Charter schools and race: A lost opportunity for integrated education

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 11, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Frankenberg, Erica ^a,b,c   Lee, Chungmei ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g}  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^d Civil Rights Project   (United States)

^e Educ Management Information System

^f NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^g Nicaraguan International School   (Nicaragua)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042558365     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v11n32.2003     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. 20 U. S. C. 8061 (1994)
2. 20 U. S. C. 8062 (1994)
3. American Institutes for Research. (February 1993). Magnet Schools and Issues of Desegregation, Quality and Choice, Phase I: The National Survey and In-Depth Survey of Selected Districts.
4. Apple, M. (2001). Educating the "right" way: Markets, standards, God and inequality. New York: Routledge.
5. Arsen, D., Plank, D. N., & Sykes, G. (1999). School choice policies in Michigan: The rules matter. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
6. Ascher, C., Jacobowitz, R., & McBride, Y. (1999). Standards-based reform and the charter school movement in 1998-99: An analysis of four states. New York University, Institute for Education and Social Policy.
7. Beaufort County Board Of Education v. Lighthouse Charter School et al., 516 S. E. 2d 655, 659 (S. C. 1999).
8. Berry v. School District of the City of Benton Harbor, 56 F. Supp. 2d 866, 872 (W. D. MI 1999).
9. Blank, R. K., Levine, R. E., & Steel, L. (1996). After 15 years: Magnet schools in urban education. In B. Fuller & R. F. Elmore with G. Orfield (Eds.) Who chooses? Who loses? (pp. 154-172). New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Braddock, II, J. H. (1980). The perpetuation of segregation across levels of education: A behavioral assessment of the contact-hypothesis. Sociology of Education, 53(3): 178-186.
11. Clayton Foundation. (January 1999). 1998 Colorado Charter Schools Evaluation Study. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Education.
12. Cobb, C. D. & Glass, G. V (1999). Ethnic segregation in Arizona charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(1) Retrieved March, 2003 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n1/
13. Coons, J and Sugarman, S. (1978). Education by choice: the case for family control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Davis v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, et al., C. A. No. 56-1662 (M. D. La. 1999).
15. Eaton, S. E. (2001). The other Boston busing story. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16. Elam, S. M., Rose, L. C., & Gallup, A. M. (1993). The 25th Annual Phi Delta Kappan/Gallup Poll of the Public's Attitude toward the Public Schools. Phi Delta Kappan.
17. Farkas, S., & Johnson, J. (with Immerwahr, S. & McHugh, J. ). (1998). Time to Move On: African Americans and White Parents Set an Agenda for Public. New York: Public Agenda.
18. Frankenberg, E., Lee, C., and Orfield, G. (2003). A multiracial society with segregated schools: Are we losing the dream? Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
19. Fuller, B., Gawlik, M., Gonzales, E. K., Park, S., (with Gibbings, G. ). (2003). Charter schools and inequality: National disparities in funding, teacher quality, and student support. Policy analysis for California education, Working paper series 03-2. April, 2003, from http://pace.berkeley.edu/Chartersummary. pdf.
20. Fuller, B., and Elmore, R. (eds. ). (1996). Who Chooses, Who Looses? New York:Teacher College Press.
21. Gallup. (1999, August). Gallup Poll Topics: Education Poll. http://www.gallup.com/
22. Gill, B. P., Timpane, P. M., Ross, K. E., & Brewer, D. J. (2001). Rhetoric versus reality: what we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
23. Green v. County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U. S. 430 (1968).
24. Finn, Jr., C. E., Manno, B. V., and Vanourek, G. (2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Hill, P. T., & Guin, K. (2002). Baselines for assessment of choice programs. In P. T. Hill (Ed. ), Choice with equity (pp. 15-49). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, p. 49.
26. Hochschild, J. & Scovronick, D. (2003). The American Dream and the Public Schools. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Hoffman, L. M. (May 2003). Overview of Public Elementary and Secondary Schools and Districts: School Year 2001-02. Washington, D. C. : National Center for Education Statistics.
