A brief review of the role of training in near-tool effects

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue SEP, 2013, Pages

  Brown, Liana E ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^b  

^a TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Motor control; Motor learning; Multisensory integration; Peripersonal space; Tools

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885359051     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00576     Document Type: Short Survey

References (75)

1. Arbib, M. A., Bonaiuto, J. B., Jacobs, S., and Frey, S. H. (2009). Tool use and the distalization of the end effector. Psychol. Res. 73, 441-462. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0242-2.
2. Bagesteiro, L. B., and Sainburg, R. L. (2003). Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. J. Neurophys. 90, 1503-1513. doi:10.1152/jn.00189.2003.
3. Bassolino, M., Serino, A., and Ubaldi, S. (2010). Everyday use of the computer mouse extends peripersonal space representation. Neuropsychologia 48, 803-811. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.009.
4. Berti, A., and Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near:remapping of space by tool use. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 415-420. doi:10.1162/089892900562237.
5. Brown, L. E., Doole, R., and Malfait, N. (2011). The role of motor learning in spatial adaptation near a tool. PLoS ONE 6:e28999. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028999.
6. Brozzoli, C., Cardinali, L., Pavani, F., and Farne, A. (2010). Action-specific remapping of peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia 48, 796-802. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.009.
7. Brozzoli, C., Gentile, G., Petkova, V. I., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). FMRI adaptation reveals a cortical mechanism for the coding of space near the hand. J. Neurosci. 31, 9023-9031. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1172-11.2011.
8. Caçola, P., and Gabbard, C. (2012). Modulating peripersonal and extrapersonal reach space via tool use:a comparison between 6-to 12-year-olds and young adults. Exp. Brain Res. 218, 321-330.
9. Caçola, P., Martinez, A., and Ray, C. (2013). The ability to modulate peripersonal and extrapersonal reach space via tool use among the elderly. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 56, 383-388. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2012.08.010.
10. Canzonieri, E., Ubalid, S., Rastelli, V., Finisguerra, A., Bassolino, M., and Serino, A. (2013). Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonal space representations. Exp. Brain Res. 228, 25-42. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3532-2.
11. Cardinali, L., Brozzoli, C., and Farnè, A. (2009a). Peripersonal space and body schema:two labels for the same concept? Brain Topogr. 21, 252-260.
12. Cardinali, L., Frassinetti, F., Brozzoli, C., Urquizar, C., Roy, A. C., and Farnè, A. (2009b). Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Curr. Biol. 19, R478-R479. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.009.
13. Cardinali, L., Jacobs, S., Brozzoli, C., Frassinetti, F., Roy, A. C., and Farnè, A. (2012). Grab an object with a tool and change your body:tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action. Exp. Brain Res. 218, 259-271. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3028-5.
14. Carello, C., Fitzpatrick, P., Flascher, I., and Turvey, M. T. (1998). Inertial eigenvalues, rod density, and rod diameter in length perception by dynamic touch. Percept. Psychophys. 60, 89-100. doi:10.3758/BF03211920.
15. Carello, C., and Turvey, M. T. (2004). Physics and psychology of the muscle sense. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 13, 25-28. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301007.x.
16. Collins, T., Schicke, T., and Roder, B. (2008). Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use. Cognition 109, 363-371. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.001.
17. Davoli, C. C., Brockmole, J. R., and Witt, J. K. (2011). Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use:real, imagined, and remembered. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 38, 80-89. doi:10.1037/a0024981.
18. de Grave, D. D. J., Brenner, E., and Smeets, J. B. J. (2011). Using a stick does not necessarily alter judged distances or reachability. PLoS ONE 6:e16697. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016697.
19. Farnè, A., Bonifazi, S., and Làdavas, E. (2005a). The role played by tool-use and tool-length on the plastic elongation of peri-hand space:a single case study. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22, 408-418. doi:10.1080/02643290442000112.
20. Farnè, A., Iriki, A., and Làdavas, E. (2005b). Shaping multisensory action-space with tools:evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 43, 238-248. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.010.
21. Farnè, A., and Làdavas, E. (2000). Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport 11, 1645-1649. doi:10.1097/00001756-200006050-00010.
22. Farnè, A., Serino, A., and Làdavas, E. (2007). Dynamic size-change of peri-hand space following tool-use:determinants and spatial characteristics revealed through cross-modal extinction. Cortex 43, 436-443. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70468-4.
