessons from the first decade. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 1649-1657
6. McCutchen-Maloney, S. L. (2000) cDNA cloning, expression, and functional characterization of PI31, a proline-rich inhibitor of the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18557-18565
7. Park, Y., Hwang, Y. P., Lee, J. S., Seo, S. H., Yoon, S. K., and Yoon, J. B. (2005) Proteasomal ATPase-associated factor 1 negatively regulates proteasome activity by interacting with proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 3842-3853
8. Shim, S. M., Lee, W. J., Kim, Y., Chang, J. W., Song, S., and Jung, Y. K. (2012) Role of S5b/PSMD5 in proteasome inhibition caused by TNF-α/ NFκB in higher eukaryotes. Cell Rep. 2, 603-615
9. Cho-Park, P. F., and Steller, H. (2013) Proteasome regulation by ADPribosylation. Cell 153, 614-627
10. Park, S., Roelofs, J., Kim, W., Robert, J., Schmidt, M., Gygi, S. P., and Finley, D. (2009) Hexameric assembly of the proteasomal ATPases is templated through their C termini. Nature 459, 866-870
11. Roelofs, J., Park, S., Haas, W., Tian, G., McAllister, F. E., Huo, Y., Lee, B. H., Zhang, F., Shi, Y., Gygi, S. P., and Finley, D. (2009) Chaperone-mediated pathway of proteasome regulatory particle assembly. Nature 459, 861-865
12. Barrault, M. B., Richet, N., Godard, C., Murciano, B., Le Tallec, B., Rousseau, E., Legrand, P., Charbonnier, J. B., Le Du, M. H., Guérois, R., Ochsenbein, F., and Peyroche, A. (2012) Dual functions of the Hsm3 protein in chaperoning and scaffolding regulatory particle subunits during the proteasome assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, E1001-E1010
13. Park, S., Li, X., Kim, H. M., Singh, C. R., Tian, G., Hoyt, M. A., Lovell, S., Battaile, K. P., Zolkiewski, M., Coffino, P., Roelofs, J., Cheng, Y., and Finley, D. (2013) Reconfiguration of the proteasome during chaperone-mediated assembly. Nature 497, 512-516
14. Bedford, L., Paine, S., Sheppard, P. W., Mayer, R. J., and Roelofs, J. (2010) Assembly, structure, and function of the 26S proteasome. Trends Cell Biol. 20, 391-401
15. Guo, X., Engel, J. L., Xiao, J., Tagliabracci, V. S., Wang, X., Huang, L., and Dixon, J. E. (2011) UBLCP1 is a 26S proteasome phosphatase that regulates nuclear proteasome activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 18649-18654
16. Um, J. W., Im, E., Park, J., Oh, Y., Min, B., Lee, H. J., Yoon, J. B., and Chung, K. C. (2010) ASK1 negatively regulates the 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 36434-36446
17. Leggett, D. S., Hanna, J., Borodovsky, A., Crosas, B., Schmidt, M., Baker, R. T., Walz, T., Ploegh, H., and Finley, D. (2002) Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol. Cell 10, 495-507
18. Hanna, J., Hathaway, N. A., Tone, Y., Crosas, B., Elsasser, S., Kirkpatrick, D. S., Leggett, D. S., Gygi, S. P., King, R. W., and Finley, D. (2006) Deubiquitinating enzyme Ubp6 functions noncatalytically to delay proteasomal degradation. Cell 127, 99-111
19. Lee, B.-H., Lee, M. J., Park, S., Oh, D.-C., Elsasser, S., Chen, P.-C., Gartner, C., Dimova, N., Hanna, J., Gygi, S. P., Wilson, S. M., King, R. W., and Finley, D. (2010) Enhancement of proteasome activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of USP14. Nature 467, 179-184
20. Peth, A., Besche, H. C., and Goldberg, A. L. (2009) Ubiquitinated proteins activate the proteasome by binding to Usp14/Ubp6, which causes 20S gate opening. Mol. Cell 36, 794-804
21. Gorbea, C., Goellner, G. M., Teter, K., Holmes, R. K., and Rechsteiner, M. (2004) Characterization of mammalian Ecm29, a 26 S proteasome-associated protein that localizes to the nucleus and membrane vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 54849-54861
22. Kleijnen, M. F., Roelofs, J., Park, S., Hathaway, N. A., Glickman, M., King, R. W., and Finley, D. (2007) Stability of the proteasome can be regulated allosterically through engagement of its proteolytic active sites. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1180-1188
23. Park, S., Kim, W., Tian, G., Gygi, S. P., and Finley, D. (2011) Structural defects in the regulatory particle-core particle interface of the proteasome induce a novel proteasome stress response. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 36652-36666
