Language

Handbook of Clinical Neurology

Volumn 116, Issue , 2013, Pages 681-691

  Cattaneo, Luigi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Arcuate fasciculus; Brain mapping; Broca's area; Language; Neurophysiology; Phonology; Speech; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Wernicke's area

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; ARCUATE FASCICULUS; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; DIAGONAL BAND OF BROCA; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MEMORY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; WERNICKE AREA;

APHASIA; ARCUATE FASCICULUS; BRAIN MAPPING; BROCA'S AREA; LANGUAGE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PHONOLOGY; SPEECH; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; WERNICKE'S AREA;

CEREBRAL CORTEX; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MEMORY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 84885161584     PISSN: 00729752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00054-1     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Acheson D.J., Hamidi M., Binder J.R., et al. A common neural substrate for language production and verbal working memory. J Cogn Neurosci 2011, 23:1358-1367.
2. Alba-Ferrara L., Ellison A., Mitchell R.L. Decoding emotional prosody: resolving differences in functional neuroanatomy from fMRI and lesion studies using TMS. Brain Stimul 2012, 5:347-353.
3. Amassian V.E., Cracco R.Q., MacCabee P.J., et al. Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989, 74:458-462.
4. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 5: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 23:107-110.
5. Andoh J., Artiges E., Pallier C., et al. Modulation of language areas with functional MR image-guided magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 2006, 29:619-627.
6. Argyropoulos G.P. Cerebellar theta-burst stimulation selectively enhances lexical associative priming. Cerebellum 2011, 10:540-550.
7. Argyropoulos G.P., Kimiskidis V.K., Papagiannopoulos S. Theta-burst stimulation of the right neocerebellar vermis selectively disrupts the practice-induced acceleration of lexical decisions. Behav Neurosci 2011, 125:724-734.
8. Aziz-Zadeh L., Cattaneo L., Rochat M., et al. Covert speech arrest induced by rTMS over both motor and nonmotor left hemisphere frontal sites. J Cogn Neurosci 2005, 17:928-938.
9. Baddeley A. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003, 4:829-839.
10. Bedny M., Caramazza A. Perception, action, and word meanings in the human brain: the case from action verbs. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011, 1224:81-95.
11. Ben-Shachar M., Dougherty R.F., Wandell B.A. White matter pathways in reading. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2007, 17:258-270.
12. Boatman D. Cortical bases of speech perception: evidence from functional lesion studies. Cognition 2004, 92:47-65.
13. Braet W., Humphreys G.W. Case mixing and the right parietal cortex: evidence from rTMS. Exp Brain Res 2006, 168:265-271.
14. Cappa S.F., Sandrini M., Rossini P.M., et al. The role of the left frontal lobe in action naming: rTMS evidence. Neurology 2002, 59:720-723.
15. Cappelletti M., Fregni F., Shapiro K., et al. Processing nouns and verbs in the left frontal cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Cogn Neurosci 2008, 20:707-720.
16. Caramazza A., Hillis A.E. Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature 1991, 349:788-790.
17. Cattaneo Z., Rota F., Vecchi T., et al. Using state-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate letter selectivity in the left posterior parietal cortex: a comparison of TMS-priming and TMS-adaptation paradigms. Eur J Neurosci 2008, 28:1924-1929.
18. Cattaneo Z., Rota F., Walsh V., et al. TMS-adaptation reveals abstract letter selectivity in the left posterior parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2009, 19:2321-2325.
19. Chouinard P.A., Whitwell R.L., Goodale M.A. The lateral-occipital and the inferior-frontal cortex play different roles during the naming of visually presented objects. Hum Brain Mapp 2009, 30:3851-3864.
20. Claus D., Weis M., Treig T., et al. Influence of repetitive magnetic stimuli on verbal comprehension. J Neurol 1993, 240:149-150.
21. Cohen L.G., Celnik P., Pascual-Leone A., et al. Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature 1997, 389:180-183.
22. D'Ausilio A., Pulvermuller F., Salmas P., et al. The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Curr Biol 2009, 19:381-385.
