Extending the Body to Virtual Tools Using a Robotic Surgical Interface: Evidence from the Crossmodal Congruency Task

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2012, Pages

  Sengül, Ali ^a   van Elk, Michiel ^a   Rognini, Giulio ^a   Aspell, Jane Elizabeth ^a   Bleuler, Hannes ^a   Blanke, Olaf ^a,b  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CROSSMODAL CONGRUENCY EFFECT; EXPERIMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ROBOTICS; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOOL USE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870856108     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049473     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Iriki ATM, (in press) Triadic (ecological, neural, cognitive) niche construction: a scenario of human brain evolution extrapolating tool-use and language from the control of reaching actions. Phil Trans R Soc B.
2. Ishibashi H, Hihara S, Iriki A, (2000) Acquisition and development of monkey tool-use: behavioral and kinematic analyses. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 78: 958-966.
3. Goldenberg G, Spatt J, (2009) The neural basis of tool use. Brain 132: 1645-1655.
4. Peeters R, Simone L, Nelissen K, Fabbri-Destro M, Vanduffel W, et al. (2009) The Representation of Tool Use in Humans and Monkeys: Common and Uniquely Human Features. J Neurosci 29: 11523-11539.
5. Holmes NP, Calvert GA, Spence C (2006) Beyond the body: visual, prosthetic and technological contributions to bodily perception and awareness; In: Knoblich GT, I.M.; Grosjean, M.; Shiffrar, M., editor. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
6. Holmes NP, Sanabria D, Calvert GA, Spence C, (2007) Tool-use: Capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space? Cortex 43: 469-489.
7. Maravita A, Iriki A, (2004) Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn Sci 8: 79-86.
8. Maravita A, Spence C, Kennett S, Driver J, (2002) Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 83: B25-B34.
9. Bassolino M, Serino A, Ubaldi S, Ladavas E, (2010) Everyday use of the computer mouse extends peripersonal space representation. Neuropsychologia 48: 803-811.
10. Iriki A, Tanaka M, Obayashi S, Iwamura Y, (2001) Self-images in the video monitor coded by monkey intraparietal neurons. Neurosci Res 40: 163-173.
11. Rosen J, Hannaford B, Satava R (2011) Surgical Robotics: Systems Applications and Visions. London: Springer.
12. Suematsu Y, del Nido PJ, (2004) Robotic pediatric cardiac surgery: present and future perspectives. Am J Surg 188: 98S-103S.
13. Stone R. Haptic feedback: A potted history, from telepresence to virtual reality. 2000; Glasgow, UK, 1-7. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
14. Kenngott HG, Fischer L, Nickel F, Rom J, Rassweiler J, et al. (2012) Status of robotic assistance-a less traumatic and more accurate minimally invasive surgery? Langenbeck Arch Surg 397: 333-341.
15. Rassweiler J, Safi KC, Subotic S, Teber D, Frede T, (2005) Robotics and telesurgery-an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14: 109-122.
16. Tavakoli M, Aziminejad A, Patel RV, Moallem M, (2007) High-fidelity bilateral teleoperation systems and the effect of multimodal haptics. Ieee Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics 37: 1512-1528.
17. Octavia JR, Raymaekers C, Coninx K, (2011) Adaptation in virtual environments: conceptual framework and user models. Multimed Tools Appl 54: 121-142.
18. Ladavas E, Serino A, (2008) Action-dependent plasticity in peripersonal space representations. Cogn Neuropsychol 25: 1099-1113.
19. Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y, (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7: 2325-2330.
20. Maravita A (2006) From body in the brain, to body in space: sensory and intentional aspects of body representation; Grosjean IGKMSM, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Maravita A, Iriki A, (2004) Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 79-86.
22. Holmes NP, (2012) Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis. Experimental Brain Research 218: 273-282.
23. Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J, (2000) Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol Sci 11: 353-359.
24. Zopf R, Savage G, Williams MA, (2010) Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia 48: 713-725.
25. Aspell JE, Lenggenhager B, Blanke O, (2009) Keeping in touch with one's self: multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness. PLoS One 4: e6488.
26. Rognini G, Sengül A, Aspell JE, Bleuler H, Blanke O, (2012) Visuo-tactile integration and body ownership during self-generated action. Eur J Neurosci (in revision).
27. Shore DI, Barnes ME, Spence C, (2006) Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect. Neurosci Lett 392: 96-100.
28. Farne A, Iriki A, Ladavas E, (2005) Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 43: 238-248.
29. Holmes NP, Calvert GA, Spence C, (2004) Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neuroscience Letters 372: 62-67.
30. Moizumi S, Yamamoto S, Kitazawa S, (2007) Referral of tactile stimuli to action points in virtual reality with reaction force. Neuroscience Research 59: 60-67.
31. Lee EC, Rafiq A, Merrell R, Ackerman R, Dennerlein JT, (2005) Ergonomics and human factors in endoscopic surgery: a comparison of manual vs telerobotic simulation systems. Surg Endosc 19: 1064-1070.
32. Prasad SM, Maniar HS, Soper NJ, Damiano RJ, Klingensmith ME, (2002) The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 183: 702-707.
33. Santos-Carreras L, Hagen M, Gassert R, Bleuler H, (2011) Survey on Surgical Instrument Handle Design: Ergonomics and Acceptance. Surg Innov.
34. Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N, (2006) Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency. Surg Endosc 20: 96-103.
35. Okamura AM, (2009) Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Curr Opin Urol 19: 102-107.
36. Santos-Carreras LB, Sengül A, Gassert R, Bleuler H, (2010) Influence of force and torque feedback on operator performance in a VR-based suturing task. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics pp. 217-230.