School marketing in the united states: Demographic representations and dilemmas for educational leaders

Advances in Educational Administration

Volumn 15, Issue , 2012, Pages 109-135

  Lubienski, Christopher ^a   Linick, Matthew ^a   York, J G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884993250     PISSN: 14793660     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S1479-3660(2012)0000015007     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ball, S. J., & Gewirtz, S. (1997). Girls in the education market: Choice, competition and complexity. Gender and Education, 9(2), 207-222.
2. Becker, H. J., Nakagawa, K., & Corwin, R. G. (1997). Parent involvement contracts in California's charter schools: Strategy for educational improvement or method of exclusion. Teachers College Record, 98(3), 511-536.
3. Bifulco, R., & Ladd, H. F. (2006). School choice, racial segregation, and test-score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina's charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(1), 31-56.
4. Davies, S., Quirke, L., & Aurini, J. (2006). The new institutionalism goes to the market: The challenge of rapid growth in private K-12 education. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 103-122). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5. Duggan, M. (2000). Hospital market structure and the behavior of not-for-profit hospitals. Rand Journal of Economics, 33(3), 433-446.
6. Eckes, S. E. (2010). Charter school legislation and the potential to influence student body diversity. In C. Lubienski & P. Weitzel (Eds.), The charter school experiment: Expectations, evidence, and implications (pp. 51-71). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
7. Estes, M. B. (2004). Choice for all? Charter schools and students with special needs. Journal of Special Education, 37(4), 257-267.
8. Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F. (2000). When schools compete: A cautionary tale. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
9. Foskett, N. H. (1998). School and marketization: Cultural challenges and responses. Educational Management & Administration, 26(2), 197-210.
10. Foskett, N. (2002). Marketing. In T. Bush & L. Bell (Eds.), The principles and practice of educational management (pp. 241-257). London: Paul Chapman.
11. Frankenberg, E., & Lee, C. (2003). Charter schools and race: A lost opportunity for integrated education. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(32). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n32/
12. Frankenberg, E., & Siegel-Hawley, G. (2009). Equity overlooked: Charter schools and civil rights policy. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project.
13. Friedman, M. (1955). The role of government in education. In R. A. Solo (Ed.), Economics and the public interest (pp. 127-134). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
14. Friedman, M. (2005, December 5). The promise of vouchers. Wall Street Journal, p. A20.
15. Garcia, D. R. (2008). The impact of school choice on racial segregation in charter schools. Educational Policy, 22(6), 805-829.
16. Garcia, D. R. (2010). Charter schools challenge traditional notions of segregation. In C. Lubienski & P. Weitzel (Eds.), The charter school experiment: Expectations, advocacy and evidence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
17. Garcia, D. R., McIlroy, L., & Barber, R. T. (2008). Starting behind: A comparative analysis of the academic standing of students entering charter schools. Social Science Quarterly, 89(1), 199-216.
18. Greene, J. P., Carroll, T. W., Coulson, A. J., Enlow, R., Hirsch, E. D., Ladner, M.,yStern, S. (2008, January 24). Is school choice enough? City Journal. Retrieved from http:// www.city-journal.org/2008/forum0124.html
19. Hehir, T. (2010, January 27). Charters: Students with disabilities need not apply? Education Week. Available at http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/ 01/27/19hehir-ep.h29.html
20. Hesketh, A. J., & Knight, P. T. (1998). Secondary school prospectuses and educational markets. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(1), 21-36.
21. Holt, M. (1999). Not yet "free at last": The unfinished business of the civil rights movement: Our battle for school choice. Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
22. Hoxby, C. M. (2000). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review, 90(5), 1209-1238.
23. Hoxby, C. M. (2005). Competition among public schools: A reply to Rothstein (2004). NBER Working Paper No. 11216. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
24. Kahlenberg, R. D. (2006). Helping children move from bad schools to good ones. New York, NY: The Century Foundation.
25. King, A. C. (1997, September 11). Fighting for school choice: It's a civil right. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.adti.net/ teacherchoice/civilright.html
26. King, A. C. (2001). Fighting for school choice: It's a civil right. In W. M. Evers, L. T. Izumi & P. Riley (Eds.), School reform: The critical issues (pp. 350-352). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, Pacific Research Institute.
27. Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism (1st ed.). New York, NY: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt.
28. Kleitz, B., Weiher, G. R., Tedin, K., & Matland, R. (2000). Choice, charter schools, and household preferences. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3), 846-854.
29. Kowalski, T. J. (Ed.). (2000). Public relations in schools (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
30. Labbé, T. (2007, November 6). Church decides to convert 7 schools. Washington Post, p. B1.
31. Lee, J., & Lubienski, C. (2011). Is racial segregation changing in charter schools? International Journal of Educational Reform, 20(3), 192-209.
32. Lubienski, C. (2003). Innovation in education markets: Theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter schools. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 395-443.
33. Lubienski, C. (2005a). Public schools in marketized environments: Shifting incentives and unintended consequences of competition-based educational reforms. American Journal of Education, 111(4), 464-486.
