Erratum: Molecular dynamics simulations of highly crowded amino acid solutions: Comparisons of eight different force field combinations with experiment and with each other (Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (2013) 9 (4585-4602) DOI: 10.1021/ct400371h);Molecular dynamics simulations of highly crowded amino acid solutions: Comparisons of eight different force field combinations with experiment and with each other

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 4585-4602

  Andrews, Casey T ^a   Elcock, Adrian H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885405882     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: 15499626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct500151a     Document Type: Erratum

References (108)

1. Fulton, A. B. How Crowded Is the Cytoplasm? Cell 1982, 30, 345-347
2. Ellis, R. J.; Minton, A. P. Cell Biology-Join the Crowd Nature 2003, 425, 27-28
3. Zimmerman, S. B.; Trach, S. O. Estimation of Macromolecule Concentrations and Excluded Volume Effects for the Cytoplasm of Escherichia coli J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 222, 599-620
4. Elowitz, M. B.; Surette, M. G.; Wolf, P. E.; Stock, J. B.; Leibler, S. Protein Mobility in the Cytoplasm of Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 197-203
5. Dix, J. A.; Verkman, A. S. Crowding Effects on Diffusion in Solutions and Cells Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2008, 37, 247-263
6. Ghaemmaghami, S.; Oas, T. G. Quantitative Protein Stability Measurement in Vivo Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001, 8, 879-882
7. Ignatova, Z.; Krishnan, B.; Bombardier, J. P.; Marcelino, A. M. C.; Hong, J.; Gierasch, L. M. From the Test Tube to the Cell: Exploring the Folding and Aggregation of a β-Clam Protein Biopolymers 2007, 88, 157-163
8. Ebbinghaus, S.; Dhar, A.; McDonald, J. D.; Gruebele, M. Protein Folding Stability and Dynamics Imaged in a Living Cell Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 319-323
9. Dhar, A.; Girdhar, K.; Singh, D.; Gelman, H.; Ebbinghaus, S.; Gruebele, M. Protein Stability and Folding Kinetics in the Nucleus and Endoplasmic Reticulum of Eukaryotic Cells Biophys. J. 2011, 101, 421-430
10. Phillip, Y.; Kiss, V.; Schreiber, G. Protein-Binding Dynamics Imaged in a Living Cell Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109, 1461-1466
11. Zhou, H. X.; Rivas, G.; Minton, A. P. Macromolecular Crowding and Confinement: Biochemical, Biophysical, and Potential Physiological Consequences Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2008, 37, 375-397
12. Elcock, A. H. Models of Macromolecular Crowding Effects and the Need for Quantitative Comparisons with Experiment Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2010, 20, 196-206
13. Yap, E.-H.; Head-Gordon, T. Calculating the Bimolecular Rate of Protein-Protein Association with Interacting Crowders J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 2481-2489
14. Frembgen-Kesner, T.; Elcock, A. H. Computer Simulations of the Bacterial Cytoplasm Biophys. Rev. 2013, 5, 109-119
15. Bicout, D. J.; Field, M. J. Stochastic Dynamics Simulations of Macromolecular Diffusion in a Model of the Cytoplasm of Escherichia coli J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 2489-2497
16. Ridgway, D.; Broderick, G.; Lopez-Campistrous, A.; Ru'aini, M.; Winter, P.; Hamilton, M.; Boulanger, P.; Kovalenko, A.; Ellison, M. J. Coarse-Grained Molecular Simulation of Diffusion and Reaction Kinetics in a Crowded Virtual Cytoplasm Biophys. J. 2008, 94, 3748-3759
17. McGuffee, S. R.; Elcock, A. H. Diffusion, Crowding & Protein Stability in a Dynamic Molecular Model of the Bacterial Cytoplasm PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6 e1000694
18. Ando, T.; Skolnick, J. Crowding and Hydrodynamic Interactions Likely Dominate in Vivo Macromolecular Motion Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107, 18457-18462
19. Frembgen-Kesner, T.; Elcock, A. H. Striking Effects of Hydrodynamic Interactions on the Simulated Diffusion and Folding of Proteins J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 242-256
20. Mereghetti, P.; Wade, R. C. Atomic Detail Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Concentrated Protein Solutions with a Mean Field Treatment of Hydrodynamic Interactions J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 8523-8533
21. Cossins, B.; Jacobson, M. P.; Guallar, V. A New View of the Bacterial Cytosol Environment PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7 e1002066
22. Harada, R.; Sugita, Y.; Feig, M. Protein Crowding Affects Hydration Structure and Dynamics J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4842-4849
23. Feig, M.; Sugita, Y. Variable Interactions between Protein Crowders and Biomolecular Solutes Are Important in Understanding Cellular Crowding J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 599-605
24. Miklos, A. C.; Sarkar, M.; Wang, Y.; Pielak, G. J. Protein Crowding Tunes Protein Stability J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7116-7120