24. Wang, X., Yen, J., Kaiser, P., and Huang, L. (2010) Regulation of the 26S Proteasome Complex During Oxidative Stress. Sci. Signal. 3, ra88
25. Gorbea, C., Pratt, G., Ustrell, V., Bell, R., Sahasrabudhe, S., Hughes, R. E., and Rechsteiner, M. (2010) A protein interaction network for Ecm29 links the 26 S proteasome to molecular motors and endosomal components. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 31616-31633
26. Lee, S. Y., De la Mota-Peynado, A., and Roelofs, J. (2011) Loss of Rpt5 protein interactions with the core particle and Nas2 protein causes the formation of faulty proteasomes that are inhibited by Ecm29 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 36641-36651
27. Lehmann, A., Niewienda, A., Jechow, K., Janek, K., and Enenkel, C. (2010) Ecm29 fulfils quality control functions in proteasome assembly. Mol. Cell 38, 879-888
28. Panasenko, O. O., and Collart, M. A. (2011) Not4 E3 ligase contributes to proteasome assembly and functional integrity in part through Ecm29. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 1610-1623
29. Janke, C., Magiera, M. M., Rathfelder, N., Taxis, C., Reber, S., Maekawa, H., Moreno-Borchart, A., Doenges, G., Schwob, E., Schiebel, E., and Knop, M. (2004) A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes. New fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21, 947-962
30. Elsasser, S., Schmidt, M., and Finley, D. (2005) Characterization of the proteasome using native gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol. 398, 353-363
31. Saeki, Y., Isono, E., and Toh-E, A. (2005) Preparation of ubiquitinated substrates by the PY motif-insertion method for monitoring 26S proteasome activity. Methods Enzymol. 399, 215-227
32. Erales, J., Hoyt, M. A., Troll, F., and Coffino, P. (2012) Functional asymmetries of proteasome translocase pore. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 18535-18543
33. Bachmair, A., Finley, D., and Varshavsky, A. (1986) In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science 234, 179-186
34. Gillette, T. G., Kumar, B., Thompson, D., Slaughter, C. A., and DeMartino, G. N. (2008) Differential roles of the COOH termini of AAA subunits of PA700 (19 S regulator) in asymmetric assembly and activation of the 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 31813-31822
35. Smith, D. M., Chang, S.-C., Park, S., Finley, D., Cheng, Y., and Goldberg, A. L. (2007) Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's α ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol. Cell 27, 731-744
36. Gandre, S., and Kahana, C. (2002) Degradation of ornithine decarboxylase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is ubiquitin independent. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 293, 139-144
37. Murakami, Y., Matsufuji, S., Kameji, T., Hayashi, S., Igarashi, K., Tamura, T., Tanaka, K., and Ichihara, A. (1992) Ornithine decarboxylase is degraded by the 26S proteasome without ubiquitination. Nature 360, 597-599
38. Fleming, J. A., Lightcap, E. S., Sadis, S., Thoroddsen, V., Bulawa, C. E., and Blackman, R. K. (2002) Complementary whole-genome technologies reveal the cellular response to proteasome inhibition by PS-341. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 1461-1466
39. Schmidt, M., Haas, W., Crosas, B., Santamaria, P. G., Gygi, S. P., Walz, T., and Finley, D. (2005) The HEAT repeat protein Blm10 regulates the yeast proteasome by capping the core particle. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 294-303
40. Groll, M., Bajorek, M., Köhler, A., Moroder, L., Rubin, D. M., Huber, R., Glickman, M. H., and Finley, D. (2000) A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 1062-1067
41. Henderson, A., Erales, J., Hoyt, M. A., and Coffino, P. (2011) Dependence of proteasome processing rate on substrate unfolding. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 17495-17502