34. Lubienski, C. (2005b). School choice as a civil right: District responses to competition and equal educational opportunity. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38(4), 331-341.
35. Lubienski, C. (2007a). Marketing Schools: Consumer goods and competitive incentives for consumer information. Education and Urban Society, 40(1), 118-141.
36. Lubienski, C. (2007b). School competition and the emergence of symbolism in a market environment. In C. F. Kaestle & A. E. Lodewick (Eds.), To educate a nation: Federal and national strategies of school reform (pp. 257-280). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
37. Lubienski, C. (2011, July). The decile delusion. Education Review. Available at http://www.educationreview.co.nz/pages/section/article.php?s= Leadership+%26+PD&idArticle=21460
38. Lubienski, C., & Gulosino, C. (2007). Choice, competition, and organizational orientation: A geospatial analysis of charter schools and the distribution of educational opportunities (Occasional Paper No. 148). New York, NY: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
39. Lubienski, C., Gulosino, C., & Weitzel, P. (2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 601-647.
40. Lubienski, C., & Lubienski, S. T. (2006). Charter, private, public schools and academic achievement: New evidence from NAEP mathematics data (Occasional Paper No. 111). New York, NY: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
41. Lubienski, C., Scott, J., & DeBray, E. (2011). The rise of intermediary organizations in knowledge production, advocacy, and educational policy. Teachers College Record (ID Number 16487). Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
42. Lubienski, C., & Weitzel, P. (2009). Choice, integration, and educational opportunity: Evidence on competitive incentives for student sorting. The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 12(2), 351-376.
43. Lubienski, C., & Weitzel, P. (Eds.). (2010). The charter school experiment: Expectations, evidence, and implications. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
44. Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2006). School sector and academic achievement: A multilevel analysis of NAEP mathematics data. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 651-698.
45. Moe, T. M. (2008). Beyond the free market: The structure of school choice. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2008(1), 557-592.
46. Moore, D., & Davenport, S. (1990). School choice: The new improved sorting machine. In W. Boyd & H. Walberg (Eds.), Choice in education: Potential and problems (pp. 187-223). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
47. National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2009). Top 10 charter communities by market share: Fourth annual edition. Washington, DC: National Alliance for Public Charter Schools.
48. Oplatka, I. (2004). The characteristics of the school organization and the constraints on market ideology in education: An institutional view. Journal of Education Policy, 19(2), 143-161.
49. Oplatka, I., & Hemsley-Brown, J. (2004). The research on school marketing: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(3), 375-400.
50. Oplatka, I., Hemsley-Brown, J., & Foskett, N. H. (2002). The voice of teachers in marketing their school: Personal perspectives in competitive environments. School Leadership & Management, 22(2), 177-196.
51. Orfield, G., Frankenberg, E., & Garces, L. M. (2008). Statement of American social scientists of research on school desegregation to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County. Urban Review, 40, 96-136.
52. Rapp, K. E., & Eckes, S. E. (2007). Dispelling the myth of "white flight": An examination of minority enrollment in charter schools. Educational Policy, 21(4), 615-661.
53. Renzulli, L. A., & Roscigno, V. J. (2007). Charter schools and the public good. Contexts, 6(1), 31-36.
54. Richmond, G. (2007). Piecing together the charter puzzle. Education Week, 26, 28-29.
55. Rothstein, R. (2001). New ingredient in a voucher plan. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/02/us/lessons-new- ingredient-in-a-voucher-plan.html. Accessed on May 2, 2001.
56. Rothstein, J. (2007). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? A comment on Hoxby (2000). American Economic Review, 97(5), 2026-2037.
57. Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133-144.
58. Simon, D. (2008, July 19). 1,250 N.O. families apply for private school vouchers. Times- Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/ 2008/2007/1250-no- families-apply-for-pri.html
59. Sinitsyn, M., & Weisbrod, B. A. (2008). Behavior of nonprofit organizations in for-profit markets: The curious case of unprofitable revenue-raising activities. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 164(4), 727-750.
60. Smith, K. B. (2003). The ideology of education: The commonwealth, the market, and America's schools. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
61. Stern, S. (2008, Winter). School choice isn't enough. City Journal, 18. Retrieved from http:// www.city-journal.org/2008/2018-2001-instructional-reform. html
62. Walberg, H. J. (2000). Market theory of school choice. Education Week, 19, 46, 49.
63. Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). Institutional form and organizational behavior. In W. W. Powell & E. S. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 69-84). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64. Will, G. (2003, September 14). School choice is a civil right. Retrieved from http:// TownHall.com. Accessed on September 15, 2003.
65. Witte, J. F. (2000). The market approach to education: An analysis of America's first voucher program. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66. Wolf, N. L. (2011). A case study comparison of charter and traditional schools in New Orleans recovery school district: Selection criteria and service provision for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 32(5), 382-392.
67. Ziebarth, T. (2006). Top 10 charter communities by market share. Washington, DC: National Alliance for Public Charter Schools.