28. Horn, J. & Miron, G. (2000). An evaluation of Michigan's charter school initiative: Performance, accountability, and impact. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.
29. Howe, K. R., and Welner, K. G. (2002). School choice and the pressure to perform: Deja vu for children with disabilities? Remedial and Special Education, 23(4): 212-21.
30. Kim, J. & Sunderman, G. (2003). Findings from the first phase of school choice implementation in three districts: Buffalo, New York, Richmond, Virginia, DeKalb County, Georgia. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
31. Kurlaender, M. & Yun, J. T. (2001). Is diversity a compelling educational interest? Evidence from metropolitan Louisville. In Diversity Challenged, Orfield, G., (with Kurlaender, M. ) (Eds. ). Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, chap 5.
32. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1988). The dimensions of racial segregation. Social Forces, 67, 281-315.
33. Miron, G. & Horn, J. (2002). Evaluation of Connecticut's Charter Schools and the Charter School Initiative. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.
34. Miron, G., & Nelson, C. (2002). What's public about charter schools: Lessons learned aboutschool choice and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
35. Miron, G., Nelson, C., & Risley, J. (2002). Strengthening Pennsylvania's charter school reform: Findings from the statewide evaluation and discussion of relevant policy issues. Kalamazoo, MI: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University. Retrieved March, 2003, from http://www.wmich.edu/ evalctr/charter/pa_5year/
36. Moe, T. M. (2002). The structure of school choice. In P. T. Hill (Ed. ), Choice with equity (pp. 179-212). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
37. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
38. Orfield, G., Bachmeier, M., James, D., & Eitle, T. (1997). Deepening segregation in American public schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project on School Desegregation
39. Parker, W. (Feb. 2001). The Color of Choice: Race and Charter Schools. 75 Tul. L. Rev. 563.
40. Public Sector Consultants & Maximus, Inc. (1999). Michigan's charter school initiative: From theory to practice. Lansing, MI.
41. Reardon, S. & Yun, J. T. (2002). Private school racial enrollments and segregation. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
42. RPP International. (2000). The state of charter schools, national study of charter schools, fourth-year report. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Education.
43. SRI International. (1997). Evaluation of Charter School Effectiveness. Prepared for the State of California Office of Legislative Analyst. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
44. Taebel, D., Barrett, E. J., Thurlow-Brenner, C., Kemerer, F., Ausbrooks, C., Clark, C., Thomas, K., Briggs, K. L., Parker, A., Wiher, G., Matland, R., Tedin, K., Cookson, C., & Nielsen, L. (1997). Texas open enrollment charter schools: Year one evaluation. Texas State Board of Education.
45. Wells A. S. & Crain, R. L. (1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 64, 531-555.
46. Wells, A. S., Holme, J. J., Lopez, A., & Cooper, C. W. (2000). Charter schools and racial and social class segregation: Yet another sorting machine? In R. Kahlenberg (Ed. ), A notion at risk: Preserving education as an engine for social mobility (pp. 169-222). New York: Century Foundation Press.
47. Wells, A. S. (Ed. ). (2002). Where charter policy fails: The problems of accountability and equity. New York: Teachers College Press.
48. Willie, C. V. (2000). Controlled choice:A new and effective desegregation method. In C. C. Yeakey (Ed. ), Edmund W. Gordon:Producing knowledge, pursuing understanding. Advances in diverse communities:Research, policy, and praxis, Vol. 1. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
49. Wohlstetter, P. et al. (1995). Charter schools in the United States: The question of autonomy. 9 Education Policy 331.
50. Wood, J. (1999). An Early Examination of the Massachusetts Charter School Initiative. Amherst, MA: Donahue Institute, University of Massachusetts.
51. Wright v. Council of Emporia, 407 U. S. 451 (1972).
52. Young, B. A. and Smith, T. M. (1997). The Condition of Education 1997. Washington, D. C. : National Center for Education Statistics 97-991.