25. van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; Groenhof, G.; Mark, A. E.; Berendsen, H. J. C. GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, Free J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1701-1718
26. Hess, B.; Kutzner, C.; van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 435-447
27. Nosé, S. A Unified Formulation of the Constant Temperature Molecular-Dynamics Methods J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 511-519
28. Hoover, W. G. Canonical Dynamics-Equilibrium Phase-Space Distributions Phys. Rev. A 1985, 31, 1695-1697
29. Parrinello, M.; Rahman, A. Polymorphic Transitions in Single Crystals-A New Molecular-Dynamics Method J. Appl. Phys. 1981, 52, 7182-7190
30. Essmann, U.; Perera, L.; Berkowitz, M. L.; Darden, T.; Lee, H.; Pedersen, L. G. A Smooth Particle Mesh Ewald Method J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 8577-8593
31. Hess, B.; Bekker, H.; Berendsen, H. J. C.; Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: A Linear Constraint Solver for Molecular Simulations J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 12, 1463-1472
32. Hornak, V.; Abel, R.; Okur, A.; Strockbine, B.; Roitberg, A.; Simmerling, C. Comparison of Multiple AMBER Force Fields and Development of Improved Protein Backbone Parameters Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2006, 65, 712-725
33. Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Piana, S.; Palmo, K.; Maragakis, P.; Klepeis, J. L.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E. Improved Side-Chain Torsion Potentials for the AMBER Ff99sb Protein Force Field Proteins-Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2010, 78, 1950-1958
34. Jorgensen, W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R. W.; Klein, M. L. Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926-935
35. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Grigera, J. R.; Straatsma, T. P. The Missing Term in Effective Pair Potentials J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269-6271
36. Horn, H. W.; Swope, W. C.; Pitera, J. W.; Madura, J. D.; Dick, T. J.; Hura, G. L.; Head-Gordon, T. Development of an Improved Four-Site Water Model for Biomolecular Simulations: TIP4P-Ew J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 9665-9678
37. Oostenbrink, C.; Villa, A.; Mark, A. E.; van Gunsteren, W. F. A Biomolecular Force Field Based on the Free Enthalpy of Hydration and Solvation: The GROMOS Force-Field Parameter Sets 53A5 and 53A6 J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1656-1676
38. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Hermans, J. Interaction Models for Water in Relation to Protein Hydration. In Intermolecular Forces; Pullman, B., Ed.; Reidel: Dordrecht, Holland, 1981; pp 331-342.
39. MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Bashford, D.; Bellott, M.; Dunbrack, R. L., Jr.; Evanseck, J. D.; Field, M. J.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Guo, H.; Ha, S.; Joseph-McCarthy, D.; Kuchnir, L.; Kuczera, K.; Lau, F. T. K.; Mattos, C.; Michnick, S.; Ngo, T.; Nguyen, D. T.; Prodhom, B.; Reiher, W. E., III; Roux, B.; Schlenkrich, M.; Smith, J. C.; Stote, R.; Straub, J.; Watanabe, M.; Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera, J.; Yin, D.; Karplus, M. All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 3586-3616
40. MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Feig, M.; Brooks, C. L., III Extending the Treatment of Backbone Energetics in Protein Force Fields: Limitations of Gas-Phase Quantum Mechanics in Reproducing Protein Conformational Distributions in Molecular Dynamics Simulations J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1400-1415
41. Kaminski, G. A.; Friesner, R. A.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W. L. Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6474
42. Mahoney, M. W.; Jorgensen, W. L. A Five-Site Model for Liquid Water and the Reproduction of the Density Anomaly by Rigid, Nonpolarizable Potential Functions J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 8910-8922
43. Bjelkmar, P.; Larsson, P.; Cuendet, M. A.; Hess, B.; Lindahl, E. Implementation of the CHARMM Force Field in GROMACS: Analysis of Protein Stability Effects from Correction Maps, Virtual Interaction Sites, and Water Models J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 459-466
44. Vanquelef, E.; Simon, S.; Marquant, G.; Garcia, E.; Klimerak, G.; Delepine, J. C.; Cieplak, P.; Dupradeau, F.-Y. R.E.D. Server: A Web Service for Deriving RESP and ESP Charges and Building Force Field Libraries for New Molecules and Molecular Fragments Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W511-W517
45. Cornell, W. D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C. I.; Gould, I. R.; Merz, K. M.; Ferguson, D. M.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Fox, T.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A. A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids and Organic Molecules J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179-5197
46. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 93 rd ed.; Haynes, W. M., Ed.; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 2012.
