Grab an object with a tool and change your body: Tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 218, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 259-271

  Cardinali, Lucilla ^a,b,c   Jacobs, Stéphane ^a,b,c   Brozzoli, Claudio ^d   Frassinetti, Francesca ^e,f   Roy, Alice C ^b,g   Farnè, Alessandro ^a,b,c  

^a LYON NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c HÔPITAL NEUROLOGIQUE   (France)

^d KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^f IRCCS   (Italy)

^g INSTITUT DES SCIENCES COGNITIVES   (France)

Author keywords

Action; Body schema; Kinematic; Perception; Tool use

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION;

ADULT; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84862904667     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3028-5     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Arbib MA, Bonaiuto JB, Jacobs S, Frey S (2009) Tool use and the distalization of the end-effector. Psychol Res 73(4):441-462
2. Beck B (1980) Animal tool behavior: the use and manufacture of tools by animals. Garland STPM Press, New York
3. Berti A, Frassinetti F (2000) When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use. J Cogn Neurosci 12(3):415-420 (Pubitemid 30410282)
4. Bhushan N, Shadmehr R (1999) Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields. Biol Cybern 81:39-60 (Pubitemid 129543166)
5. Bonda E, Petrides M, Frey S, Evans A (1995) Neural correlates of mental transformations of the body-in-space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(24):11180-11184
6. Brown LE, Doole R, Malfait N (2011) The role of motor learning in spatial adaptation near a tool. PLoS ONE 6:e28999. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028999
7. Brozzoli C, Gentile G, Petkova V, Ehrsson H (2011) fMRI adaptation reveals a cortical mechanism for the coding of space near the hand. J Neurosci 31(24):9023-9031
8. Buxbaum LJ, Giovannetti T, Libon D (2000) The role of the dynamic body schema in praxis: evidence from primary progressive apraxia. Brain Cogn 44(2):166-191
9. Cardinali L, Brozzoli C, Farnè A (2009a) Peripersonal space and body schema: two labels for the same concept? Brain Topogr 21(3-4): 252-260
10. Cardinali L, Frassinetti F, Brozzoli C, Urquizar C, Roy A, Farnè A (2009b) Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Current Biol 19(12):R478-R479
11. Cardinali L, Brozzoli C, Urquizar C, Salemme R, Roy AC, Farnè A (2011) When action is not enough: tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to Body Schema. Neuropsychologia 49(13):3750-3757. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia. 2011.09.033
12. Chieffi S, Gentilucci M (1993) Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 94:471-477 (Pubitemid 23218104)
13. Coello Y, Bartolo A, Amiri B, Devanne H, Houdayer E, Derambure P, Robertson E (2008) Perceiving what is reachable depends on motor representations: evidence from a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. PLoS ONE 3(8):e2862
14. Corradi-Dell'acqua C, Tomasino B, Fink G (2009) What is the position of an arm relative to the body? Neural correlates of Body Schema and body structural description. J Neurosci 29(13):4162-4171
15. Costantini M, Ambrosini E, Sinigaglia C, Gallese V (2011) Tool-use observation makes far objects ready-to-hand. Neuropsychologia 49:2658-2663. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.013
16. de Vignemont F (2010) Body schema and body image - pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 48(3):669-680
17. di Pellegrino G, Làdavas E, Farnè A (1997) Seeing where your hands are. Nature 388(6644):730 (Pubitemid 27375145)
18. Diedrichsen J, Hashambhoy Y, Rane T, Shadmehr R (2005) Neural correlates of reach errors. J Neurosci 25:9919-9931. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1874-05.2005 (Pubitemid 41528030)
19. Dijkerman H, De Haan E (2007) Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behav Brain Sci 30(02):189
20. Farnè A, Làdavas E (2002) Auditory peripersonal space in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 14:1030-1043. doi:10.1162/089892902320474481
21. Farnè A, Pavani F, Meneghello F, Làdavas E (2000) Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain 123(Pt 11):2350-2360
22. Farnè A, Iriki A, Làdavas E (2005) Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 43(2):238-248 (Pubitemid 40222143)
23. Farnè A, Serino A, Làdavas E (2007) Dynamic size-change of perihand space following tool-use: determinants and spatial characteristics revealed through cross-modal extinction. CORTEX 43:436-443 (Pubitemid 46729977)
24. Ferri F, Frassinetti F, Costantini M, Gallese V (2011) Motor simulation and the bodily self. PLoS ONE 6(3):e17927. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0017927
25. Fourneret P, Jeannerod M (1998) Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 36:1133-1140 (Pubitemid 28529533)
26. Gallivan J, Cavina-Pratesi C, Culham JC (2009) Is that within reach? fMRI reveals that the human superior parieto-occipital cortex encodes objects reachable by the hand. J Neurosci 29(14):4381-4391
27. Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Scarpa M, Castiello U (1992) Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effiects of visual perturbation. Behav Brain Res 47(1):71-82
28. Gentilucci M, Roy A, Stefanini S (2004) Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: are these tasks guided by a common motor representation? Exp Brain Res 157:1-11. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1863-8
29. Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15(1):20-25
30. Goodale MA, Meenan JP, Bülthoff HH, Nicolle DA, Murphy KJ, Racicot CI (1994) Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr Biol 4(7):604-610
31. Greenwald AG (1970) Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychol Rev 77:73-99
32. Haaland KY, Harrington DL, Knight RT (2000) Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain 123(Pt 11):2306-2313
33. Head H, Holmes G (1911) Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain 34(2-3):102
34. Hermsdörfer J, Terlinden G, Mühlau M, Goldenberg G, Wohlschläger AM (2007) Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: evidence from an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 36(Suppl 2):T109-T118 (Pubitemid 46702733)
35. Holmes N, Sanabria D, Calvert G, Spence C (2007) Tool-use: capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space? Cortex 43(3):469-489 (Pubitemid 46729978)
36. Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849-878 (discussion 878-937) (Pubitemid 34965924)
37. Imazu S, Sugio T, Tanaka S, Inui T (2007) Differences between actual and imagined usage of chopsticks: an fMRI study. Cortex 43(3):301-307 (Pubitemid 46744677)
38. Inoue K, Kawashima R, Sugiura M, Ogawa A, Schormann T, Zilles K, Fukuda H (2001) Activation in the ipsilateral posterior parietal cortex during tool use: a PET study. NeuroImage 14(6):1469-1475 (Pubitemid 33124195)
39. Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7(14):2325-2330 (Pubitemid 26377790)
40. Ishibashi H, Hihara S, Iriki A (2000) Acquisition and development of monkey tool-use: behavioral and kinematic analyses. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 78(11):958-966
41. Jacobs S, Bussel B, Combeaud M, Roby-Brami A (2009) The use of a tool requires its incorporation into the movement: evidence from stick-pointing in apraxia. Cortex 45(4):444-455
42. Jacobs S, Danielmeier C, Frey SH (2010) Human anterior intraparietal and ventral premotor cortices support representations of grasping with the hand or a novel tool. J Cogn Neurosci 22(11):2594-2608. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21372
43. Jacobs S, Brozzoli C, Hadj-Bouziane F, Meunier M, Farnè A (2011) Studying multisensory processing and its role in the representation of space through pathological and physiological crossmodal extinction. Front Psychol 2:1-9
44. James TW, Culham J, Humphrey GK, Milner AD, Goodale MA (2003) Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. Brain 126(Pt 11):2463-2475 (Pubitemid 37314436)
45. Johnson SH (2000) Thinking ahead: the case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension. Cognition 74(1):33-70
46. Johnson-Frey S (2003a) What's so special about human tool use? Neuron 39(2):201-204 (Pubitemid 36897543)
47. Johnson-Frey SH (2003b) What's so special about human tool use? Neuron 39:201-204 (Pubitemid 36897543)
48. Johnson-Frey S (2004) The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends Cogn Sci 8(2):71-78 (Pubitemid 38169478)
49. Kammers MP, de Vignemont F, Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC (2009) The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 47(1):204-211
50. Kammers M, Kootker J, Hogendoorn H, Dijkerman H (2010) How many motoric body representations can we grasp? Exp Brain Res 202(1):203-212
51. Kudoh N, Hattori M, Numata N, Maruyama K (1997) An analysis of spatiotemporal variability during prehension movements: effects of object size and distance. Exp Brain Res 117(3):457-464 (Pubitemid 27520516)
52. Ladwig S, Sutter C, Müsseler J (2012) Crosstalk between proximal and distal action effects during tool use. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 220:10-15
53. Lewis JW (2006) Cortical networks related to human use of tools. Neuroscientist 12(3):211-231 (Pubitemid 43725832)
54. Lindshield S, Rodrigues M (2009) Tool use in wild spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Primates 50(3):269-272
55. Longo MR, Haggard P (2010) An implicit body representation underlying human position sense. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(26):11727-11732
56. Macellini S, Maranesi M, Bonini L, Simone L, Rozzi S, Ferrari PF, Fogassi L (2012) Individual and social learning processes involved in the acquisition and generalization of tool use in macaques. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 367(1585):24-36
57. Maravita A, Husain M, Clarke K, Driver J (2001) Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 39(6):580-585 (Pubitemid 32197529)
58. Maravita A, Clarke K, Husain M, Driver J (2002a) Active tool use with the contralesional hand can reduce cross-modal extinction of touch on that hand. Neurocase 8(6):411-416 (Pubitemid 36187654)