42. Guerrero, C., Tagwerker, C., Kaiser, P., and Huang, L. (2006) An integrated mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach. Quantitative analysis of tandem affinity-purified in vivo cross-linked protein complexes (QTAX) to decipher the 26 S proteasome-interacting network. Mol. Cell Proteomics 5, 366-378
43. Stadtmueller, B. M., Ferrell, K., Whitby, F. G., Heroux, A., Robinson, H., Myszka, D. G., and Hill, C. P. (2010) Structural models for interactions between the 20S proteasome and its PAN/19S activators. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 13-17
44. Rabl, J., Smith, D. M., Yu, Y., Chang, S.-C., Goldberg, A. L., and Cheng, Y. (2008) Mechanism of gate opening in the 20S proteasome by the proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Cell 30, 360-368
45. Lander, G. C., Martin, A., and Nogales, E. (2013) The proteasome under the microscope. The regulatory particle in focus. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23, 243-251
46. Matyskiela, M. E., Lander, G. C., and Martin, A. (2013) Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 781-788
47. Tian, G., Park, S., Lee, M. J., Huck, B., McAllister, F., Hill, C. P., Gygi, S. P., and Finley, D. (2011) An asymmetric interface between the regulatory and core particles of the proteasome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1259-1267
48. Osmulski, P. A., Hochstrasser, M., and Gaczynska, M. (2009)Atetrahedral transition state at the active sites of the 20S proteasome is coupled to opening of the α-ring channel. Structure 17, 1137-1147
49. Smith, D. M., Fraga, H., Reis, C., Kafri, G., and Goldberg, A. L. (2011) ATP binds to proteasomal ATPases in pairs with distinct functional effects, implying an ordered reaction cycle. Cell 144, 526-538
50. Stanhill, A., Haynes, C. M., Zhang, Y., Min, G., Steele, M. C., Kalinina, J., Martinez, E., Pickart, C. M., Kong, X. P., and Ron, D. (2006) An arseniteinducible 19S regulatory particle-associated protein adapts proteasomes to proteotoxicity. Mol. Cell 23, 875-885
51. Beck, F., Unverdorben, P., Bohn, S., Schweitzer, A., Pfeifer, G., Sakata, E., Nickell, S., Plitzko, J. M., Villa, E., Baumeister, W., and Förster, F. (2012) Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 14870-14875
52. da Fonseca, P. C., He, J., and Morris, E. P. (2012) Molecular model of the human 26S proteasome. Mol. Cell 46, 54-66
53. Lander, G. C., Estrin, E., Matyskiela, M. E., Bashore, C., Nogales, E., and Martin, A. (2012) Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 482, 186-191
54. Lasker, K., Förster, F., Bohn, S., Walzthoeni, T., Villa, E., Unverdorben, P., Beck, F., Aebersold, R., Sali, A., and Baumeister, W. (2012) Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 1380-1387
55. Kim, Y. C., Li, X., Thompson, D., and DeMartino, G. N. (2013) ATPbinding by proteasomal ATPases regulates cellular assembly and substrate- induced functions of the 26S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 3334-3345
56. Rubin, D. M., Glickman, M. H., Larsen, C. N., Dhruvakumar, S., and Finley, D. (1998) Active site mutants in the six regulatory particle ATPases reveal multiple roles for ATP in the proteasome. EMBO J. 17, 4909-4919
57. Lee, S. H., Moon, J. H., Yoon, S. K., and Yoon, J. B. (2012) Stable incorporation of ATPase subunits into 19 S regulatory particle of human proteasome requires nucleotide binding and C-terminal tails. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 9269-9279
58. D'Arcy, P., Brnjic, S., Olofsson, M. H., Fryknäs, M., Lindsten, K., De Cesare, M., Perego, P., Sadeghi, B., Hassan, M., Larsson, R., and Linder, S. (2011) Inhibition of proteasome deubiquitinating activity as a new cancer therapy. Nat. Med. 17, 1636-1640
59. Kourtis, N., and Tavernarakis, N. (2011) Cellular stress response pathways and ageing. Intricate molecular relationships. EMBO J. 30, 2520-2531
60. Finley, D., Ozkaynak, E., and Varshavsky, A. (1987) The yeast polyubiquitin gene is essential for resistance to high temperatures, starvation, and other stresses. Cell 48, 1035-1046
61. Bajorek, M., Finley, D., and Glickman, M. H. (2003) Proteasome disassembly and downregulation is correlated with viability during stationary phase. Curr. Biol. 13, 1140-1144