47. Palmer, B. J. Transverse-Current Autocorrelation-Function Calculations of the Shear Viscosity for Molecular Liquids Phys. Rev. E 1994, 49, 359-366
48. Hess, B. Determining the Shear Viscosity of Model Liquids from Molecular Dynamics Simulations J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 209-217
49. Harris, K. R.; Woolf, L. A. Temperature and Volume Dependence of the Viscosity of Water and Heavy Water at Low Temperatures J. Chem. Eng. Data 2004, 49, 1064-1069
50. Neumann, M. Dipole Moment Fluctuation Formulas in Computer Simulations of Polar Systems Mol. Phys. 1983, 50, 841-858
51. van der Spoel, D.; van Maaren, P. J.; Berendsen, H. J. C. A Systematic Study of Water Models for Molecular Simulation: Derivation of Water Models Optimized for use with a Reaction Field J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 10220-10230
52. Yang, L.; Weerasinghe, S.; Smith, P. E.; Pettitt, B. M. Dielectric Response of Triplex DNA in Ionic Solution Biophys. J. 1995, 69, 1519-1527
53. Malmberg, C. G.; Maryott, A. A. Dielectric Constant of Water from 0 to 100 C J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 1956, 56, 1-8
54. Banipal, T. S.; Kaur, D.; Banipal, P. K. Apparent Molar Volumes and Viscosities of Some Amino Acids in Aqueous Sodium Acetate Solutions at 298.15 K J. Chem. Eng. Data 2004, 49, 1236-1246
55. Duke, M. M.; Hakin, A. W.; McKay, R. M.; Preuss, K. E. The Volumetric and Thermochemical Properties of Aqueous-Solutions of l -Valine, l -Leucine, and l -Isoleucine at 288.15-K, 298.15-K, 313.15-K, and 328.15-K Can. J. Chem. 1994, 72, 1489-1494
56. Yasuda, Y.; Tochio, N.; Sakurai, M.; Nitta, K. Partial Molar Volumes and Isentropic Compressibilities of Amino Acids in Dilute Aqueous Solutions J. Chem. Eng. Data 1998, 43, 205-214
57. Banipal, T. S.; Singh, G. Thermodynamic Study of Solvation of Some Amino Acids, Diglycinecine and Lysozyme in Aqueous and Mixed Aqueous Solutions Thermochim. Acta 2004, 412, 63-83
58. Thirumaran, S.; Sabu, K. J. Ultrasonic Investigation of Amino Acids in Aqueous Sodium Acetate Medium Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 2009, 47, 87-96
59. Palani, R.; Geetha, A. Acoustical and Thermodynamical Studies of l -Serine, l -Glutamine, and l -Asparagine in Aqueous d -Glucose Solutions at 298.15 K Res. J. Phys. 2007, 1, 82-89
60. Devoto, G. The Dielectric Constant of Liquids. III. Aqueous Solutions of Some Organic Compounds Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1930, 60, 520-530
61. Devoto, G. The Dielectric Constant of Liquids. V. Aqueous Solutions of Some Organic Compounds Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1931, 61, 897-909
62. Suzuki, M.; Shigematsu, J.; Fukunishi, Y.; Kodama, T. Hydrophobic Hydration Analysis on Amino Acid Solutions by the Microwave Dielectric Method J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 3839-3845
63. Thomas, A. S.; Elcock, A. H. Direct Measurement of the Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Association of Hydrophobic Molecules from Molecular Dynamics Simulations J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 19-24
64. Thomas, A. S.; Elcock, A. H. Molecular Simulations Suggest Protein Salt Bridges Are Uniquely Suited to Life at High Temperatures J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2208-2214
65. Ellerton, H. D.; Reinfelds, G.; Mulcahy, D. E.; Dunlop, P. J. Activity, Density, and Relative Viscosity Data for Several Amino Acids, Lactamide, and Raffinose in Aqueous Solution at 25 J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 398-402
66. Wyman, J., Jr. The Dielectric Constant of Solutions of Dipolar Ions Chem. Rev. 1936, 19, 213-239
67. Boresch, S.; Willensdorfer, M.; Steinhauser, O. A Molecular Dynamics Study of the Dielectric Properties of Aqueous Solutions of Alanine and Alanine Dipeptide J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 3333-3347
68. Kirchnerova, J.; Farrell, P. G.; Edward, J. T. Dielectric Increments and the Conformations of Amino Acids and Betaines in Water J. Phys. Chem. 1976, 80, 1974-1980
69. Blundell, T.; Singh, J.; Thornton, J.; Burley, S. K.; Petsko, G. A. Aromatic Interactions Science 1986, 234, 1005