23. Flanagan, J. R., and Beltzner, M. (2000). Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 737-741. doi:10.1038/76701.
24. Flanagan, J. R., Vetter, P., Johannson, R., and Wolpert, D. (2003). Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Curr. Biol. 13, 146-150. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00007-1.
25. Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Luppino, G., Matelli, M., and Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). J. Neurophysiol. 76, 141-157.
26. Frey, S. H. (2007). What puts the how in where? Tool use and the divided visual streams hypothesis. Cortex 4, 368-375. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70462-3.
27. Gamberini, L., Seraglia, B., and Priftis, K. (2008). Processing of peripersonal and extrapersonal space using tools:evidence from visual line bisection in real and virtual environments. Neuropsychologia 46, 1298-1304. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.016.
28. Gentile, G., Petkova., V. I., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). Integration of visual and tactile signals from the hand in the human brain:an fMRI study. J. Neuropsysiol. 105, 910-922. doi:10.1152/jn.00840.2010.
29. Gozli, D. G., and Brown, L. E. (2011). Agency and control for the integration of a virtual tool into peripersonal space. Perception 40, 1309-1319. doi:10.1068/p7027.
30. Graziano, M. S. A. (1999). Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 10418-10421. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.18.10418.
31. Graziano, M. S. A., and Cooke, D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interaction, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neurospsychologia 44, 845-859. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.009.
32. Graziano, M. S. A., and Gandhi, S. (2000). Location of polysensory zone in the precentral. 35gyrus of anesthetized monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 135, 259-266. doi:10.1007/s002210000518.
33. Graziano, M. S. A., and Gross, C. G. (1993). A bimodal map of space:somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp. Brain Res. 97, 96-109.
34. Graziano, M. S. A., Reiss, L. A. J., and Gross, C. G. (1999). A neuronal representation of the location of nearby sounds. Nature 397, 428-430. doi:10.1038/17115.
35. Graziano, M. S. A., Yap, G. S., and Gross, C. G. (1994). Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science 266, 1054-1057. doi:10.1126/science.7973661.
36. Gribble, P. L., and Ostry, D. J. (1999). Compensation for interaction torques during single-and multijoint limb movements. J. Neurophysiol. 82, 2310-2326.
37. Haruno, M., Wolpert, D. M., and Kawato, M. (2001). Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput. 13, 2201-2220. doi:10.1162/089976601750541778.
38. Holmes, N. P., Calvert, G. A., and Spence, C. (2007a). Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds:evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Exp. Brain Res. 183, 465-476. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1060-7.
39. Holmes, N. P., Sanabria, D., Calvert, G. A., and Spence, C. (2007b). Tool-use:capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space? Cortex 43, 469-489.
40. Holmes, N. P., Spence, C., Hansen, P. C., Mackay, C. E., and Calvert, G. A. (2008). The multisensory attentional consequences of tool use:a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. PLoS ONE 3:e3502. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003502.
41. Imamizu, H., Higuchi, S., Toda, A., and Kawato, M. (2007). Reorganization of brain activity for multiple internal models after short but intensive training. Cortex 43, 338-349. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70459-3.
42. Iriki, M., Tanaka, M., and Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7, 2325-2330. doi:10.1097/00001756-199610020-00010.
43. Iwamura, Y., Tanaka, M., Sakomoto, M., and Hikosaka, O. (1993). Rostrocaudal gradients in the neuronal receptive field complexity in the finger region of the alert monkey's postcentral gyrus. Exp. Brain Res. 92, 360-368.
44. Kao, C., and Goodale, M. A. (2009). Enhanced detection of visual targets on the hand and familiar tools. Neuropsychologia 47, 2454-2463. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.04.016.
45. Làdavas, E., and Serino, A. (2008). Action-dependent plasticity in peripersonal space representations. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 25, 1099-1113. doi:10.1080/02643290802359113.
46. Longo, M. R., and Haggard, P. (2009). Sense of agency primes manual motor responses. Perception 38, 69-78. doi:10.1068/p6045.
47. Longo, M. R., and Lourenco, S. F. (2006). On the nature of near space:effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia 44, 977-981. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.003.
48. Magosso, E., Ursino, M., di Pellegrino, G., Làdavas, E., and Serino, A. (2010). Neural bases of peri-hand space plasticity through tool-use:insights from a combined computational-experimental approach. Neuropsychologia 48, 812-830. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.037.
49. Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., Brozzoli, C., and Farne, A. (2012). Keeping the world at hand:rapid visuomotor processing for hand-object interactions. Exp. Brain Res. 219, 421-428. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3089-5.
50. Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., and Zohary, E. (2007). Is that near my hand? Multisensory Representations of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 27, 731-740. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-06.2007.
51. Maravita, A., Clarke, K., Husain, M., and Driver, J. (2002). Active tool use with the contralesional hand can reduce cross-modal extinction of touch on that hand. Neurocase 8, 411-416. doi:10.1093/neucas/8.6.411.
52. Maravita, A., Husain, M., Clarke, K., and Driver, J. (2001). Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space:evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 39, 580-585. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00150-0.
53. Maravita, A., and Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 79-86. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.008.
54. Massen, C., and Prinz, W. (2009). Movements, actions and tool-use actions:an ideomotor approach to imitation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364, 2349-2358. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0059.
55. Nahab, F. B., Kundu, P., Gallea, C., Kakareka, J., Pursley, R., Pohida, T., et al. (2011). The neural processes underlying self-agency. Cereb. Cortex 21, 48-55. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq059.
56. Obayashi, S., Tanaka, M., and Iriki, A. (2000). Subjective image of invisible hand coded by monkey intraparietal neurons. Neuroreport 11, 3499-3505. doi:10.1097/00001756-200011090-00020.
57. Osiurak, F., Morgado, N., and Palluel-Germain, R. (2012). Tool use and perceived distance:when unreachable becomes spontaneously reachable. Exp. Brain Res. 218, 331-339. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3036-5.
58. Pegna, A. J., Petit, L., Caldara-Schnetzer, A.-S., Khateb, A., Annoni, J.-M., Szrajzel, R., et al. (2001). So near yet so far:neglect in far or near space depends on tool use. Ann. Neurol. 50, 820-822. doi:10.1002/ana.10058.
59. Reed, C. L., Betz, R., Garza, J. P., and Roberts, R. J. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attn. Percept. Psychophys. 72, 236-245. doi:10.3758/APP.72.1.236.
60. Rizzolatti, G., Scandolara, C., Matelli, M., and Gentilucci, M. (1981a). Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. I. Somatosensory responses. Behav. Brain Res. 2, 126-146.
61. Rizzolatti, G., Scandolara, C., Matelli, M., and Gentilucci, M. (1981b). Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses. Behav. Brain Res. 2, 147-163. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(81)90053-X.
62. Sainburg, R. L., Ghez, C., and Kalakanis, D. (1999). Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 1045-1056.
63. Sainburg, R. L., Ghilardi, F., Poizner, H., and Ghez, C. (1995). Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. J. Neurophysiol. 73, 820-835.
64. Schlack, A., Sterbing D'Angelo, S. J., Hartung, K., Hoffmann, K.-P., and Brenner, F. (2005). Multisensory space representations in the macaque ventral intraparietal area. J. Neurosci. 25, 4616-4625. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0455-05.2005.
65. Sengül, A., van Elk, M., Rognini, G., Aspell, J. E., Bleuler, H., and Blanke, O. (2012). Extending the body to virtual tools using a robotic surgical interface:evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. PLoS ONE 7:e49473. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049473.
66. Seraglia, B., Priftis, K., Cutini, S., and Gamberini, L. (2012). How tool use and arm position affect peripersonal space representation. Cogn. Process. 13, S325-S328. doi:10.1007/s10339-10012-0458-8.
67. Serino, A., Bassolino, M., Farnè, A., and Làdavas, E. (2007). Extended multisensory ppace in blind cane users. Psychol. Sci. 18, 642-648. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01952.x.
68. Shimada, S., Hiraki, K., and Oda, I. (2005). The parietal role in the sense of self-ownership with temporal discrepancy between visual and proprioceptive feedbacks. Neuroimage 24, 1225-1232. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.039.
69. Short, F., and Ward, R. (2009). Virtual limbs and body space:critical features for the distinction between body space and near-body space. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 35, 102-103. doi:10.1037/a0015873.
70. Sposito, A., Bolognini, N., Vallar, G., and Maravita, A. (2012). Extension of perceived arm length following tool-use:clues to plasticity of body metrics. Neuropsychologia 50, 2187-2194. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.022.
71. Wang, J., and Sainburg, R. L. (2004). Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 349-360. doi:10.1152/jn.00960.2003.
72. Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1, 209-216. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01070-X.
73. Wolpert, D. M., and Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 11, 1317-1329. doi:10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00066-5.
74. Witt, J. K. (2011). Tool use influences perceived shape and perceived parallelism, which serve as indirect measures of perceived distance. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 1148-1156. doi:10.1037/a0021933.
75. Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R., and Epstein, W. (2005). Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 880-888. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.880.