23. D'Ausilio A., Bufalari I., Salmas P., et al. The role of the motor system in discriminating normal and degraded speech sounds. Cortex 2012, 48:882-887.
24. Dehaene S., Cohen L. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends Cogn Sci 2011, 15:254-262.
25. Dejerine J. Contribution à l'étude anatomo-pathologique et clinique des différentes variétés de cécité verbale. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 1892, 44:61-90.
26. Desmond J.E., Chen S.H., Shieh P.B. Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation impairs verbal working memory. Ann Neurol 2005, 58:553-560.
27. Devlin J.T., Matthews P.M., Rushworth M.F. Semantic processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Cogn Neurosci 2003, 15:71-84.
28. Drager B., Breitenstein C., Helmke U., et al. Specific and nonspecific effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on picture-word verification. Eur J Neurosci 2004, 20:1681-1687.
29. Duncan K.J., Pattamadilok C., Devlin J.T. Investigating occipito-temporal contributions to reading with TMS. J Cogn Neurosci 2010, 22:739-750.
30. Epstein C.M., Lah J.J., Meadow K., et al. Optimum stimulus parameters for lateralized suppression of speech with magnetic brain stimulation. Neurology 1996, 47:1590-1593.
31. Epstein C.M., Meador K.J., Loring D.W., et al. Localization and characterization of speech arrest during transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 110:1073-1079.
32. Epstein C.M., Woodard J.L., Stringer A.Y., et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not replicate the Wada test. Neurology 2000, 55:1025-1027.
33. Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., et al. Visuomotor neurons: ambiguity of the discharge or 'motor' perception?. Int J Psychophysiol 2000, 35:165-177.
34. Fadiga L., Craighero L., Buccino G., et al. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur J Neurosci 2002, 15:399-402.
35. Flitman S.S., Grafman J., Wassermann E.M., et al. Linguistic processing during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1998, 50:175-181.
36. Fogliata A., Rizzo S., Reati F., et al. The time course of idiom processing. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:3215-3222.
37. Gough P.M., Nobre A.C., Devlin J.T. Dissociating linguistic processes in the left inferior frontal cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci 2005, 25:8010-8016.
38. Grodzinsky Y., Friederici A.D. Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2006, 16:240-246.
39. Hartwigsen G., Baumgaertner A., Price C.J., et al. Phonological decisions require both the left and right supramarginal gyri. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:16494-16499.
40. Hartwigsen G., Price C.J., Baumgaertner A., et al. The right posterior inferior frontal gyrus contributes to phonological word decisions in the healthy brain: evidence from dual-site TMS. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3155-3163.
41. Herwig U., Abler B., Schonfeldt-Lecuona C., et al. Verbal storage in a premotor-parietal network: evidence from fMRI-guided magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 2003, 20:1032-1041.
42. Hoekert M., Bais L., Kahn R.S., et al. Time course of the involvement of the right anterior superior temporal gyrus and the right fronto-parietal operculum in emotional prosody perception. PLoS One 2008, 3:e2244.
43. Hoekert M., Vingerhoets G., Aleman A. Results of a pilot study on the involvement of bilateral inferior frontal gyri in emotional prosody perception: an rTMS study. BMC Neurosci 2010, 11:93.
44. Jennum P., Friberg L., Fuglsang-Frederiksen A., et al. Speech localization using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1994, 44:269-273.
45. Kastner S., Demmer I., Ziemann U. Transient visual field defects induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over human occipital pole. Exp Brain Res 1998, 118:19-26.
46. Kirschen M.P., Davis-Ratner M.S., Jerde T.E., et al. Enhancement of phonological memory following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Behav Neurol 2006, 17:187-194.
47. Knecht S., Floel A., Drager B., et al. Degree of language lateralization determines susceptibility to unilateral brain lesions. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5:695-699.
48. Lavidor M., Walsh V. A magnetic stimulation examination of orthographic neighborhood effects in visual word recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 2003, 15:354-363.