70. Palmer, D. S.; McDonagh, J. L.; Mitchell, J. B. O.; van Mourik, T.; Fedorov, M. V. First-Principles Calculation of the Intrinsic Aqueous Solubility of Crystalline Druglike Molecules J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 3322-3337
71. Schnieders, M. J.; Baltrusaitis, J.; Shi, Y.; Chattree, G.; Zheng, L.; Yang, W.; Ren, P. The Structure, Thermodynamics, and Solubility of Organic Crystals from Simulation with a Polarizable Force Field J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 1721-1736
72. Campo, M. G. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Glycine Zwitterion in Aqueous Solution J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 114511
73. Hamad, S.; Hughes, C. E.; Catlow, C. R. A.; Harris, K. D. M. Clustering of Glycine Molecules in Aqueous Solution Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulation J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 7280-7288
74. Gnanasambandam, S.; Zhongqiao, H.; Jiang, J.; Rajagopalan, R. Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Studies of Glycine/Water Mixtures in Crystal/Solution Environments J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 752-758
75. Banerjee, S.; Briesen, H. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Glycine Crystal-Solution Interface J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 184705
76. Gnanasambandam, S.; Rajagopalan, R. Growth Morphology of α-Glycine Crystals in Solution Environments: An Extended Interface Structure Analysis Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2010, 12, 1740-1749
77. Cheong, D. W.; Boon, Y. D. Comparative Study of Force Fields for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of α-Glycine Crystal Growth from Solution Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 5146-5158
78. Yani, Y.; Chow, P. S.; Tan, R. B. H. Glycine Open Dimers in Solution: New Insights into α-Glycine Nucleation and Growth Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 4771-4778
79. Neria, E.; Fischer, S.; Karplus, M. Simulation of Activation Free Energies in Molecular Systems J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 1902-1921
80. Lange, O. F.; van der Spoel, D.; de Groot, B. L. Scrutinizing Molecular Mechanics Force Fields on the Submicrosecond Timescale with NMR Data Biophys. J. 2010, 99, 647-655
81. Li, D. W.; Brüschweiler, R. Certification of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories with NMR Chemical Shifts J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 246-248
82. Piana, S.; Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Shaw, D. E. How Robust Are Protein Folding Simulations with Respect to Force Field Parameterization? Biophys. J. 2011, 100, L47-L49
83. Beauchamp, K. A.; Lin, Y- S.; Das, R.; Pande, V. S. Are Protein Force Fields Getting Better? A Systematic Benchmark on 524 Diverse NMR Measurements J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 1409-1414
84. Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Maragakis, P.; Piana, S.; Eastwood, M. P.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E. Systematic Validation of Protein Force Fields against Experimental Data PLoS One 2012, 7 e32131
85. Cino, E. A.; Choy, W. Y.; Karttunen, M. Comparison of Secondary Structure Formation Using 10 Different Force Fields in Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulation J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 2725-2740
86. Yuzlenko, O.; Lazaridis, T. Interactions between Ionizable Amino Acid Side Chains at a Lipid Bilayer-Water Interface J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 13674-13684
87. Geney, R.; Layten, M.; Gomperts, R.; Hornak, V.; Simmerling, C. Investigation of Salt Bridge Stability in a Generalized Born Solvent Model J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006, 2, 115-127
88. Nguyen, H.; Roe, D. R.; Simmerling, C. Improved Generalized Born Solvent Model Parameters for Protein Simulations J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 2020-2034
