Engagement with young adult literature: Outcomes and processes

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 255-275

  Ivey, Gay ^a   Johnston, Peter H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885578407     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rrq.46     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Allington, R.L., McGill-Franzen, A., Camilli, G., Williams, L., Graff, J., Zeig, J., et al. (2010). Addressing summer reading setback among economically disadvantaged elementary students. Reading Psychology, 31(5), 411-427. doi:10.1080/02702711.2010.505165
2. Anderson, R.C., Wilson, P.T., & Fielding, L.G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 285-303. doi:10.1598/RRQ.23.3.2
3. Applebee, A. (1993). Literature in the secondary school: Studies of curriculum and instruction in the Unites States. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
4. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261-278. doi: 10.1348/000709902158883
5. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
6. Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C.E. (2006). Reading next - A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
7. Buber, M. (1937). I and thou (R.G. Smith, Trans.). Edinburgh, UK: T. & T. Clark. (Original work published 1923)
8. Christenson, S., Reschly, A.L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer.
9. Coats, K. (2011). Young adult literature: Growing up, in theory. In S.A. Wolf, K. Coats, P. Enciso, & C.A. Jenkins (Eds.), Handbook of research on children's and young adult literature (pp. 315-329). New York: Routledge.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
11. Cunningham, J.W. (2001). The National Reading Panel report [Essay book review]. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 326-335. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.3.5
12. Deakin Crick, R. (2012). Deep engagement as a complex system: Identity, learning power and authentic enquiry. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 675-694). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7-32
13. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
14. Eccles, J., & Wang, M.-T. (2012). Part I commentary: So what is student engagement anyway? In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133-145). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7-6
15. Enciso, P. (1996). Why engagement in reading matters to Molly. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 12(2), 171-194. doi:10.1080/1057356960120205
16. Fernyhough, C. (2008). Getting Vygotskian about theory of mind: Mediation, dialogue, and the development of social understanding. Developmental Review, 28(2), 225-262. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.03.001
17. Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
18. Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In P.B. Mosenthal, M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., & Klauda, S.L. (2012). Adolescents' engagement in academic literacy. Retrieved February 8, 2013, from www.cori.umd.edu/research-publications/2012-adolescents- engagement-ebook.pdf
20. Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601-634). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7-29
21. Hale, L., & Crowe, C. (2001). "I hate reading if I don't have to": Results from a longitudinal study of high school students' reading interest. The ALAN Review, 28(3), 49-57.
22. Hermans, H.J.M., & Kempen, H.J.G. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego, CA: Academic.
23. Hirsch, E.D. (1988). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York: Vintage.
24. Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2001). "Just plain reading": A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 350-377. doi:10.1598/RRQ .36.4.2
25. Kaufman, G.F., & Libby, L.K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1-19. doi:10.1037/a0027525
26. Kim, J.S., & White, T.G. (2008). Scaffolding voluntary summer reading for children in grades 3 to 5: An experimental study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(1), 1-23. doi:10.1080/10888430 701746849
27. Lewis, C., & Dockter, J. (2011). Reading literature in secondary school: Disciplinary discourses in global times. In S.A. Wolf, K. Coats, P. Enciso, & C.A. Jenkins (Eds.), Handbook of research on children's and young adult literature (pp. 76-91). New York: Routledge.
28. Lysaker, J., & Miller, A. (2012). Engaging social imagination: The developmental work of wordless book reading. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1468798411430425
29. Lysaker, J., Tonge, C., Gauson, D., & Miller, A. (2011). Reading and social imagination: What relationally oriented reading instruction can do for children. Reading Psychology, 32(6), 520-566.
30. Markus, H.R., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
31. Moje, E.B. (2000). To be part of the story: The literacy practices of gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102(3), 651-690.
32. Moje, E.B., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N., & Morris, K. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107-154.
33. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34. Nell, V. (1988). The psychology of reading for pleasure: Needs and gratifications. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(1), 6-50.
35. Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn: Student engagement, strategies and practices (Vol. 3). Paris: OECD.
37. Peterson, P., Swing, S., Stark, K., & Wass, G. (1984). Students' cognitions and time on task during mathematics instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 487-515.
38. Rampey, B.D., Dion, G.S., & Donahue, P.L. (2009). NAEP 2008 trends in academic progress (NCES 2009-479). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
39. Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination perspective theory on student engagement. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7-7
40. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
41. Reis, H.T., Sheldon, K.M., Gable, S.L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 419-435. doi:10.1177/ 0146167200266002
42. Reschly, A.L., & Christenson, S.L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3-19). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7-1
43. Rosenblatt, L. (1983). Literature as exploration. New York: Modern Language Association of America.
44. Rosenblatt, L.M. (1985). Viewpoints: Transaction versus interaction - A terminological rescue operation. Research in the Teaching of English, 19(1), 96-107.
45. Scherff, L., & Piazza, C.L. (2008). Why now, more than ever, we need to talk about opportunity to learn. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(4), 343-352. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.4.7
46. Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421.
47. Sewell, W.C. (2008). Entrenched pedagogy: A history of stasis in the English language arts curriculum in the United States secondary schools. Changing English, 15(1), 87-100. doi:10.1080/1358684070 1825345
48. Shanahan, T. (2003). Research-based reading instruction: Myths about the National Reading Panel report. The Reading Teacher, 56(7), 646-655.
49. Skinner, E.A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., & Connell, J.P. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(2/3). doi:10.2307/1166220
50. Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: Expanding Vygotsky's (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 471-491. doi:10.1007/s11422-008- 9111-3
51. Stetsenko, A. (2012). Personhood: An activist project of historical becoming through collaborative pursuits of social transformation. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 144-153. doi:10.1016/ j.newideapsych.2009.11.008
52. Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I.M. (2004). The self in cultural-historical activity theory: Reclaiming the unity of social and individual dimensions of human development. Theory & Psychology, 14(4), 475-503. doi:10.1177/0959354304044921
53. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Sugarman, J. (2005). Persons and moral agency. Theory & Psychology, 15(6), 793-811.
55. Torgesen, J. K., Houston, D. D., Rissman, L. M., Decker, S. M., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J. Francis, D. J, Rivera, M. O., Lesaux, N et al. (2007). Academic literacy instruction for adolescents: A guidance document from the Center on Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Center on Instruction, RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
56. U. S. Census Bureau. (2010). State & county QuickFacts. Retrieved February 21, 2013, from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/.
57. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420-432. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
58. Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J.T., Perencevich, K.C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S.L., McRae, A., et al. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 432-445. doi:10.1002/pits.20307
59. Worthy, J., Moorman, M., & Turner, M. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find in school. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(1), 12-27. doi:10.1598/RRQ.34.1.2
60. Yagleski, R.P. (2005). Stasis and change: English education and the crisis of sustainability. English Education, 37(4), 262-271.
61. Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
62. Yazzie-Mintz, E., & McCormick, K. (2012). Find the humanity in the data: Understanding, measuring, and strengthening student engagement. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 743-761). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614- 2018-7-36