49. Leff A.P., Scott S.K., Rothwell J.C., et al. The planning and guiding of reading saccades: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex 2001, 11:918-923.
50. Liederman J., McGraw Fisher J., Schulz M., et al. The role of motion direction selective extrastriate regions in reading: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain Lang 2003, 85:140-155.
51. Lo Gerfo E., Oliveri M., Torriero S., et al. The influence of rTMS over prefrontal and motor areas in a morphological task: grammatical vs. semantic effects. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:764-770.
52. Manenti R., Caooa S.F., Rossini P.M., et al. The role of the prefrontal cortex in sentence comprehension: an rTMS study. Cortex 2008, 44:337-344.
53. Martin A. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu Rev Psychol 2007, 58:25-45.
54. McCandliss B.D., Cohen L., Dehaeme S. The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends Cogn Sci 2003, 7:293-299.
55. Meister I.G., Wilson S.M., Deblieck C., et al. The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Curr Biol 2007, 17:1692-1696.
56. Mottaghy F.M., Hungs M., Brugmann M., et al. Facilitation of picture naming after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1999, 53:1806-1812.
57. Mottonen R., Watkins K.E. Motor representations of articulators contribute to categorical perception of speech sounds. J Neurosci 2009, 29:9819-9825.
58. Murakami T., Restle J., Ziemann U. Observation-execution matching and action inhibition in human primary motor cortex during viewing of speech-related lip movements or listening to speech. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:2045-2054.
59. Nixon P., Lazarova J., Hodinott-Hill I., et al. The inferior frontal gyrus and phonological processing: an investigation using rTMS. J Cogn Neurosci 2004, 16:289-300.
60. Okamoto M., Dan H., Sakamoto K., et al. Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10-20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping. Neuroimage 2004, 21:99-111.
61. Oliveri M., Romero L., Papagno C. Left but not right temporal involvement in opaque idiom comprehension: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Cogn Neurosci 2004, 16:848-855.
62. Oliveri M., Bonni S., Turriziani P., et al. Motor and linguistic linking of space and time in the cerebellum. PLoS One 2009, 4:e7933.
63. Papagno C., Fogliata A., Catricala E., et al. The lexical processing of abstract and concrete nouns. Brain Res 2009, 1263:78-86.
64. Parker G.J., Luzzi S., Alexander D.C., et al. Lateralization of ventral and dorsal auditory-language pathways in the human brain. Neuroimage 2005, 24:656-666.
65. Pascual-Leone A., Gates J.R., Dhuna A. Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1991, 41:697-702.
66. Pattamadilok C., Knierim I.N., Kawabata Duncan K.J., et al. How does learning to read affect speech perception?. J Neurosci 2010, 30:8435-8444.
67. Pobric G., Jefferies E., Lambon Ralph M.A. Anterior temporal lobes mediate semantic representation: mimicking semantic dementia by using rTMS in normal participants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:20137-20141.
68. Pobric G., Mashal N., Faust M., et al. The role of the right cerebral hemisphere in processing novel metaphoric expressions: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Cogn Neurosci 2008, 20:170-181.
69. Pobric G., Jefferies E., Lambon Ralph M.A. Category-specific versus category-general semantic impairment induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Curr Biol 2010, 20:964-968.
70. Price C.J., Devlin J.T. The myth of the visual word form area. Neuroimage 2003, 19:473-481.
71. Price C.J., Mechelli A. Reading and reading disturbance. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005, 15:231-238.
72. Rizzo S., Sandrini M., Papagno C. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in idiom interpretation: an rTMS study. Brain Res Bull 2007, 71:523-528.
73. Romero Lauro L.J., Walsh V., Papagno C. The neural correlates of phonological short-term memory: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Cogn Neurosci 2006, 18:1147-1155.
74. Romero Lauro L.J., Reis J., Cohen L.G., et al. A case for the involvement of phonological loop in sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:4003-4011.
75. Roy A.C., Craighero L., Fabbri-Destro M., et al. Phonological and lexical motor facilitation during speech listening: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Physiol Paris 2008, 102:101-105.