89. Wassenaar, T. A.; Ingólfsson, H. I.; Priess, M.; Marrink, S. J.; Schäfer, L. V. Mixing MARTINI: Electrostatic Coupling in Hybrid Atomistic-Coarse-Grained Biomolecular Simulations J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 3516-3530
90. De Jong, D. H.; Periole, X.; Marrink, S. J. Dimerization of Amino Acid Side Chains: Lessons from the Comparison of Different Force Fields J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 1003-1014
91. Schreiber, G.; Fersht, A. R. Energetics of Protein-Protein Interactions: Analysis of the Barnase-Barstar Interface by Single Mutations and Double Mutant Cycles J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 248, 478-486
92. Dong, F.; Vijayakumar, M.; Zhou, H.-X. Comparison of Calculation and Experiment Implicates Significant Electrostatic Contributions to the Binding Stability of Barnase and Barstar Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 49-60
93. Dong, F.; Zhou, H.-X. Electrostatic Contributions to the Binding Stability of Protein-Protein Complexes Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2006, 65, 87-102
94. Salari, R.; Chong, L. T. Desolvation Costs of Salt Bridges Across Protein Binding Interfaces: Similarities and Differences between Implicit and Explicit Solvent Models J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2844-2848
95. Salari, R.; Chong, L. T. Effects of High Temperature on Desolvation Costs of Salt Bridges Across Protein Binding Interfaces: Similarities and Differences between Implicit and Explicit Solvent Models J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 2561-2567
96. Elcock, A. H. The Stability of Salt Bridges at High Temperatures: Implications for Hyperthermophilic Proteins J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 284, 489-502
97. Zhu, S.; Elcock, A. H. A Complete Thermodynamic Characterization of Electrostatic and Hydrophobic Associations in the Temperature Range 0-100 C from Explicit-Solvent Molecular Dynamics Simulations J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 1293-1306
98. Reif, M. M.; Hünenberger, P. H.; Oostenbrink, C. New Interaction Parameters for Charged Amino Acid Side Chains in the GROMOS Force Field J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 3705-3723
99. Raschke, T. M.; Tsai, J.; Levitt, M. Quantification of the Hydrophobic Interaction by Simulations of the Aggregation of Small Hydrophobic Solutes in Water Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 5965-5969
100. Ghosh, T.; Garcia, A. E.; Garde, S. Water-Mediated Three-Particle Interactions between Hydrophobic Solutes: Size, Pressure, and Salt Effects J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 612-617
101. Oostenbrink, C.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Methane Clustering in Explicit Water: Effect of Urea on Hydrophobic Interactions Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 53-58
102. Burley, S. K.; Petsko, G. A. Aromatic-Aromatic Interaction: A Mechanism of Protein Structure Stabilization Science 1985, 229, 23-28
103. Hunter, C. A.; Singh, J.; Thornton, J. M. π-π Interactions: The Geometry and Energetics of Phenylalanine-Phenylalanine Interactions in Proteins J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 218, 837-846
104. Bhattacharyya, R.; Samanta, U.; Chakrabarti, P. Aromatic-Aromatic Interactions in and around α-Helices Protein Eng. 2002, 15, 91-100
105. Chakrabarti, P.; Bhattacharyya, R. Geometry of Nonbonded Interactions Involving Planar Groups in Proteins Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2007, 95, 83-137
106. Ploetz, E. A.; Bentenitis, N.; Smith, P. E. Developing Force Fields from the Microscopic Structure of Solutions Fluid Phase Equilib. 2010, 290, 43-47
107. Weerasinghe, S.; Gee, M. B.; Kang, M.; Bentenitis, N.; Smith, P. E. Developing Force Fields From the Microscopic Structure of Solutions: The Kirkwood-Buff Approach. In Modeling Solvent Environments; Feig, M., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2010; pp 55-76.
108. Karunaweera, S.; Gee, M. B.; Weerasinghe, S.; Smith, P. E. Theory and Simulation of Multicomponent Osmotic Systems J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 3493-3503