59. Maravita A, Spence C, Kennett S, Driver J (2002b) Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 83(2):B25-B34 (Pubitemid 34175123)
60. Massen C, Prinz W (2009) Movements, actions and tool-use actions: an ideomotor approach to imitation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:2349-2358. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0059
61. McCormack T, Hoerl C, Butterfill S (2011) Tool use and causal cognition. Oxford University Press, USA
62. Milner AD, Goodale MA (2008) Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 46(3):774-785 (Pubitemid 351255549)
63. Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG (1982) Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys. Behav Brain Res 6(1):57-77 (Pubitemid 12007158)
64. Mountcastle VB, Lynch JC, Georgopoulos A, Sakata H, Acuna C (1975) Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: command functions for operations within extrapersonal space. J Neurophysiol 38(4):871-908
65. Newport R, Pearce R, Preston C (2010) Fake hands in action: embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Exp Brain Res 204(3):385-395
66. Obayashi S, Suhara T, Kawabe K, Okauchi T, Maeda J, Akine Y, Onoe H, Iriki A (2001) Functional brain mapping of monkey tool use. NeuroImage 14(4):853-861. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0878 (Pubitemid 32929886)
67. Ostry DJ, Darainy M, Mattar AAG et al (2010) Somatosensory plasticity and motor learning. J Neurosci 30:5384-5393. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4571-09.2010
68. Paillard J (1999) Body schema and body image - a double dissociation in deafferented patients. In: Gantchev GN, Mori S, Massion J (eds) Motor control, today and tomorrow. Academic publishing house, Sophia, pp 197-214
69. Parkinson A, Condon L, Jackson SR (2010) Parietal cortex coding of limb posture: in search of the body-schema. Neuropsychologia 48(11):3228-3234. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.039
70. Parsons LM (1987) Imagined spatial transformation of one's body. J Exp Psychol Gen 116(2):172-191
71. Parsons LM, Fox PT, Downs JH, Glass T, Hirsch TB, Martin CC, Jerabek PA, Lancaster JL (1995) Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature 375(6526):54-58. doi:10.1038/375054a0
72. Pellijeff A, Bonilha L, Morgan PS, McKenzie K, Jackson SR (2006) Parietal updating of limb posture: an event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 44(13):2685-2690 (Pubitemid 44511951)
73. Povinelli DJ, Reaux JE, Frey SH (2010) Chimpanzees' context-dependent tool use provides evidence for separable representations of hand and tool even during active use within peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia 48(1):243-247
74. Rieger M, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2005) Compensation for and adaptation to changes in the environment. Exp Brain Res 163:487-502. doi:10.1007/s00221-004- 2203-8 (Pubitemid 40848195)
75. Rossetti Y, Rode G, Boisson D (1995) Implicit processing of somaesthetic information: a dissociation between where and how? NeuroReport 6(3):506-510
76. Rossetti Y, Rode G, Boisson D (2001) Numbsense: a case study and implications. In: De Gelder B, De Haan E, Heywood C (eds) Out of mind: varieties of unconscious processing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 265-292
77. Sakata H, Takaoka Y, Kawarasaki A, Shibutani H (1973) Somatosensory properties of neurons in the superior parietal cortex (area 5) of the rhesus monkey. Brain Res 64:85-102
78. Schwoebel J, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB (2004) Representations of the human body in the production and imitation of complex movements. Cogn Neuropsychol 21(2):285-298 (Pubitemid 38455590)
79. Serino A, Bassolino M, Farnè A, Làdavas E (2007) Extended multisen-sory space in blind cane users. Psychol Sci 18(7):642-648
80. Sutter C, Müsseler J, Bardos L, Ballagas R, Borchers J (2008) The impact of gain change on perceiving one's own actions. In: Herczeg M, Kindsmüller MC (eds) Mensch & computer. Olden-bourg Wissenschaftsverlag, Munic, pp 147-156
81. Takahashi C, Diedrichsen J, Watt SJ (2009) Integration of vision and haptics during tool use. JOV 9(3):1-13. doi:10.1167/9.6.3
82. Tsuda H, Aoki T, Oku N, Kimura Y, Hatazawa J, Kinoshita H (2009) Functional brain areas associated with manipulation of a prehensile tool: a PET study. Hum Brain Mapp 30(9):2879-2889. doi:10.1002/hbm.20715
83. van der Steen MC, Bongers RM (2011) Joint angle variability and co-variation in a reaching with a rod task. Exp Brain Res 208(3):411-422
84. Witt J, Proffitt DR, Epstein W (2005) Tool use affiects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. J Exp Psychol 31(5):880-888 (Pubitemid 41653557)
85. Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2010) Motor learning. Curr Biol 20:R467- R472. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.035
86. Wolpert DM, Goodbody SJ, Husain M (1998) Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nat Neurosci 1(6):529-533