76. Ryan S., Bonilha L., Jackson S.R. Individual variation in the location of the parietal eye fields: a TMS study. Exp Brain Res 2006, 173:389-394.
77. Sakai K.L., Noguchi Y., Takeuchi T., et al. Selective priming of syntactic processing by event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation of Broca's area. Neuron 2002, 35:1177-1182.
78. Sato M., Tremblay P., Gracco V.L. A mediating role of the premotor cortex in phoneme segmentation. Brain Lang 2009, 111:1-7.
79. Sato M., Buccino G., Gentilucci M., et al. On the tip of the tongue: modulation of the primary motor cortex during audiovisual speech perception. Speech Commun 2010, 5:2533-2541.
80. Schuhmann T., Schiller N.O., Goebel R., et al. Speaking of which: dissecting the neurocognitive network of language production in picture naming. Cereb Cortex 2012, 22:701-709.
81. Scott S.K., Johnsrude I.S. The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends Neurosci 2003, 26:100-107.
82. Shapiro K.A., Pascual-Leone A., Mottaghy F.M., et al. Grammatical distinctions in the left frontal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 2001, 13:713-720.
83. Sidtis D., Canterucci G., Katsnelson D. Effects of neurological damage on production of formulaic language. Clin Linguist Phon 2009, 23:270-284.
84. Siebner H.R., Bergmann T.O., Bestmann S., et al. Consensus paper: combining transcranial stimulation with neuroimaging. Brain Stimul 2009, 2:58-80.
85. Silvanto J., Pascual-Leone A. State-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr 2008, 21:1-10.
86. Sparing R., Mottaghy F.M., Hungs M., et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation effects on language function depend on the stimulation parameters. J Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 18:326-330.
87. Stewart L., Walsh V., Frith U., et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation produces speech arrest but not song arrest. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001, 930:433-435.
88. Stewart L., Walsh V., Frith U., et al. TMS produces two dissociable types of speech disruption. Neuroimage 2001, 13:472-478.
89. Sundara M., Namasivayam A.K., Chen R. Observation-execution matching system for speech: a magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport 2001, 12:1341-1344.
90. Thiel A., Haupt W.F., Habedank B., et al. Neuroimaging-guided rTMS of the left inferior frontal gyrus interferes with repetition priming. Neuroimage 2005, 25:815-823.
91. Thielscher A., Reichenbach A., Ugurbil K., et al. The cortical site of visual suppression by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cereb Cortex 2010, 20:328-338.
92. Tomassini V., Jbabdi S., Klein J.C., et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging tractography-based parcellation of the human lateral premotor cortex identifies dorsal and ventral subregions with anatomical and functional specializations. J Neurosci 2007, 27:10259-10269.
93. Topper R., Mottaghy F.M., Brugmann M., et al. Facilitation of picture naming by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke's area. Exp Brain Res 1998, 121:371-378.
94. Van Rijn S., Aleman A., Van Diessen E., et al. What is said or how it is said makes a difference: role of the right fronto-parietal operculum in emotional prosody as revealed by repetitive TMS. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 21:3195-3200.
95. Vernet M., Yand Q., Kapoula Z. Guiding binocular saccades during reading: a TMS study of the PPC. FNHUM 2011, 5:14.
96. Viggiano M.P., Giovannelli F., Borgheresi A., et al. Disruption of the prefrontal cortex function by rTMS produces a category-specific enhancement of the reaction times during visual object identification. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2725-2731.
97. Warrington E.K., McCarthy R.A. Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 1987, 110:1273-1296.
98. Wassermann E.M., Blaxton T.A., Hoffmann E.A., et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dominant hemisphere can disrupt visual naming in temporal lobe epilepsy patients. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:537-544.
99. Watkins K., Paus T. Modulation of motor excitability during speech perception: the role of Broca's area. J Cogn Neurosci 2004, 16:978-987.
100. Watkins K.E., Strafella A.P., Paus T. Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:989-994.