Phonological and lexical motor facilitation during speech listening: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Journal of Physiology Paris

Volumn 102, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 101-105

  Roy, Alice C ^a,c   Craighero, Laila ^a   Fabbri Destro, Maddalena ^a   Fadiga, Luciano ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^c INSTITUT DES SCIENCES COGNITIVES   (France)

Author keywords

Frequent and rare words; Motor resonance; Motor theory of speech perception; Pseudo words; Speech listening; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUSCULTATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; HEARING; HUMANS; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; TIME FACTORS; TONGUE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 44949099246     PISSN: 09284257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Balota D.A., and Chumbley J.I. The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: lexical access and/or production?. Journal of Memory and Language 24 (1985) 89-106
2. Chee M.W.L., Hon N.H.H., Caplan D., Lee H.L., and Goh J. Frequency of concrete words modulates prefrontal activation during semantic judgments. NeuroImage 16 (2002) 259-268
3. Fadiga L., Craighero L., Buccino G., and Rizzolatti G. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience 15 (2002) 399-402
4. Fiebach C.J., Friederici A.D., Müller K., and von Cramon D.Y. fMRI evidence for dual routes to the mental lexicon in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2002) 11-23
5. Forster K.I., and Chambers I.M. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12 (1973) 627-635
6. Frederiksen J.R., and Kroll J.F. Spelling and sound: approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 2 (1976) 361-379
7. ILC, CNR di Pisa, 1988. Corpus di italiano contemporaneo (Corpus of contemporary Italian). Unpublished manuscript.
8. Jasper H.H. Ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalograghy and Clinical Neurophysiology 10 (1958) 371-373
9. Klatt D.H. Speech perception: a model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of Phonetics 7 (1979) 279-285
10. Kuhl P.K., and Miller J.D. Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science 190 (1975) 69-72
11. Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S., Shankweiler D.P., and Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review 74 (1967) 431-461
12. Liberman A.M., and Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21 (1985) 1-36
13. Liberman A.M., and Whalen D.H. On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 187-196
14. Massaro D.W., and Cohen M.M. Perception of synthesized audible and visible speech. Psychological Science 1 (1990) 55-63
15. Monsell S. The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In: Besner D., and Humphreys G.W. (Eds). Basic Processes in Reading: Visual Word Recognition (1991), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale 148-197
16. Nakic M., Smith B.W., Busis S., Vythilingam M., and Blair R.J.R. The impact of affect and frequency on lexical decision: the role of the amygdala and inferior frontal cortex. NeuroImage 31 (2006) 1752-1761
17. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
18. Pulvermüller F., Huss M., Kherif F., del Prado Martin F.M., Hauk O., and Shtyrov Y. Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 103 (2006) 7865-7870
19. Sussman H. Neural coding of relational invariance in speech: human language analogs to the barn owl. Psychological Review 96 (1989) 631-642
20. Watkins K.E., Strafella A.P., and Paus T. Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 989-994
21. Wilson S.M., Saygin A.P., Sereno M.I., and Iacoboni M. Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neuroscience 7 (2004) 701-702
22. Young M.P., and Rugg M.D. Word frequency and multiple repetition as determinants of the modulation of event-related potentials in a semantic classification task. Psychophysiology 29 (1992) 664-676